Ignatius A
Well-Known Member
I've repeated over and over Israel is justified in responding in kind to Hamas. You can highlight stuff and act all horrified and sanctimonious it's not really a good argument though
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why Has Israel Killed 40,000 Civilians In Gaza?
- Thread starter Jimmy
- Start date
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Again, so you explicitly believe committing war crimes is a justified response to committing war crimes. Right?
Oh god, the irony of this statement coming from the "Yes, war crimes are okay. And may I remind you Hamas are bad?" guy.
muhammad_isa
Veteran Member
You can 'laugh your butt off' .. because you can.
This is part of the problem .. this "us v. them, and I'm confident we'll win" attitude.
Ignore UN resolutions, MAGA.
Ignatius A
Well-Known Member
I believe Israel is justified in responding in kind to Hamas.
I never sad war crimes were ok. Again you'll whine that I'm questioning your comprehension skills.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Do you believe WAR CRIMES are a justified response to WAR CRIMES? Do you believe KILLING CIVILIANS is a justified response to KILLING CIVILIANS?
I have repeatedly asked you in another thread if committing war crimes was justified, and you repeatedly answered yes.
No, I'll question yours, since you repeatedly said war crimes are justified.
Ignatius A
Well-Known Member
Ultimately I don't care who wins. I am of the same mind about the ME. as I am about Russia Ukraine. If they all killed each other off then many the rest of us can get on with living life.You can 'laugh your butt off' .. because you can.
This is part of the problem .. this "us v. them, and I'm confident we'll win" attitude.
Ignore UN resolutions, MAGA.
The UN is a dog and pony show.
Ignatius A
Well-Known Member
Why you screaming? You're coming unhinged friend. Maybe try decaf. Some people can't handle the real stuff.
Yes war crimes can be justified not ok. If someone is trying to murder me and i kill them it's justified not ok.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Not sure if you know how forums work, but this is type, not spoken word.
So you openly acknowledge they CAN be justified, despite asserting that you never said they can be.
So, are war crimes justified in this case?
Self defence is not a war crime.
To use your analogy, somebody tried to murder you so you went out and murdered somebody else.
Justified?
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Here's a funny joke. A guy walks into a bar and says:
"Hamas are bad because they don't care about the deaths of innocent civilians! They're rabid dogs!"
The same guy, minutes later, says:
"I don't care if lots of innocent civilians die. If they all just died we can all get on with our lives."
Funny joke?
So you don’t have an answer,you’re not a soldier after all and want the killing to stop but have no idea on how Israel should have responded.
A military person would adapt improvise and overcome,that what you do in a war,when the enemy is shooting at you from behind civilians what do you do,now we know for sure about the hospital and tunnels what do you expect.
Which “explicit” war crime?,im back to work now.
Ignatius A
Well-Known Member
Copy and paste where I said they can never be justified.
Ignatius A
Well-Known Member
You're attributing a quote to me that I never wrote. That makes you a liar.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Why is it my responsibility to determine how Israel should make a military response to terrorism without committing war crimes?
What kind of logic is that? You've already acknowledged that it is possible for a state to organise a military response without committing (or, at leas, limiting) war crimes. Why not just start with that?
So, what part of "adapting, improvising and overcoming" necessitates the need to mass slaughter civilians?
Is that "overcoming" or "improvising?
These ones:
Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip - Wikipedia
Attacks on schools during the Israeli invasion of Gaza - Wikipedia
Attacks on health facilities during the Israel–Hamas war - Wikipedia
Tel al-Sultan attack - Wikipedia
Gaza Strip mass graves - Wikipedia
Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip (2023–present) - Wikipedia
Gaza humanitarian crisis (2023–present) - Wikipedia
Structural abuse - Wikipedia
Gaza Strip famine - Wikipedia
Killing of health workers in the Israel–Hamas war - Wikipedia
Killing of journalists in the Israel–Hamas war - Wikipedia
Gaza Strip evacuations - Wikipedia
Killing of Alon Shamriz, Yotam Haim, and Samer Talalka - Wikipedia
Human shields in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict - Wikipedia
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
That's false. You need to work on your comprehension. I very clearly said it was a funny joke.
Ignatius A
Well-Known Member
So you mean just more of your buffoonery
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
No, your hypocrisy.
You whine about Hamas killing civilians, despite the fact that you believe killing civilians is justified. You whine about Hamas not caring about civilian deaths, despite not caring about civilian deaths yourself. You whine about people lacking comprehension, despite having no comprehension yourself.
One last time: are war crimes justified under these circumstances, yes or no?
I'm always honest.....unlike the Zionists
who want genocide, but deny it by
saying the UN definition doesn't apply.
None that you'd accept.
Just BBC, NPR, etc.
A heart, eh.
Dang!
Ignatius A
Well-Known Member
I never whined about hamas killing civilians. I have said a thousand times Israel is justified to respond in kind to Hamas. What I dont want is to hear complaining from hamas and their apologists about civilians being killed when they don't and don't even care about their own civilians.
For the last time Israel is justified in responding in kind to Hamas.