• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Didn't God Leave Huge Quantities of Secular Evidence For Jesus?

R

rational experiences

Veteran Member
No man is God.

Jesus died on the cross.

The cross sacrifice said was supported by God...
As a father.

Do you use common sense?

God stone science philosophy.

Humans spiritual healthy natural share water oxygen heavens with garden animals and humans living.

First. Origin to self presence on God earth. Humans their own first self human.

Chooses evil. Science.

Builds it consciously. Is idle. Design idle.

Control design. Destructive.

The design destroys itself.

Forms a near human image thinker designer. On the ground of mass.

Image for machine. Anti of spirit and alien. God gases. God owned water.

Where is the image,,?

On the ground of God

What is gods images? One first is mass stone. Natural. For God.

Whose gases of spirit God was given an image for choosing evil?

A man was.

God. Ownership the image of a man sciences designer.

Taught why image existed.
Taught only God owned image of man.
Image of alien an attack against God.

Why it was taught as logical common sense

The purpose of the teaching

Alien planetary gathering UFO radiation mass that the vacuum could not cool eventually hit earth.

Common sense.

Science is a liar.

Reason science knew about how to convert earth mass. Sun blasted converted God.

God never converted itself

Satanists in science lie.

O planet owned the cross as a holy function of four seasons. Once we celebrated in festivals the cross changes of seasons.

An earthquake activated on the cross due to scientific conversion of God mass. We now mourn the tragic event.

They knew. They prophecised it.

It happened. Science caused it.

Humans died.

Science told science it was wrong and an evil conjurer of evil.

Fact of human history. Some of us would cause no harm to family. Others care less.
 
S

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
Not really. Most of the world would disagree with you on this claim. You are making a logical error. Just because the gnostic gospels may be untrustworthy does not mean that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are trustworthy.
Click to expand...

Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were first hand eyewitnesses who lived with Jesus.
 
S

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
Perhaps, but they were not authors of any gospels.
Click to expand...

Mark borrowing some details doesn't mean that he didn't write the gospel of Mark. 5 Reasons To Believe Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John Wrote The Gospels | Reasons for Jesus

1. Internal Evidence of Authorship
Within the four Gospels, one will find internal evidence of authorship. That is, the Gospels give clues who the writers were within the text itself. For instance, Matthew was a tax collector who was called by Jesus while sitting in the tax collector’s booth. The First Gospel notes that “As Jesus passed on from there, he saw a man called Matthew sitting at a tax booth, and he said to him, ‘Follow me.’ And he rose and followed him” (Matthew 9:9).[2]

Matthew’s Gospel goes into more detail on his calling (Matthew is called Levi in the other Gospels). Additionally, the Gospel provides a great deal of monetary details. Even if Matthew did borrow material from Mark’s Gospel (which would make sense since Mark obtained his information from Simon Peter), there is no reason to deny Matthean authorship to the First Gospel.
Click to expand...
 
S

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
What makes you think that? What evidence is there for such a connection?
Click to expand...

Mark wrote down the words and experiences of Peter. 5 Reasons To Believe Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John Wrote The Gospels | Reasons for Jesus

Mark’s Gospel, who wrote down the words of Simon Peter, provides internal evidence that one who closely knew Simon Peter wrote the Second Gospel. Peter’s life experiences with Jesus is the prime focus of the Second Gospel.
Click to expand...
 
R

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Who as a man wrote about four explanations?

The book compiler theist thinking about thinking.

Science begins as thinking theism.

Natural always existed in its highest evolved form.

Egotism a human science condition.

You were never expressing presence of natural form.

Your egotism forced human law to take action against a personal human want to destroy us.

What the destroyer human warning is as the Bible began the use of new applied social laws.

Which you seem to ignore.

Human possession mind in beliefs detailed by awareness was never fact.

Fact medical science said life human was bio blood flesh sacrificed.

No argument

Humans who know alien image is saved upon the face of God earth. Who claim as a human I am an alien think life is safe. As they claim I am an alien

Alien advice states image alien at ground where human is makes them safe

God man saving image in clouds.

Cloud mass as angel hair falls out.

Man life saved still got sacrificed

We were saved sacrificed.

What alien believers lie about.

Be a victim of the fall and you would know you are no alien and just a human.

As alien effect cools. Some alien conditions not as bad as others.

The worse alien condition is furtherest away in a science model is what they are trying to hold. Furtherest point in science is beginning.

What lying satanism in science wants to hold first.

It was owned by space first radiating.

They want it for a machine. To claim spatial radiation is inside core of God mass.

Lava and iron core is not spatial radiation.

Those two forms he equates equals his machine presence by mass.
 
S

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
Oh so wrong.

The authors of all of the gospels were anonymous. There is no reason to think that they were named for the people that wrote them.
Click to expand...

The Gospel of Thomas was not written by Thomas. There is more evidence the four gospels were written by their authors than the Gospel of Thomas was written by Thomas. Is The Gospel Of Thomas Authentic? | Reasons for Jesus

Firstly, the GT seems to be dependent on the earlier canonical gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John). We see this in sayings 10 and 16 which are seen to be redactions of Luke 12:49, 51-52 and Matthew 10:34-35.

This suggests that Thomas’ author (not Thomas the disciple) is either already aware of these two gospels in circulation or is borrowing from an even later redaction of these two sources. Either way Thomas comes later than the canonicals which should render some doubt pertaining to its value.
Click to expand...
 
S

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
And where do you think you can get writings of Peter from?
Click to expand...

The Gospel of Peter is questionable. Why The Gnostic Gospels Aren’t Reliable Sources | Reasons for Jesus

As some theologians have observed, clear signs of embellishment can be seen in the exaggerated events narrated by the Gnostic texts, which is an exaggeration largely absent from the original canonical gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John. The argument is that the canonical gospels on the surface read much more like one would expect of accounts retelling actual history whereas the Gnostic texts do not.

For example, one might compare the Gnostic Gospel of Peter’s narration of Christ’s so-called triumphal exit from the burial tomb when God raised him from the dead to the version in the New Testament Gospel of John. In Peter, Christ exits the tomb accompanied by angels, followed by a talking cross, heralded by a voice from heaven, and this is all witnessed by a Roman guard, the Jewish leaders, and a multitude of spectators.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top