Why do liberals and gay rights activists say that gay marriage is similar to interracial marriage?

[Bunyip]

Perhaps you need to reconsider what you've said and think about the last judgment.

The Son of God is superior to any human which is part of the creation. You will always be lower and inferior to Jesus Christ Son of the Most High.

Just remember who you are and don't leave your position.

Perhaps you need to go back to the One Direction fan site, or trolling youtube videos. This is an adult forum.

 

[Political Onlooker]

Jesus is clearly superior to any other human; since Jesus is the only human who is not part of the Creation. (John 3:16)

But the Creation will always be inferior and subordinate to the Triune Godhead.

 

[Mycroft]

Subject title should read like this:- "Why do liberals and gay rights activists say that gay marriage is similar to interracial marriage, when they are clearly not the same?"

Why do people act like Chocolate Gateau and Cheesecake are both cake?

 

[Mycroft]

Jesus is clearly superior to any other human;

But he's dead. I'm not. Therefore I win.

 

[Political Onlooker]

Why do people act like Chocolate Gateau and Cheesecake are both cake?

But your example of cake is not a close analogy, which doesn't serve to compare different classes of human.

 

[Mycroft]

But your example of cake is not a close analogy, which doesn't serve to compare different classes of human.

 

[Political Onlooker]

I asked you a yes or no question...I do not need any of this extra blather. (But, btw, did you say that one is superior to the other in regard to "white and black?")

Are they the same in that they are both neighbors?

No, they are not the same.

 

[Political Onlooker]

No, I think YOU are annoying.

 

[Political Onlooker]

But he's dead. I'm not. Therefore I win.

Wrong. Because your suggestion that Jesus is "dead" doesn't lead to your conclusion that you've won.

 

[dust1n]

Jesus is clearly superior to any other human;

Except the Romans, apparently.

 

[Political Onlooker]

All "classes" of human are social constructs.

Be that as it may; but social constructs are often disputed territory.

They have life and death importance to most people.

Because it's a social construct doesn't mean you can disregard their impact and importance in the social world.

 

[dust1n]

Subject title should read like this:- "Why do liberals and gay rights activists say that gay marriage is similar to interracial marriage, when they are clearly not the same?"

Things can be similar without being the same, as you might imagine.

 

[Political Onlooker]

Except the Romans, apparently.

Because Jesus belonged to a subordinate status group under Roman occupation doesn't change the fact that he was superior to the Romans in a spiritual sense. Romans are only superior in terms of worldly power. Christ will still be their judge on the day of judgment.

 

[Political Onlooker]

Things can be similar without being the same, as you might imagine.

Just as black and white people can be similar.

But so what?

White people are still the dominant civilisation which controls the entire world. Whites are still undisputed leaders in the social pecking order despite their similarity to blacks.

Who cares if they are similar for one is clearly superior to the other?

Clearly, black and white people do not occupy the same space in the social pecking order, which is the most key and central point of our discussion.

Therefore, gay people are inferior to heterosexuals because each will have their own space in the social pecking order or social hierarchy.

 

[Curious George]

No, they are not the same.

So the bible is wrong?

 

[Curious George]

Just as black and white people can be similar.

But so what?

White people are still the dominant civilisation which controls the entire world. Whites are still undisputed leaders in the social pecking order despite their similarity to blacks.

Who cares if they are similar for one is clearly superior to the other?

Clearly, black and white people do not occupy the same space in the social pecking order, which is the most key and central point of our discussion.

Therefore, gay people are inferior to heterosexuals because each will have their own space in the social pecking order or social hierarchy.

But Jesus was black. I thought he was superior?

 

[Political Onlooker]

So the bible is wrong?

But where in the Bible does it say that gay people and straight people are neighbours?

 

[Political Onlooker]

But Jesus was black. I thought he was superior?

Jesus was a Semite.

 

[Curious George]

Jesus was a Semite.

Sure, I am sure it is possible to be a black Semite.

 

[Curious George]

But where in the Bible does it say that gay people and straight people are neighbours?

Oh, so now the bible wasn't including gays as neighbors? Well then all of that which you wrote earlier was pure nonsense and you are admitting to it?