BrasenWall
Member
So InGodWeTrust
You say our new deal has the same law. Does that include the sabbath and if not why?
You say our new deal has the same law. Does that include the sabbath and if not why?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++Not sure i understand what your saying Ben.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++BrasenWall,
The change in the covenant is not replacing the old one with an entirely new one.
We have a new and better priest and we have a new and better sacrifice.
So, considering all that, he is able to negotiate a new and better contract, one with new and better promises.
Our new and better deal has the same Law, as its basis, but we get a new and better promise, namely eternal life.
I find no indication otherwise. (short answer)So InGodWeTrust
You say our new deal has the same law. Does that include the sabbath and if not why?
I was reading BrazenWall's commenting on the Book of Hebrews and he was saying something about someone saying that it was written for Jews. The whole thing seems rather esoteric to me and I think it would have been understandable to the specific person who the author was addressing this letter to. I find it difficult because of how far removed we are from the world that person lived in.++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
So, you have a new and better sacrifice? Whose sacrifice? Thousands of Jews were sacrificed by being crucified by the Romans in the very same fashion Jesus was. Before, during and after Jesus. Whose sacrifice are your talking about?
Oh! So, what motivates you to accept Jesus' sacrifice is the promise of eternal life?
What an autruistic reason to exercise one's faith! That's conditional loyalty. How about loyalty to the Covenant without the condition of eternal life? Think it through!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well Mik, the truth is that Paul did say that "Christ is the end of the Law." (Rom. 10:4)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++Yes, I know, and you are correct, and I stated that Paul said that. And I stated..
The original Greek work for end (Christ is the end of the Law) is telos. Telos literally means "The aim or end purpose of a thing, goal" example.. You would say to what end will you keep doing that,, and the answer is until some goal or purpose is obtained. So Paul saying that Christ is the (halting, dead end, no more law) end of the law, but also saying; do we void the law through faith, certainly not; and the doers of the law will be justified (and this list goes on!) would not make sense at all, quite a contradictions,, big time. But if you realize that it says that Christ is the end goal or purpose of the law, you realize that Jesus was perfect, perfectly righteous, and we should strive to become just like Him.
I was trying to give you a little insight into the Greek word used there and it's real definition... that is fact. I don't need to interpret it at all. There are other Greek words for end which mean a 'completion or fulfillment', but those were not used,.. the word meaning 'end goal or purpose' was used, for a reason. I follow the law with the goal of being Christ-like in my heart. Christ is the end of the law, I believe that, that is why I follow the law,, just as He did as He did when he walked the earth,, because I want to be as much like Him as I possible can.
Man I missed a lot while I was gone!! Everyone went crazy!
mik
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++I was reading BrazenWall's commenting on the Book of Hebrews and he was saying something about someone saying that it was written for Jews. The whole thing seems rather esoteric to me and I think it would have been understandable to the specific person who the author was addressing this letter to. I find it difficult because of how far removed we are from the world that person lived in.
People love to use this book because they can use it to argue points, as a source for proof texts that are hard to refute, by virtue of the difficulty of understanding it, in the first place. So, regardless of my personal view of the Book, I find myself forced to study it.
That nice little piece (the new and better, rant) is a result of my latest investigation into it and I am stating what the point was that the author of Hebrews was trying to make. It does not necessarily reflect my own personal beliefs, just what I believe that the writer believed.(but in my own form of valley speak, or whatever)
This is in stark contrast to another letter of Paul's where he says, see, I am writing this in my own hand. This particular letter would have caused an uproar because it is the most direct attack on the Jewish religion. He may have had someone write it as a propaganda piece to be distributed, anonymously.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I have news for you. the author of the Letter to the Hebrews is no longer unknown.
It was written by Paul. Here is the reason why he did not sign that Letter of his. After he decided to found his own church, Christianity, he went to Jerusalem two times. The first time he spent 15 days, when he caused such a havov in Jerusalem preaching that Jesus was the Messiah, son of God and that he had resurrected that the Jews went on an uproar to kill him for preaching heresy.(post edited to save space)
This is in stark contrast to another letter of Paul's where he says, see, I am writing this in my own hand. This particular letter would have caused an uproar because it is the most direct attack on the Jewish religion. He may have had someone write it as a propaganda piece to be distributed, anonymously.
I doubt that Paul did the actual writing, but he may have been the mind behind it. He did a good job of disguising his authorship, if in fact he did write it.We did a huge study on the book of Hebrews a while back. If I find my notes, I can give you all the reasoning facts behind it,, but yes, Ben is correct, Paul wrote the book of Hebrews.
mik
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++I doubt that Paul did the actual writing, but he may have been the mind behind it. He did a good job of disguising his authorship, if in fact he did write it.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hi Mik, welcome back.
You seem to be in trouble to harmonize Paul with Jesus. Don't try it! It's a wasting of
time. Paul is the personification of contradiction. The New American Version of the Bible puts him saying in Romans 7:15, "I cannot even understand my own actions."
What did you expect?
Then, you say, "We should strive to become just like Jesus." You will never be able to become just like Jesus if you never drop the "Christ" of Paul. That's what causes
all the confusion. We read in Revelation 14:12 the following: "Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus." I am sure you know what was the faith of Jesus: Judaism. How about Paul's?
Christianity. How could you find harmony between Jesus and Paul if they did not practise the same faith? The saints are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus, which was Judaism. The title of "Christ" was added to Jesus by Paul about 30 years after Jesus' death. Even Jesus' Apostles had never heard of it
till Paul showed up in Jerusalem preaching that Jesus was the Messiah, son of God, and that he had resurrected. Good luck Mik!
Ben :clap
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Nope, no problems here at all,, thanks for your concerns. I have never had any reason to believe that Paul wasn't in harmony with the old covenant laws, or the principles that Jesus taught. I guess I hadn't caught on before that you believe these things about Paul. I will keep that in mind when I read your posts,, I might better understand what and why you are saying some things.
Romans 7. 14 For we know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, sold under sin. 15 For what I am doing, I do not understand. For what I will to do, that I do not practice; but what I hate, that I do. (Who doesn't suffer with this internal debate.. He knows what is right and wrong, yet he continues to sin, despite that fact that tries so hard not to.) 16 If, then, I do what I will not to do, I agree with the law that it is good. 17 But now, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me. 18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good dwells; for to will is present with me, but how to perform what is good I do not find. 19 For the good that I will to do, I do not do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice. 20 Now if I do what I will not to do, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me. 21 I find then a law, that evil is present with me, the one who wills to do good. 22 For I delight in the law of God according to the inward man. 23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. (He recognizes that Satan is the ruler of earth right now,, and the human heart is deceitful above all things, and that our human nature is enmity towards God,, not because we will it to be so, but the law of evil, of Satan, is broadcasted through the air for all, and circles through the minds of us all constantly, tempting us to do evil. Sometimes I have felt that gut-wrenching sorrow from within because I just knew so well that something was wrong, but gave in to the temptation and did it anyway, and the sin not only hurts me, but God.) 24 O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death? 25 I thank God—through Jesus Christ our Lord! (Paul is a very humble man before God, and seeks Him out, through Jesus Christ our Lord,,, probably a wise choice!) So then, with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin. (And so the internal struggle of man goes on, and he will continue to try.)
And again I state, that the Greek meaning of the word at the time it was written is very significant to the meaning of a verse. That is a fact.
I will endure to the end, at least trying. You are right, no one will ever be like Him while alive in the evil age, under the rule and influence of Satan. Our Father understands that children make mistakes constantly, but the effort must continue. When you see your kid not even trying to do what you told them, it is a whole new game!
I am curious Ben, you keep the weekly Sabbath? (sunset Friday to sunset Saturday?) How about the annual Sabbaths?
mik
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Did you get the last verse of Romans 7? Paul praises God for his condition in serving the law of sin with his flesh and the Law of God with his mind. That's an easy life to live, when one enjoys the good of both worlds. On the other hand, that's a shameful confession of a man who was responsible for a religion: The first Pope of Christianity.
Regarding your curiosity about my keeping the weekly Sabbath from sunset Friday to Saturday sunset, I do. However, I have no qualms to involve myself on any activity to help physically or spiritually anyone else.
Ben :rainbow1:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Ben, Paul harmonizes with all of scripture. You dont have the spiritual eyes to see it yet. In no way does he contradict anything.
Serving the law of sin? Then what was he doing daily?
1Co 15:31 I protest by your rejoicing which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily.
What is dying to?
Rom 8:13 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.
Col 3:5 Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry:
There is nothing easy about this life trust me.
Oh by the way i guess he must of fooled Peter too since in Roman 7 and 8 he his teaching us to have a clear conscience
1Pe 3:21 The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:
Gee here is some harmony
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Did you get the last verse of Romans 7? Paul praises God for his condition in serving the law of sin with his flesh and the Law of God with his mind. That's an easy life to live, when one enjoys the good of both worlds. On the other hand, that's a shameful confession of a man who was responsible for a religion: The first Pope of Christianity.
Regarding your curiosity about my keeping the weekly Sabbath from sunset Friday to Saturday sunset, I do. However, I have no qualms to involve myself on any activity to help physically or spiritually anyone else.
Ben :rainbow1: