• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Doesn't the World Call on Hamas to Surrender?

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Throughout history, when one side of a war is losing, it's almost always the case that the losing side surrenders.

Why isn't the world calling on Hamas to surrender? If "the world" truly has humanitarian goals, the best way to stop civilian casualties in this war would be for Hamas to surrender.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Throughout history, when one side of a war is losing, it's almost always the case that the losing side surrenders.

Why isn't the world calling on Hamas to surrender? If "the world" truly has humanitarian goals, the best way to stop civilian casualties in this war would be for Hamas to surrender.

Absolutely, so it's obvious that Hamas is more than willing to have their own people unnecessarily killed.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Why isn't the world calling on Hamas to surrender?
Because most of the world isn't brainwashed into supporting Zionism like we are in the US. They get more factual reporting on the issue than we do. Most of the world is against Israel, and we are the pariahs on this. We just had 3 European countries recognize the state of Palestine. We're the rogues here.

Potatohead in the WH can stop this right now by cutting off weapons shipments to the Zionist aggressors, but he has pledged his undying support for the child killers. So they can have all the 2,000 lbs bombs they want to drop on refugee tents and mangle the bodies of toddlers with.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Throughout history, when one side of a war is losing, it's almost always the case that the losing side surrenders.

Why isn't the world calling on Hamas to surrender? If "the world" truly has humanitarian goals, the best way to stop civilian casualties in this war would be for Hamas to surrender.
And why doesn’t Jordan and Egypt want to help the refugees? If “the world” truly has humanitarian goals, they would assist, feed and help the Palestinians in these two countries until Hamas was removed.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Throughout history, when one side of a war is losing, it's almost always the case that the losing side surrenders.

Why isn't the world calling on Hamas to surrender? If "the world" truly has humanitarian goals, the best way to stop civilian casualties in this war would be for Hamas to surrender.
Or, Israel could stop committing war crimes.

Weird that you ignored that as a possibility. Unless you believe Hamas' existence justifies war crimes. Do you believe that?
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
There's something that doesn't add up...really.

If the Gazans are really victims of Hamas, why don't they seek the alliance of the IDF?
Why don't they welcome IDF soldiers as liberators and cooperate with them?

As far as my people remember, Sicilian civilians welcomed Americans as liberators, after the Nazis left the island.
 

rocala

Well-Known Member
And why doesn’t Jordan and Egypt want to help the refugees? If “the world” truly has humanitarian goals, they would assist, feed and help the Palestinians in these two countries until Hamas was removed.
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi made his toughest remarks yet on Wednesday, saying the current war was not just aimed at fighting Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip, “but also an attempt to push the civilian inhabitants to ... migrate to Egypt.” He warned this could wreck peace in the region.

Jordan’s King Abdullah II gave a similar message a day earlier, saying, “No refugees in Jordan, no refugees in Egypt.”

Their refusal is rooted in fear that Israel wants to force a permanent expulsion of Palestinians into their countries and nullify Palestinian demands for statehood. El-Sissi also said a mass exodus would risk bringing militants into Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, from where they might launch attacks on Israel, endangering the two countries’ 40-year-old peace treaty.

 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
There's something that doesn't add up...really. If the Gazans are really victims of Hamas, why don't they seek the alliance of the IDF?
Yes, they are victims of Hamas, but do they see it that way? I'm just speculating here, but consider:

How many degrees of separation are there between the typical Gazan and a Hamas terrorist? I'm guessing that many have fathers, brothers, husbands and sons in Hamas or know and are sympathetic to such people. How can these people not know where some of the terrorists are hiding? Or where some of the tunnels are. They likely know where some of the hostages are or have some information. If so, they are protecting Hamas from Israel. Not that Hamas is, but they don't see anybody else defending them, and Hamas is family, or a degree or two of separation removed - a cousin's husband or maybe a neighbor's son they watched grow up.

And if this is the mood there, then those who might want to cooperate with the Israelis do so at risk.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Throughout history, when one side of a war is losing, it's almost always the case that the losing side surrenders.

Why isn't the world calling on Hamas to surrender? If "the world" truly has humanitarian goals, the best way to stop civilian casualties in this war would be for Hamas to surrender.

- the vast majority of the killing in this conflict is being done by the IDF, not Hamas.

- attacks by Hamas aren't the thing interfering with humanitarian relief efforts.

- if Hamas were to surrender, the IDF's killings wouldn't stop and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza would continue.
 

libre

In flight
Staff member
Premium Member
If the Gazans are really victims of Hamas, why don't they seek the alliance of the IDF?
Why don't they welcome IDF soldiers as liberators and cooperate with them?
The broad stance taken among Gazan political organizations is that the IDF are actively participating in a genocidal campaign against Gaza.

It is insanity to expect broad members of the population to side with a state they think is committing genocide against them. Realistically, they will side with Hamas or any other of the militant organizations.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
There's something that doesn't add up...really.

If the Gazans are really victims of Hamas, why don't they seek the alliance of the IDF?
Why don't they welcome IDF soldiers as liberators and cooperate with them?

As far as my people remember, Sicilian civilians welcomed Americans as liberators, after the Nazis left the island.

The IDF has been the Gazans occupier and oppressor for decades. There have been many times when the IDF has murdered Palestinian civilians without even the pretense that the civilian deaths were unintended collateral damage.

For instance, in 2018, the IDF responded to peaceful protests by Gazans by murdering more than 200 civilians:

 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
The IDF has been the Gazans occupier and oppressor for decades. There have been many times when the IDF has murdered Palestinian civilians without even the pretense that the civilian deaths were unintended collateral damage.

For instance, in 2018, the IDF responded to peaceful protests by Gazans by murdering more than 200 civilians:

If they deliberately want to die as martyrs, I can feel sorrow for them.
But I can't help it. It's their free will which plays a role in it.

King Victor Emmanuel III signed an unconditional armistice with the Americans because he didn't want his people to die. For the record.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
The broad stance taken among Gazan political organizations is that the IDF are actively participating in a genocidal campaign against Gaza.
I am speaking of October 8, the day after October 7. No genocide on October 8.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi made his toughest remarks yet on Wednesday, saying the current war was not just aimed at fighting Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip, “but also an attempt to push the civilian inhabitants to ... migrate to Egypt.” He warned this could wreck peace in the region.

Jordan’s King Abdullah II gave a similar message a day earlier, saying, “No refugees in Jordan, no refugees in Egypt.”

Their refusal is rooted in fear that Israel wants to force a permanent expulsion of Palestinians into their countries and nullify Palestinian demands for statehood. El-Sissi also said a mass exodus would risk bringing militants into Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, from where they might launch attacks on Israel, endangering the two countries’ 40-year-old peace treaty.


Perhaps, the root goes a lot deeper - there is a politically correct statements for the public to mask an underlying issue:


I think this has a lot to do with it. They know a powder keg when they see it.


I think they are many reasons why the Arab nations are basically on the sidelines and probably hoping Hamas is eliminated while publicly they make Israel the proverbial scapegoat

PD - remember, it is not uncommon for one Arab nation to attack another Arab nation and blow each other up.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Do you believe that Hamas is a terrorist organization which must stop committing war crimes and return the hostages?
Yes.

However, as other posters have rightly pointed out, Hamas don't care about the lives of Gazan civilians, much less the lives of hostages in their care, so to dangle the carrot of "once Hamas do the right thing, Israel will stop doing war crimes" is essentially just acknowledging that Israel is very keen for the entire population of Gaza to die.
 
Last edited:

F1fan

Veteran Member
Throughout history, when one side of a war is losing, it's almost always the case that the losing side surrenders.

Why isn't the world calling on Hamas to surrender? If "the world" truly has humanitarian goals, the best way to stop civilian casualties in this war would be for Hamas to surrender.
I think the Baha'i should go over and talk sense into them. That ought to fix it.
 
Top