• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why do the Christians accuse Jesus of writing the NT Bible?

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Did it also inspire men to write the Bhagavad Gita?
I would imagine some would think so. Of course many don't believe the account of Adam and Eve as written. There were evidently at that point TWO different ways opposing each other, offered to Eve, and then what happened? Can you guess what two opinions there were at that time?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I would imagine some would think so.
Can you prove otherwise? I can guarantee that you can't.

Of course many don't believe the account of Adam and Eve as written.
Oh, I believe it "as written", but I see it as being allegorical, much like Jesus' parables as with many of the various symbols in the Book of Revelation. They are treated as if they are real-life because that's the nature of allegory and the use of metaphors.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
metis said:
One of the Hindu scriptures. It actually is quite interesting, imo.
But my point is why would one assume that only their scriptures are divinely inspired?
Because God isn't the author of confusion.
Isn't Pauline-Hellenist-Christianity responsible for this confusion created by the Nicene unreasonable creeds , and hiding them under the carpet of mystery, please? Right?

Regards
 
Last edited:

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Can you prove otherwise? I can guarantee that you can't.

Oh, I believe it "as written", but I see it as being allegorical, much like Jesus' parables as with many of the various symbols in the Book of Revelation. They are treated as if they are real-life because that's the nature of allegory and the use of metaphors.
I understand what you are saying. So with that in mind, let me ask you this--many if not millions pray the "Our Father" rather often. What do you think Jesus meant when he taught his followers (disciples) to pray, "Let your kingdom come..."
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
metis said:
One of the Hindu scriptures. It actually is quite interesting, imo.
But my point is why would one assume that only their scriptures are divinely inspired?

Isn't Pauline-Hellenist-Christianity responsible for this confusion created by the Nicene unreasonable creeds , and hiding them under the carpet of mystery , please? Right?

Regards
I don't know what you think is confusing about the Nicene Creed.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Babies not yet born as an atmospheric body mass cools returns didn't write anything.

Lots of humans life body sacrificed petitioned Rome to stop technology temple pyramid...so I suppose that's sinful writing.

Life died sacrificed witnessed...so none of those humans wrote. Yet the researching men looking for evidence did.

Life attacked four day earth rendering whilst earth got its colliding mass...yes that was so full. Earths mass opened up into holes.

Roman brain minds sacrificed many years after finally compiled the evidence and wrote science is forbidden. As no man is God. From all the testimonies witnessed.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
metis said:
One of the Hindu scriptures. It actually is quite interesting, imo.
But my point is why would one assume that only their scriptures are divinely inspired?

Isn't Pauline-Hellenist-Christianity responsible for this confusion created by the Nicene unreasonable creeds , and hiding them under the carpet of mystery, please? Right?

Regards
Each religion and denomination tends to try and define God and what God supposedly wants us to do, so "confusion" is a byproduct of that. Trouble is no one can objectively prove they are right, or that the others are wrong.:shrug:
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
I don't pretend to know exactly what God thinks, plus there's many different takes on God/Allah/Brahman/etc.
But opposing spiritual truths cannot all be true. God is what he is. He is I AM.
He doesn't change into what someone's religion says he is.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
But opposing spiritual truths cannot all be true. God is what he is. He is I AM.
He doesn't change into what someone's religion says he is.
But the real question is which one is "true", and even that assumes that any of them are in their entirely.

Let me give you an example: Jesus and the beginning of Christianity only goes back 2000 years, and yet we know that humans as humans go back roughly 6 million years ago, so didn't God care enough about them to provide a sense of morality and direction? What about all those who lived outside the little area that Jesus preached in, didn't they count?

I don't doubt Jesus' message, but I don't think that having to be a "Christian" is what's essential in God's eyes.
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
But the real question is which one is "true", and even that assumes that any of them are in their entirely.

Let me give you an example: Jesus and the beginning of Christianity only goes back 2000 years, and yet we know that humans as humans go back roughly 6 million years ago, so didn't God care enough about them to provide a sense of morality and direction? What about all those who lived outside the little area that Jesus preached in, didn't they count?

I don't doubt Jesus' message, but I don't think that having to be a "Christian" is what's essential in God's eyes.
I guess you haven't read the first half of the Bible?
 
Top