Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Again, what does that have to do with anything I've stated?You're not aware that hamas claims to have no problem with Jews it's "Zionist" they don't like? Maybe read up on hamas before your next post.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Again, what does that have to do with anything I've stated?You're not aware that hamas claims to have no problem with Jews it's "Zionist" they don't like? Maybe read up on hamas before your next post.
Yes you have.I never whined about hamas killing civilians.
Ergo, you don't care about civilians being killed. You think it's justified. Correct?I have said a thousand times Israel is justified to respond in kind to Hamas.
What about "complaining" coming from people who aren't Hamas, who aren't Hamas apologists, don't support Hamas (in fact, oppose them) and who believe it's worth decrying war crimes and that you are explicitly endorsing war crimes?What I dont want is to hear complaining from hamas and their apologists about civilians being killed when they don't and don't even care about their own civilians.
Do you understand what a "yes or no" question is, or you just desperately trying to dodge giving an unambiguous answer because you know your answer would expose you as an apologist for war crimes?For the last time Israel is justified in responding in kind to Hamas.
So it wasn't for the last time.Yes you have.
Ergo, you don't care about civilians being killed. You think it's justified. Correct?
What about "complaining" coming from people who aren't Hamas, who aren't Hamas apologists, don't support Hamas (in fact, oppose them) and who believe it's worth decrying war crimes and that you are explicitly endorsing war crimes?
Do you understand what a "yes or no" question is, or you just desperately trying to dodge giving an unambiguous answer because you know your answer would expose you as an apologist for war crimes?
It was a yes or no question, and you failed to answer either yes or no. Hence, you dodged it.So it wasn't for the last time.
I'm not dodging anything. What have said over and over? This is a test now. I hope you studied.
That's a bit irresponsible, imo .. I would like to see moderates governing Israel, personally.Ultimately I don't care who wins..
..to be ignored?The UN is a dog and pony show..
Interesting position of genocide.I'm always honest.....unlike the Zionists
who want genocide, but deny it by
saying the UN definition doesn't apply.
No to watch for entertainment..to be ignored?
Its not accurate to say I don't care but I can't do much about it. Neither side seems interested in giving ground. Hamas imo is the more stubborn of the two. Moderates in Israel and Hamas out of the picture completely. I think with hamas being hell bent on destroying Israel we won't see peace there for a long time if ever. So if they dont care about destroying themselves and each other what we may want is meaningless.That's a bit irresponsible, imo .. I would like to see moderates governing Israel, personally.
It's too partisan atm, and what's going on there is dragging us all down .. causing division.
Sources for what? If you want sources for the OP, I think you ought to ask the TS, not me.Sources?.
Sick..No to watch for entertainment
Someone is upset. I wish that stuff mattered but it just doesn'tSick..
Sources for what? If you want sources for the OP, I think you ought to ask the TS, not me.
None that you'd accept.
Just BBC, NPR, etc.
This doesn't matter. This isn't a thread about me; I'm irrelevant to the topic.So you actually don’t know then.
Why is it my responsibility to determine how Israel should make a military response to terrorism without committing war crimes?
What kind of logic is that? You've already acknowledged that it is possible for a state to organise a military response without committing (or, at leas, limiting) war crimes. Why not just start with that?
Is that "overcoming" or "improvising?
These ones:
Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgAttacks on schools during the Israeli invasion of Gaza - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgAttacks on health facilities during the Israel–Hamas war - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgTel al-Sultan attack - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgGaza Strip mass graves - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgIsraeli blockade of the Gaza Strip (2023–present) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgGaza humanitarian crisis (2023–present) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgStructural abuse - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgGaza Strip famine - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgKilling of health workers in the Israel–Hamas war - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgKilling of journalists in the Israel–Hamas war - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgGaza Strip evacuations - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgKilling of Alon Shamriz, Yotam Haim, and Samer Talalka - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgHuman shields in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This doesn't matter. This isn't a thread about me; I'm irrelevant to the topic.
What does this mean, that you're no longer interested in the sources you were asking for?It’s fine,truly.
What does this mean, that you're no longer interested in the sources you were asking for?