metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Of course not, but using false equivocates is simply a form of dishonesty.I don't. Why do you support evil and corrupt rulers?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Of course not, but using false equivocates is simply a form of dishonesty.I don't. Why do you support evil and corrupt rulers?
I agree but there was no false equivalency. The two sides are equal.Of course not, but using false equivocates is simply a form of dishonesty.
I voted for Trump in 2016 and in 2020, and if he is the Republican candidate in 2024 I will almost certainly vote for him again.
The reason has nothing to do with Trump holding some kind of strange power over me. I am willing to vote for him because I agree with most of his positions and with what he stands for.
Most if not all of those, once again and as always, describe both sides. Without the quote I wouldn't even know which political candidates you were condemning.He stands for grift, greed, powers not granted by the Constitution, loyalty over Constitution, election rigging, criminality, bigotry, ignorance, crony capitalism, sexual assault, felonious scheming, insurrections... there's more, but you get the idea.
I could forgive someone's first vote for him, but not the second, and never the third.
Most if not all of those, once again and as always, describe both sides.
Without the quote I wouldn't even know which political candidates you were condemning.
You are claiming the left is free of grift, greed, powers not granted by the Constitution, loyalty over Constitution, election rigging, criminality, bigotry, ignorance, crony capitalism, sexual assault, felonious scheming, insurrections...?? With a straight face??Once again and as always, no they don't.
They were willfully ignorant the first time, same as any voter.It's hard to know where Trump's still-faithful cross the line from gullible to willfully ignorant. I'd say by the third vote, it's willfully ignorant.
Yup, he's absolutely repulsive, as a man, as a politician, as a leader, as an american, as a human being.He stands for grift, greed, powers not granted by the Constitution, loyalty over Constitution, election rigging, criminality, bigotry, ignorance, crony capitalism, sexual assault, felonious scheming, insurrections... there's more, but you get the idea.
I could forgive someone's first vote for him, but not the second, and never the third.
What a crock of crap...the left had nothing to do with Maga insurrectionism or any of that other drivel you projected.You are claiming the left is free of grift, greed, powers not granted by the Constitution, loyalty over Constitution, election rigging, criminality, bigotry, ignorance, crony capitalism, sexual assault, felonious scheming, insurrections...?? With a straight face??
You are claiming the left is free of grift, greed, powers not granted by the Constitution, loyalty over Constitution, election rigging, criminality, bigotry, ignorance, crony capitalism, sexual assault, felonious scheming, insurrections...?? With a straight face??
They were willfully ignorant the first time, same as any voter.
That's "false equivalency", and it's a disingenuous tactic to cover up one's own bias so as to defend that which should be morally indefensible. If you can't tell the difference between Trump and Biden, the Pubs and the Dems on the basis of honesty versus dishonesty, well I don't have to even finish this sentence.I agree but there was no false equivalency. The two sides are equal.
Complete nonsense, and if you truly believe this, then why even vote?
I don't.
That's "false equivalency", and it's a disingenuous tactic to cover up one's own bias so as to defend that which should be morally indefensible. If you can't tell the difference between Trump and Biden, the Pubs and the Dems on the basis of honesty versus dishonesty, well I don't have to even finish this sentence.\
BTW, I used to be a Pub.
Been a socialist ever since I could appreciate the differences between capitalism and socialism.
Me too.
But no matter what he says or does, his blind followers will respond as if they're on his leash.A lighter take on a serious subject:
Been a socialist ever since I could appreciate the differences between capitalism and socialism.
Yet it's not because I am a socialist I despise Trump. He's just a terrible person. Vindictive and stupid and in fact an absolute perfect example of what every man should not do in any given situation. If he was an avowed socialist, I'd still call him out for what he so clearly is, a nasty piece of work.
Yes, and we always need to remember that tens of millions still support him no matter how much evil he says or does, and a large percentage of them belong to the "religious right".This disgusting wretched excuse for a human being, this this, gross obnoxious toxic vile man, joked the other day about Nancy Pelosi's elderly husband being attacked in his own home. I watched that narcissistic pig utter those words myself. He was giving a rally. The crowd laughed and jeered along with him. Absolute trash...