Simplelogic
Well-Known Member
yawnThank you dear Debate. I was rather astounded that he went this far. Arrogant seems like too pale a word.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
yawnThank you dear Debate. I was rather astounded that he went this far. Arrogant seems like too pale a word.
bye…next time bring something to the discussion.You and I rarely agree Catch but this time we do. I find no reason to engage a person who only likes the sound of their own voice and is clearly not interested in honest and open discussion. I'm done.
I didn't tell anyone to leave. I said if they don't like my opinions they can go to another thread. No need to sit around here and whine about how "insensitive" I am. Produce a logical argument. We are in the "debates" section after all.You don't have the right to tell members to leave just because they disagree with you. The forum welcomes all members regardless of their views.
Where do we want to begin.I think Metis and Rosends have taught me an important lesson in this thread. No matter how many times people run circles around you, your ears are plugged and you continue to chant the same things.
The threads where you were dissected piece by piece is convincing enough for me. So sure, I don't back down from challenges, but it really seems a waste of time. That said, you're the one making accusations, so why not disprove Christianity for me and we go from there? You're pounding your chest at me, so say something already.
I don't believe you're in a position of either authority or knowledge to determine what's "all over the place." I've stated twice now that I hold an Mdiv from an accredited seminary and an ordination in a mainstream denomination. That should be enough.What is your religion, anyway? You're all over the place.
Completely missing the boat in your premise, and watching you chase your tail here, I doubt you're equipped to recognize a "logical argument."I didn't tell anyone to leave. I said if they don't like my opinions they can go to another thread. No need to sit around here and whine about how "insensitive" I am. Produce a logical argument. We are in the "debates" section after all.
Sounds like a personal problem to me...I am blunt with people who defend bs religious institutions that claim to descend from the God of Abraham.
This says it all.I have have little respect for humans
in principale teaching is common , in some details not common .Is your belief common among Muslims? A while ago, I was talking to a Muslim who was claiming that parts of the Torah were corrupted. When I asked him what parts of Torah did he believe were uncorrupted, he quoted me a single sentence in Deut. that he said remained free from corruption. You saying 70-90% is uncorrupted is far different.
Religion critique masturbation isn't a particularly relaxing hobby.Oy, again with this?!
Somebody needs a hobby.
I don't believe you're in a position of either authority or knowledge to determine what's "all over the place." I've stated twice now that I hold an Mdiv from an accredited seminary and an ordination in a mainstream denomination. That should be enough.
Jesus fulfills the Law of the older Covenants. Jesus establishes the New Covenant with us. That hardly constitutes "all over the place." But whatever floats your boat, I suppose. Everyone but the fringe wacko fundigelicals recognizes such accreditation and ordination.
It certainly is. Please, continue with that. It's entertaining in a wrong sort of way.Its remarkable to see the willful ignorance
It's called "setting good boundaries." It's need-to-know information. You don't need to know. It's a mainstream denomination. That ought to be good enough, because they're all fairly close in the essentials.Why can't you answer the question? What denomination?
It's called "setting good boundaries." It's need-to-know information. You don't need to know. It's a mainstream denomination. That ought to be good enough, because they're all fairly close in the essentials.
Responding to vomit is fairly pointless. Cleaning up the mess seems more apropos.Still no response to my argument.
The Torah prohibits Jews from following any prophet that tells Isreal to follow "other commandments". Your prophet clearly teaches against numerous commandments which all devout Jews believe were given by God Himself. Its illogical for Muslims to say they "believe in the Torah" when they follow Muhammed. Torah is an all or nothing law structure. No man has the right to teach against them and still claim they "follow it".in principale teaching is common , in some details not common .
same question is your belief common among Jews ?
I did not say 70 or 90 % is uncorrupted or corrupted , i am talking about TEACHING .
I meant this :
Believe in one GOD,His angels , He is the only Creator, believe in His messengers and His Books ,accept His destiny bad or good . don't obey Satan
-obey and pray God
-do good deeds to people ,avoid to bad deeds to people
-don't lie ,steal,adutery ...etc
Sorry. No sale. I've set a boundary; you're patently not respecting it. What makes you think I'm going to cave in now???Lol, which website?
No, you've proven they're not even close.
Who and what are you referring to?RECOGNIZE MY AUTHORITY OF WHICH I WILL TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT.
Kind of a joke.