McBell
Unbound
:biglaugh:Read the thread. If you still don't see ... meh
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
:biglaugh:Read the thread. If you still don't see ... meh
And he was born on christmas day.I love the Twilight Zone. It's dark even today, though I suppose that's understandable when you know Serling's military record.
What is the value of the electric current that generated in our bodies ?
Naw, this thread is kinda dumb ... Comfort's banana theory reveals abject stupidity combined with sexual dysfunction.This thread is no different than Ray Comforts banana "theory".
Quite. Comfort's Banana is deliciously ironic. What does he use as proof of an all-knowing, all-powerful creator-God? A man-made fruit that has only been around since the mid 1800s.Naw, this thread is kinda dumb ... Comfort's banana theory reveals abject stupidity combined with sexual dysfunction.
Living (as I do in Hawaii) and having a sustainable farm (as my wife and I do) makes that joke all the more personal.Quite. Comfort's Banana is deliciously ironic. What does he use as proof of an all-knowing, all-powerful creator-God? A man-made fruit that has only been around since the mid 1800s.
Yep. Fun fact for those who don't know: The Cavendish Banana? If I remember correctly each banana is a clone of the first one from the 1800s. You may notice that compared to other fruits, the Banana has an amazing consistency regarding flavour, texture & appearance. All the changes you might find are the result of different growing conditions(not enough food/water/sun) or over-ripened(you can work this one out yourself).Living (as I do in Hawaii) and having a sustainable farm (as my wife and I do) makes that joke all the more personal.
As far as I know there are 28 cultivars of bananas, I grow eight of them. I do not bother with the Cavendish, the plant that most of you eat as a banana, but that I will not bother with since it is so inferior to the other cultivars that do not travel as well, a plant that is infertile and man-made.
Hey, I found this ...
"Cats hold a special place to the Muslims, since Prophet Muhammad is very fond of cats.................
Hey, I found this ...
"Cats hold a special place to the Muslims, since Prophet Muhammad is very fond of cats.
One story mentioned that a cat saved Prophet Mohammad from being bitten by a deadly snake.
There was also a story of the Prophet cutting off his shirt sleeve rather than disturbing his sleeping cat when it was time for prayers. When people at the mosque noticed him wearing a torn sleeved robe, they asked "Holy Prophet, why is your garment torn?"
The Prophet simply replied that his cat is sleeping soundly upon the sleeve of his robe and rather than disturbing the cat, he cut the sleeve and put on what remained of his garment. The Prophet is so kind to animals that he would not pull the garment or awaken the cat, instead he rather cut his robe and let the cat sleep undisturbed.
It is a well-known fact that the Prophet is a cat lover and respect animals. Muslims are taught to follow his exemplary behaviour on kindness to animals.
A companion of the Prophet was given the name Abu Hurairah. The name Abu Hurairah means 'father of the cats'. Abu Hurairah was given this name because where ever he goes, he always had a kitten with him.
The Prophet also mentioned "To catch birds and imprison them in cages without any special purpose is considered abominable." Hence if you have birds living in cages, set them free. "
In Hadith (Muslim religious text) of Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 56, Number 673, narrated by Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "While a dog was going round a well and was about to die of thirst, an Israeli prostitute saw it and took off her shoe and watered it. So Allah forgave her because of that good deed."
In another Hadith text, the Prophet told his companions of a woman who would be sent to Hell for having locked up a cat; not feeding it, nor even releasing it so that it could feed herself."
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/1468-65-holy-prophet-muhammad-cats
This thread is no different than Ray Comforts banana "theory".
Ah ha! That's why doggies don't count!
........... is this why laws about dogs and dog-keeping in Iran are so fierce?
I wonder, can you take a cat for a walk in a public place, but not a dog?
Was this love of *****-cats evolution, or the wish of a creator?
Being kind to animals doesn't mean that we are bad if we believe that horses were made to help man in his transportation as camel is as well.
As i said before that we kill sheep,cow,chicken ..etc to eat them, so we believe that God created them as a source for our food and believing so isn't a bad thing.
We're Homo sapiens sapiens, as opposed to Homo sapiens neanderthalensis. The latter aren't considered modern Humans.Modern humans were there.
The species that you and all other living human beings on this planet belong to is Homo sapiens.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand. I suspect a language barrier here.No, humans were in need to think for more than 100,000 years to start learning how to ride a horse.
Leopold Kronecker, perhaps most famously (although he actually said that God created the integers, and did so in response to a prove of a type of number he believed didn't exist). The idea that mathematics is not a construction of humans goes back at least as far as Plato.Who said that math wasn't constructed by man?
but how long modern humans lived to construct math as we know it today, around 200,000 years and then you're surprised why God had to spent a long of time to evolve modern humans from simple ones to more advanced ones.
And what had prevented modern humans from inventing the computers 100,000 years ago ?
It is about logical reasoning, thing started from simple to more complex and to more advanced.
Is it logical to think that man invented the car before knowing the wheels or invented the TV without knowing the electricity.
I think humans were little better than other apes are now when it came to survival. For most of our existence, the food needed meant most humans existed only in small populations and that those who couldn't contribute to the community were left to die (such as unwanted infants or the elderly). The "food needed" resulted from the human development of agriculture after modern humans had existed for tens of thousands of years.Do you think it is logical to evolve humans before bringing the food needed for him to stay alive.
Ah ha! That's why doggies don't count!
........... is this why laws about dogs and dog-keeping in Iran are so fierce?
I wonder, can you take a cat for a walk in a public place, but not a dog?
Was this love of *****-cats evolution, or the wish of a creator?
this is famous hadith about good deed and mercy .Did you read the second-last paragraph ?
"In Hadith (Muslim religious text) of Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 56, Number 673, narrated by Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "While a dog was going round a well and was about to die of thirst, an Israeli prostitute saw it and took off her shoe and watered it. So Allah forgave her because of that good deed."
We're Homo sapiens sapiens, as opposed to Homo sapiens neanderthalensis. The latter aren't considered modern Humans.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand. I suspect a language barrier here.
Leopold Kronecker, perhaps most famously (although he actually said that God created the integers, and did so in response to a prove of a type of number he believed didn't exist). The idea that mathematics is not a construction of humans goes back at least as far as Plato.
I'm not surprised. It's called agriculture. Once we were able to plant, farm, and raise animals for food rather than hunt the capacity for specialization increased quickly and dramatically. Artisans have little place in a hunter/gatherer society that is usually always bordering on starvation. Same with permanent residences built from stone, literature, coins, patrons (or their modern equivalents), etc. Humans have learned more, developed more, and increased in technical sophistication (along with academia in general) within the last few centuries than they have over the last 100,000+ years. This isn't the result of a learning curve, as humans learned little and changed little for most of our existence.
The inability to devote resources beyond sustaining a small population thanks to reliance on the availability of game and food that grew in the wild or required minimal cultivation.
What do you mean by "things"? Human constructions?
No. It's just not relevant.
I think humans were little better than other apes are now when it came to survival. For most of our existence, the food needed meant most humans existed only in small populations and that those who couldn't contribute to the community were left to die (such as unwanted infants or the elderly). The "food needed" resulted from the human development of agriculture after modern humans had existed for tens of thousands of years.
You didn't. You mentioned Homo sapiens. However, neanderthals are Homo sapiens.where did i mention Homo neanderthalensis ?
Do you think it's rational that modern human spent more than 150,000 years to learn how to ride the horse ?
I don't agree with them, human constructed math and other things with knowledge.
Modern human was still primitive just few thousands of years ago, just imagine how the world looked like just 3000 years ago, the question is how knowledge increased rapidly in just few thousands of years compared to the existence of Homo sapiens for 200,000 years.
We were lucky, thanks for the good chances and the luck !!
I mean that it's rational that complexity started first with simplicity.
For example cars 50 years ago wasn't as complex as today's cars similarly Homo erectus wasn't as smart as Homo sapiens.
I think we are just as lucky as viruses, less lucky than extremophiles, and that most of the food we eat wasn't around before our existence. We cultivated and/or made it.Do you think human was lucky that food were ready before his existence, is it all about good chances and luck or someone had planned for it ?
You didn't. You mentioned Homo sapiens. However, neanderthals are Homo sapiens.
I think it doesn't matter, as they didn't do this.
Fair enough. But are you aware of their arguments.
Humans didn't change. The fact that human society was "primitive" a few thousand years ago simply reflects how much incidental discoveries result in a totally different existence.
Were we lucky or does this somehow relate to God?
It didn't.
You're conflating complexity with other notions. There are various metrics of complexity. Which are you using?
I think we are just as lucky as viruses, less lucky than extremophiles, and that most of the food we eat wasn't around before our existence. We cultivated and/or made it.