Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Almost every sin in the bible concerns the abuse of a thing that has a legitimate purpose. Drugs, money, and sex are not moral entities but are amoral. The immorality comes by the abuse or love of these things in exclusion to what actually deserves our love and worship. Your position is drastically over simplistic and naive.
It is not playing God because one is commanded by God and the other condemned by God. In one instance I am obeying God in the other I am defying God.
Falsifiability doesn't directly relate to whether the thing exists, but it does relate to whether you have reason to believe it does. If your beliefs are unfalsifiable, then you have no rational reason to consider them correct or reliable. IOW, you're just guessing.
I actually have direct experience with this. My mother (the only Christian in my family) contracted cancer and over 5 years suffered every evil it can create and finally died. It was her reliance on faith, the fact that only people of faith tirelessly helped our family, and the hope in a life free of cancer to come that offered any comfort at all. The atheist can only say "Oh well". There was anything but silence from Christians as she suffered. While the Christians offered sympathy and effort even at the bitter end it was (to the best of my memory) only silence that atheism offered.
That is not the case. Falsifiability is only relevant when the truth of X is not available to the one who holds the belief in X. It does not matter one bit whether I have objective evidence for X if I have absolute but subjective evidence for X. It is only relevant in academic discourse, which seems to be the one place it is most often disregarded. It has no place in theology and faith.
That is not so. I can know I exist even if there was no way to falsify it. What you should have said is that there is no objective method to prove a thing exists if it is falsifiable and I am not even sure that one is true. BTW evolution sure seems to be falsifiable. We find all major body plans appear in a geological instant without any evidence of evolution and the model does not go away it only evolves into another form. Sometimes I think the theory more evolutionary than what it describes.
No amount of evil is inconsistent with a good God. I have explained that in detail and it is no longer considered a viable argument by mainstream scholars on the whole. However we do not have pure suffering to deal with. We have a level of evil which you have arbitrarily said was too much. let me ask then then how much evil given freewill would have been acceptable? How do you know? If you had the courage to follow your line of reasoning to it's conclusion then you would claim any suffering is incompatible with God. Not true but at least consistent. That world by the way would not allow freewill and so would not allow an omnipotent God to create at all.
You would not believe how much faith comes as the result of evil. Let me ask you how in the world could you have faith in the warnings of God against evil if evil did not produce suffering? How could you believe in sin's consequences if it never had any? How could you believe in freewill if you could not chose to act wrongly? How could you love anything without the choice to and all that that necessitates? It is a proven fact that tragedy produces faith, that is why church attendance grew after 9/11. We are rebellious and so tend not to believe until we see. You certainly have my sympathy if you lost faith in God because of suffering but many have found faith because of it and so you do not have my agreement. It is not goodness (and there is plenty), the miraculous, nor the evil which determines faith. It is the heart that weighs them.
Suffering many times has that immediate effect, as it did with me. However in many cases it worked on me and others in other ways, given time. If you asked the average Christian what led to his faith in many cases tragedy would be mentioned. It is not miracles, good (and there is plenty), nor evil that determines faith but the heart that serves as the lens that does. In a wiling heart great evil produces only greater faith and in a rebellious heart it's opposite. As I have stated you have my sympathy but not my agreement. Who would believe in freewill if we could not chose wrongly? Who would believe in sins severity if we did not see it first hand? In many ways evil is a great argument for God's necessity.
Prior to creation was there evil? I assume no. Who did all the creating? I assume the God of the Christians. In Rev. 21:4 The Christian God says:
Whether you believe in an old Earth or a young Earth doesn't make much difference. Suffering sounds like it is only a temporary thing, and so does evil. What happens for the rest of eternity? Does God's creation still have freewill? Can those that believed in Jesus and end up going to heaven sin? Do they even have a choice anymore? And what about God's angels? When he created them did they have freewill? If they didn't, how come they rebelled? If they did, do they still have it? Can some of them still turn away from God at some later time, or some of the bad ones repent?
But the argument seems to be that he allows it? For the greater good? It's funny, my wife just got a little dog. It has freewill, I guess, but because she loves it, she trains it. She rewards it for good behavior. She lovingly reprimands the dog when it does something wrong. She does her best to protect it from dangerous situations. When it gets old and sick and in pain, she'll have it put to sleep, rather than watch it suffer. Are we nicer and kinder and more thoughtful than God?
I read it more or less as you do...
Well, let's at least be fair in level argument. You cite an antagonistic "atheistic argument", yet preclude any atheistic counterpoints as legitimate or worthy of fair hearing? Hmmm. IN this event, just allow one "atheist" to offer honest and heartfelt condolences of a lost individual or loved one on anyone's behalf...because silly atheists are sure that dead people are gone forever. And that always hurts.
This, is a result only your own beliefs can answer, and not one left to matters of simplistic reason alone.
I'm surprised to see you trotting out this old creationist misrepresentation of the "Cambrian explosion". Off-topic it may be, but I'm reluctant to let it go unchallenged.