St Giordano Bruno
Well-Known Member
Sounds a bit like suicide by cop. That's all
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The mistake he made was that he chose to be independent of God. The simple act of disobedience alienated mankind from God...the way to fix it is for mankind to 'choose' dependence rather then independence.
and yet we have universal laws which are common to all nations
If that was so, why did God not instantly take Adam and Eve away from the Garden at the exact second they ate the fruit? God, being all-powerful and all-knowing, would have known exactly what was happening. Yet he did not send them away until after they had disobeyed. So why was it the disobedience that is the mistake, not something they did after they disobeyed? (Such as hiding from God, or blaming someone else for eating the fruit).The mistake he made was that he chose to be independent of God. The simple act of disobedience alienated mankind from God...the way to fix it is for mankind to 'choose' dependence rather then independence.
Oh, so now we have to get into what those standards are. And I don't want to even go there, because there are over 40000 different views on that subject, all thinking they are equally right, but all equally wrong. (That includes my own church).Sin is simply failing to meet Gods standards.
When mankind are completely and wholly meeting Gods standards, then sin will be no more. Jesus showed us the way to meet Gods standards...he told us to imitate him because he imitated God and in imitating God, he was perfect. Following Christs example in all he said and did puts us on our way to meeting Gods standards.
free will is not a sin. You have the free will to put your hand in the fire. You have chosen to get burnt. Its not the fire's fault. Its not Your immediate creators' fault (ie your parents when they gave birth to you with your inherent free will). Its your own fault that you got burnt.in essence, free will is a sin
It is the immediate creator's fault if he doesn't give any indication that the fire is harmful, knowing full well that you'll put your hand in it.
free will is not a sin. You have the free will to put your hand in the fire. You have chosen to get burnt. Its not the fire's fault. Its not Your immediate creators' fault (ie your parents when they gave birth to you with your inherent free will). Its your own fault that you got burnt.
The mistake he made was that he chose to be independent of God. The simple act of disobedience alienated mankind from God...the way to fix it is for mankind to 'choose' dependence rather then independence.
Who told you that it is wrong to murder? We take some laws as a 'given' ...they just are and they are universally accepted. Adam was united with God at that time, his conscience was perfectly in tune with Gods... he knew right from wrong without being told because he was created in Gods image. This means that he would have 'instinctively' known right from wrong....just as animals instinctively know when its time to mate, migrate, to gather food.
because his purpose had not changed. He still intended the earth to fill with mankind. And he knew that not all mankind would be like Adam and sin. He could still allow his purpose to be fulfilled and fix Adams mistake along the way.
If sin was not introduced into the world, then there would have been no need for Jesus to even come to earth for us.
But sin was introduced to the world and for that reason we needed him. When sin is completely removed from mankind, then we will not grow old and die and we will live forever.
What did Jesus say?
Happy are the mild-tempered ones, since they will inherit the earth. Matthew 5:5
The Psalms said it:
"The righteous themselves will possess the earth, And they will reside forever upon it" Ps 37:29
John said it:
"With that I heard a loud voice from the throne say: Look! The tent of God is with mankind, and he will reside with them, and they will be his peoples. And God himself will be with them. 4 And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more" Revelation 21:3-4
Everlasting life without sin and death is what God is promising....its what Adam should have had...its what the future will be for those who want it.
Jesus died for us because he wanted us to donate money in his name to Pat Robertson's 700 Club. I know because Pat told me so.
I know. But does that mean that i cannot comment on your post?i was responding to pegg...
I know. But does that mean that i cannot comment on your post?
in essence, free will is a sin
That is simply natural selection. If a nation had laws that made it okay to kill people for absolutely no reason, that nation wouldn't last very long, would it?...They are human constructs in order for national governments to survive. Basically, these laws are a governments environmental 'camouflage' against anarchist 'predators'.
If that was so, why did God not instantly take Adam and Eve away from the Garden at the exact second they ate the fruit? God, being all-powerful and all-knowing, would have known exactly what was happening. Yet he did not send them away until after they had disobeyed. So why was it the disobedience that is the mistake, not something they did after they disobeyed? (Such as hiding from God, or blaming someone else for eating the fruit).
Oh, so now we have to get into what those standards are. And I don't want to even go there, because there are over 40000 different views on that subject, all thinking they are equally right, but all equally wrong. (That includes my own church).
Then he is a rubbish ruler. There is such a thing as "mitigating circumstances."Thats why he couldnt just forgive them and let them get on with it.
in any case, if we are talking about original sin, the sin was making the choice to act out on free will.
how can one become responsible without knowing/understanding the consequence. the tree of knowledge of good and evil might as well have been called the tree of glipity and goop...because in essence good/evil had no meaning unless they acted in free will to KNOW what good and evil meant.
Some morals do have an instinctive component without any connection to cultural norms, however, they mostly work for people who are emotionally close. For example, people will always have horror for killing or harming someone emotionally close like a mother or brother. This emotion can be greatly reduced when the person kills a stranger. In many cultures, murder was only wrong when you killed a person in your tribe.
Many ethical norms have to be taught. For example we will often see children lie, steal, and be selfish. They have to be trained to be civil.
You are ignoring the point I am making. It is wrong for God to allow mankind to recieve the punishment Adam and Eve did through God's created process, the transfer of genes from parent to child. It also makes no sense for a Holy God to allow imperfect beings to be created. Why not just make the descendents of Adam sinless?
There was actually never a need for Jesus to come to this earth. Again, if a murderer was about to be sentenced to death, a judge would never allow his mother to volunteer to die for him. If we have hurt other, someone else cannot pay for us.
Having a person tortured and killed does not pay restitution to those we sinned against, it does not stop us from sinning, and does not protect those who could be violated by sinners. Punishment for any other reason is simply revenge.
Then he is a rubbish ruler. There is such a thing as "mitigating circumstances."
if you have two sons and the one is out of line is it fair in a court of law then to punish the innocent one.
Is this justice does it make any sense.
How in the world do you get your proof of one person dying for so many