The laws of justice require that for each act a reward or punishment is given. However, mankind, according to doctrine; became a fallen creature through the fall of Adam.
Let's start right here: Is it just to punish a child for the actions of his father?
Zadok said:
The result of this fallen state is eventual death. Because man is a fallen creature they cannot atone or pay for their own sins because they already are subject to death and must die. If it was possible that man could pay for their sins then there would be no purpose or justice in death.
Please keep in mind that it was God who decided that "the wages of sin are death." He could have chosen a punishment that enabled us to learn from our mistakes, or even one that allowed us to personally atone for what we have done.
Regarding Purpose: What purpose does death accomplish? To punish sin. With that in mind, what purpose does Jesus' death accomplish? He committed no sin. Is a punishment's purpose accomplished if you punish the person who did not commit the crime? If you send Cindy to timeout when it was Sally that wouldn't share her toys, does the punishment retain its purpose?
Regarding Justice: Is it
just to punish an innocent person for the crimes of another? If we sent an innocent man-- even if he volunteered-- to death row in the place of a serial killer, would justice have been served?
Is it
just to punish all transgressions equally? Should calling into work sick, when you are not sick (ie, lying) be punished as harshly as rape?
Zadok said:
There is an additional condition to mans fallen state that is a condition of limited knowledge. Man is blinded from the eventual outcome of their choices and therefore their choices are made in ignorance but faith (meaning no proof of G-d or the outcome for repentance or not repenting). Because man is in a state of darkness not knowing the full consequences of their choices it would not be just not to provide a way to overcome such ignorance therefore, should an individual begin to realize that their choices were flawed they can justly petition a Messiah, Christ or Redeemer to suffer for their former acts of ignorance. This atoning for others is known as the act of mercy or specifically the mercy of G-d.
Are you suggesting that it is more intuitive to ask a god-man to suffer our punishment for our crimes, than it is to understand that actions have consequences?
Zadok said:
In order for G-d to offer mercy without upsetting justice that G-d must atone for the transgressions and sins of those to be forgiven else there is no justice. The price or payment is to suffer death. And that is the reason it was required that Jesus die that our sins can be redeemed.
Zadok said:
As mentioned before, it is a strange justice that is satisfied by the punishment of an innocent person.
In addition, remember that it is God who decided that the "wages of sin are death." He could have created any consequence he wanted, including one that actually aided in teaching us to be better individuals.