A Lurking Shadow
I'm a slave to your will
I completely agree with you. That's why I ask God for HIS word on the subject.
I asked God for many answers when I was a child, and he still hasn't gotten back to me.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I completely agree with you. That's why I ask God for HIS word on the subject.
I asked God for many answers when I was a child, and he still hasn't gotten back to me.
I asked God for many answers when I was a child, and he still hasn't gotten back to me.
The change would be from a God of revelation to a God who no longer reveals himself to his children.I would love to know how that entails change in anyway.
In the Old Testament, God said that He would never do anything without revealing His secrets to His servants, the prophets. If He stopped doing that all of a sudden, it would be a change.I would love to know how that entails change in anyway.
From what I'm seeing here is that you believe non-Christians should be tolerant, but that Christians don't need to be. Non-Christians should not be passing judgment on Christians, but it's okay for Christians to pass judgment on anybody they want to. It's wrong for people to slander Christians, but it's okay for non-LDS Christians to slander LDS-Christians. Non-Christians should not bear false witness against Christians, but non-LDS Christians are not held to this same standard with respect to LDS Christians.My point in all that is I dont believe we as Christians should be tolerant of lies and falsehoods. Anyone can slander Christians and thats ok. But if we come out against someone else everyone says that we are suppose to be tolerant towards those people.
Uh, not to sound rude, but you shouldn't be offering your perspective on this thread at all. You're a newbie, so I'll cut you some slack, but it might be a good idea to read the forum rules before posting to this particular forum again.Not to sound rude, but I think the Joseph Smith story speaks for itself. If my work in intelligence has taught me anything, its that taking a persons word for something is a horrible, horrible move in the life that is chess.
How'd you come up with that interpretation. Jesus specifically said that His personal mission was solely to the house of Israel. He commissioned His Apostles to teach the Gentiles, but He did not teach them Himself -- not once. Since He said that His other sheep would hear His voice (not merely His message as taught by someone else), He was clearly referring to other members of the house of Israel who were not among those in the Holy Land. Now you tell me who would fit this description.The sheep from another fold are the Gentiles in general. The first fold are the Jews.
So prophets are no longer needed, but Jesus Christ called them anyway and accurately predicted that they would be killed and persecuted. Why do you think this was?Also a prophet is not needed after Christ. He completed the will of the Father and thats it.
Oh, that's clever. You know, it doesn't take an ounce of effort to be sarcastic. Why don't you try again, and be nice this time. I you have to insult us to make your position look good, perhaps the problem is with your position.The book of mormon isnt worth the paper its printed on.
Uh, not to sound rude, but you shouldn't be offering your perspective on this thread at all. You're a newbie, so I'll cut you some slack, but it might be a good idea to read the forum rules before posting to this particular forum again.
Thats rich, considering I was raised a Mormon.
Thats rich, considering I was raised a Mormon.
Thats rich, considering I was raised a Mormon.
That's entirely beside the point. It doesn't matter how you were raised. You are a Satanist now and this thread is on the Same-Faith Debates Forum. Only Christians are permitted to debate on this particular topic. Not ex-Christians. Not ex-Mormons.Thats rich, considering I was raised a Mormon.
Right. Applause for the ex-Mormon Satanist who thinks he has the right to post on a Christian Same-Faith Debates forum and who can't even take a hint when he's specifically reminded of the rules. Kind of makes you wonder what about that kind of obtuse thinking is worthy of applause.:clap
Touche!
Right. Applause for the ex-Mormon Satanist who thinks he has the right to post on a Christian Same-Faith Debates forum and who can't even take a hint when he's specifically reminded of the rules. Kind of makes you wonder what about that kind of obtuse thinking is worthy of applause.
what I am interested to know, however, in reference to the OP, is can an LDS cite some important theological or moral teachings from the Book of Mormon which may help those of us non-LDS to understand its importance? I said in an earlier post I read it and didnt recieve it well, but that was 20 years ago. I might wanna ask you LDS-folks for some insight here, since I now have the opportunity.