“Nuh-uh” isn’t a sufficient rebuttal.
Yes and of course. There is always a need for those called to speak truth.
The prophets in the Old Testament gave warnings to repent they didn't just give prophecies about the future like Isaiah did.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
“Nuh-uh” isn’t a sufficient rebuttal.
Yes and of course. There is always a need for those called to speak truth.
And he cannot justify that claim.<He thinks Jesus had to die for our sins>
Is God omnipotent? Is he omniscienct?
You really have no grasp of the literature.The prophets in the Old Testament gave warnings to repent they didn't just give prophecies about the future like Isaiah did.
Nope, he did not. That is why the Jews rejected him. Too bad that you cannot find a valid source that supports you.
You really have no grasp of the literature.
Why not?
Again you are claiming that your God is not omnipotent or omniscient and that he is immoral to boot. Why worship such a failed God?
<He thinks Jesus had to die for our sins>
And he cannot justify that claim.
A confess of Sion.<He thinks Jesus had to die for our sins>
I've never thought of it in that way before.You were a human before.
You were still a human after.
Foundation is stone. God.
Moses were a human before mutated into ape man. Exodus DNA.
Jesus was a sickness like ebola.
Basic information if you aren't seeking God's powers.
Wiki:There are records of accurate early gospels. The Magdelan fragments don't have conflicting dates and guesswork and we know their authors. They were written at earlier dates than other gospels and their historical details agree with the Bible writers calling Jesus, God. https://breakpoint.org/a-fictional-messiah/
That’s what I said. Why are you arguing with me?Prophets were people who spoke for God not just people who told the future.
Substitutionary Atonement is not the only (or best) theological construction of salvation.Jesus had to be God to die for our sins. That is what is being discussed, not if the death of Jesus was needed to forgive us of sin.
1) Sin has little to do with being criminalWhen people commit crimes, unless they are pardoned, they go to jail.
Man is a human does not speak for God.That’s what I said. Why are you arguing with me?
Please make up your mind. You keep saying that he is not.God is both omnipotent and omniscient. There is no reason he can't be both. Both are consistent with a self existing God.
So what? So is the belief that he is a hamster. All of them appear to be equally true.Jesus being an archangel is an inconsistent belief with Jesus being God.
So what? You keep making incomplete arguments as if you made a point. The problem is that you believe God to be evil. He does not mete out appropriate punishments.When people commit crimes, unless they are pardoned, they go to jail.