• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why do Americans hate Hillary so much?

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
Partial birth abortions are normally used when the woman has miscarried and the fetus needs to be removed by giving "partial birth" or when something has just gone terribly wrong for the mother and/or the baby. I believe it's pretty much outlawed in the US. But it's not like women are just deciding after 8 months of carrying a fetus that they just don't feel like having it anymore and just go out and find a bunch of doctors willing to abort it. It's not the most pleasant of procedures and it's reserved from some pretty grisly situations. I would think partialy giving birth to a baby you had been looking forward to having for all that time would be pretty heart wrenching and difficult.
What do you mean by "normally used". Either partial birth abortions are used when the woman has miscarried, or they are used at other times as well. Which is it?
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
No not really.
There was a demonstration against something in the west, which was used as cover by the attackers. When a spokesman for the state department was barraged with questions in the immediate aftermath she gave her best guess.
A day or so later when what really happened was known, that was put out there for everyone to learn.

Tom
Guess? We want answers and they are guessing??? I don't think so..Prove it.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
No not really.
There was a demonstration against something in the west, which was used as cover by the attackers. When a spokesman for the state department was barraged with questions in the immediate aftermath she gave her best guess.
A day or so later when what really happened was known, that was put out there for everyone to learn.

Tom
Why did she tell her daughter it was a terrorist attack before she told us it was the reaction to a Christian video tape?

Why did she delete her emails, knowing that she was under investigation?

Why did she have classified information on her personal computer?

Why is the DNC paying people to disrupt and instigate violence at Trump Rallies?

Why is the DNC paying people to encourage people to commit voter fraud?

The list is F-ing endless.

Why did a State Department Aide ask the FBI to change the classification on Clinton's emails?
 
Last edited:

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
Why did she tell her daughter it was a terrorist attack before she told us it was the reaction to a Christian video tape?
That would be one in the same. This is the problem with your "either/or" mentality. A terrorist attack can be a reaction to a video tape. The problem was that Clinton was too open with her thoughts. She spoke before all the facts were known and some of it was obviously speculation on her part. Why is that? Because that's how the US press operates. They want to know all the facts before they even come out. They keep demanding those facts and conclusions even while they are still being researched. Then fidiots, who refuse to understand the process, attempt to use these progressive speculations as evidence of her lying. All it really shows is your mental inflexibility and proclivity to be unreasonable.

As for the DNC paying people to disrupt the RNC: you've got to be kidding. These kinds of claims demonstrate just how gullible you really are. How better to cover up/justify their violence than to plant a DNC mole they can attribute it to? Think about it... $1500??? Dayum, where can I get me a piece of that action??? It's just way too expensive to be true and you know it. How many of these were paid out? Oh, but all Trump has to do is pay someone off once to lie that they were with the DNC to get fools everywhere to believe it. yeah, I could see Trump doing that, or getting his people to act like they are DNC to do that. We don't have to incite violence at his rallies. He's doing that all on his own.

Why is it endless? Because the RNC won't stop lying and spreading lies. Unfortunately, people like you eat it up. It's like watching 'professional wrestling'. You accidentally tune in and are simply amazed that with acting this bad, people actually buy into this 'sport'. You give an embarrassed smile and are about to change the channel when I see you in the second row, with foam coming out of your mouth screaming at your guy to do the "johnson" or whatever the move du jour happens to be. The acting is bad enough, but that you actually think it's real is simply horrifying. That's all Trump's campaign amounts to: professional wrestling for the White House. It's as disgusting as it is real at this point. Here's your candidate dude. Go ahead and drool...

Trump-Wrestler2.jpg
 
Last edited:

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
What do you mean by "normally used". Either partial birth abortions are used when the woman has miscarried, or they are used at other times as well. Which is it?
Maybe continue reading my post past the point where I say they're normally used when the fetus has died. They're used in grave situations where something has gone terribly wrong. They're not used on a whim because somebody is just tired of being pregnant or something.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
That would be one in the same. This is the problem with your "either/or" mentality. A terrorist attack can be a reaction to a video tape. The problem was that Clinton was too open with her thoughts. She spoke before all the facts were known and some of it was obviously speculation on her part. Why is that? Because that's how the US press operates. They want to know all the facts before they even come out. They keep demanding those facts and conclusions even while they are still being researched. Then fidiots, who refuse to understand the process, attempt to use these progressive speculations as evidence of her lying. All it really shows is your mental inflexibility and proclivity to be unreasonable.

As for the DNC paying people to disrupt the RNC: you've got to be kidding. These kinds of claims demonstrate just how gullible you really are. How better to cover up/justify their violence than to plant a DNC mole they can attribute it to? Think about it... $1500??? Dayum, where can I get me a piece of that action??? It's just way too expensive to be true and you know it. How many of these were paid out? Oh, but all Trump has to do is pay someone off once to lie that they were with the DNC to get fools everywhere to believe it. yeah, I could see Trump doing that, or getting his people to act like they are DNC to do that. We don't have to incite violence at his rallies. He's doing that all on his own.

Why is it endless? Because the RNC won't stop lying and spreading lies. Unfortunately, people like you eat it up. It's like watching 'professional wrestling'. You accidentally tune in and are simply amazed that with acting this bad, people actually buy into this 'sport'. You give an embarrassed smile and are about to change the channel when I see you in the second row, with foam coming out of your mouth screaming at your guy to do the "johnson" or whatever the move du jour happens to be. The acting is bad enough, but that you actually think it's real is simply horrifying. That's all Trump's campaign amounts to: professional wrestling for the White House. It's as disgusting as it is real at this point. Here's your candidate dude.

Tell me, what is the benefit to you to pretend you know the answer why Hillary lied? Why are you a part of this cover up?
 

Lighthouse

Well-Known Member
I don't believe it's even legal anywhere without a dire medical issue.
Tom

It is legal in the US, in many other countries late term abortion is illegal.
I personally find late term abortion unconsitutional on grounds that the unborn have rights.
 

Lighthouse

Well-Known Member
Maybe continue reading my post past the point where I say they're normally used when the fetus has died. They're used in grave situations where something has gone terribly wrong. They're not used on a whim because somebody is just tired of being pregnant or something.

Wouldn't this be inaccurate if even 1 late term abortion is performed on a whim in the US? (With no grave situation.)
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
It is legal in the US, in many other countries late term abortion is illegal.
I personally find late term abortion unconsitutional on grounds that the unborn have rights.
Late term abortions that go to full term are called births. Legalities only complicate issues when there are serious unavoidable complications where the baby will be on life support til they die a few days later.
 

Lighthouse

Well-Known Member
Late term abortions that go to full term are called births. Legalities only complicate issues when there are serious unavoidable complications where the baby will be on life support til they die a few days later.

That sounds like a lot of fluff trying to dodge.

Late term abortions are performed at 7-8 months with no health or grave risks. They are legal.

This has nothing to do with fluff of complications.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
That sounds like a lot of fluff trying to dodge.

Late term abortions are performed at 7-8 months with no health or grave risks. They are legal.

This has nothing to do with fluff of complications.
Not true, roe vs wade gives restrictions at later term.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
Maybe continue reading my post past the point where I say they're normally used when the fetus has died. They're used in grave situations where something has gone terribly wrong. They're not used on a whim because somebody is just tired of being pregnant or something.
Never?
 
Top