-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why do atheist believe something can come from nothing?
- Thread starter Nimos
- Start date
leov
Well-Known Member
It generally phony even if they know how it works., it became too political.
sooda
Veteran Member
Not sure I understand.. Are you saying creationists are playing?
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
This control would have had to exist from Moses onward. Do you really believe that?
sooda
Veteran Member
LOLOL....
leov
Well-Known Member
Evolution takes place. They can not explain what is going on.
Maybe you're brighter than the average bear.
@Wu Wei is pretty a bright bear.
Maybe on evolution you are correct, i dont really know, its not a discussion that crops up much in everyday life but the few times it has the people ive spoken with are (i presume) typically knowledgeable.
But on forums like this there is a sharp divide between those who understand evolution (right down to the genetic level) and those who dont and do fill in the gaps in their knowledge with god.
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
Way to not answer the question.
leov
Well-Known Member
Information is much older then Moshe and came from mystery school which did not disappear.
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
This was about Bible codes. I don't know what the hell YOU are talking about here.
Yup they can, each birth produces genetic mutations, some of those mutations are beneficial and are duplicated in the next generation. Some are either benign or actively harmful. The harmful ones do not succeed in replicating.
Take the beneficial mutations (and successive mutations) over tens of thousands, millions of generations and look in the mirror to see how Australopithecus turned out
We Never Know
No Slack
Agreed. However for chemicals and or inorganic mater to become life, it had to evolve to become life or life just poofed into existence.
However the evolution we understand only deals with life after it was already life.
sooda
Veteran Member
I thought you must be joking.
leov
Well-Known Member
'Irreducible complexity' kills their view, I'd love to see real comment about it besides 'fallacy' silliness.
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
For Bible codes to be any damned good at all you have to assume that no letter ever went missing or was added since the document was first written, in the case of the Torah tradition assigns that to Moses.
leov
Well-Known Member
i
I am talking of mystery school behind Moses.
Road Warrior
Seeking the middle path..
That's an unknown neither proved or disproved either way.
The evidence for evolution deals with life after it began.
Kills 'whose view?'
To note: 'Irreducible complexity' is an unfalsifiable hypothesis proposed by the Creationists at the Discovery Institute to support the Fundamentalist Christian anti-science agenda.
Last edited:
leov
Well-Known Member
Mainstream evolutionists.
You mean 99% of the scientists in the disciplines associated with evolution? By the way I am a professional geologist part of the 99%. Pretty big mainstream.
Again . . . To note: 'Irreducible complexity' is an unfalsifiable hypothesis proposed by the Creationists at the Discovery Institute to support the Fundamentalist Christian anti-science agenda.