• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why making your children follow your religion truly is brainwashing

Me Myself

Back to my username
This doesn't follow. God's existence is not a fact. It is a belief. A fact is "the earth is a sphere", something that has enough evidence to prove. You don't have to prove the opposite of a claim for the original claim to not be a fact.

Facts are simply things that are true. Whether there is scientific evidence for them or not is irrelevant for their status as facts.

For example, it is a fact I am sitting at my bed right now. You may not believe it and I have no way of proving it to you, but it is a fact.

God is likewise. You just dont believe in it, but you disbelief does not make it not a fact.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
Of course not, because you and me disagree about several facts.

For me, consciousness in everything is a fact, you think it is not a fact.

So me teaching my kids the facts I know would not be indoctrination, because they are facts that I know and am imparting upon them.

You believe it is because you believe they are not facts.

As such, we cant objectively know if it is indoctrination or not.


fact: definition of fact in Oxford dictionary (British & World English)

Fact - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Interestingly, given that religions contradict each other on many levels, it is safe to say most religions would be, at least partially, factually inaccurate.

Meaning that if you judge indoctrination on the grounds of whether it is a fact or not, then most of the time it is undoubtedly religious indoctrination, even if you can't determine which is which.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Religions, for the most part, are not run by a sociopath/narcissist like Jim Jones.

Which is why religion is tolerated, even accepted or encouraged, instead of forbidden.

However, that is no reason to fail to notice - or to take measure against - those dangerous excesses.

As a comparasion, most physicians aren't murderers, but we take measures to avoid medical misbehaving all the same.

I just don't understand why people feel so bothered by the simple statement that there is such a thing as religious abuse, often inflicted by the raising parents. It is as clear a fact as it could be.

Sure, there are difficult, unpleasant questions arising from that acknowledgement. But outright denial is IMO a very bad mistake that no one, particularly religious people themselves, can afford to tolerate.


And who says religions teach gay hatred?

Fred Phelps, for one. Alas, he is hardly alone.


(I now refuse to use the term homophobia, because it does not accurately describe the phenomena). When I say "indoctrinate", I mean teaching kids to say their prayers or whatever.

You know, Christine, there is really no comparison between what you do and what some misguided people do.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Facts are simply things that are true. Whether there is scientific evidence for them or not is irrelevant for their status as facts.

Not exactly. A fact is something that can be proven. You're right that it's something true, but it also has to be verifiable to anyone, hence proof.

For example, it is a fact I am sitting at my bed right now. You may not believe it and I have no way of proving it to you, but it is a fact.

Technically you could prove it.

God is likewise. You just dont believe in it, but you disbelief does not make it not a fact.

You're right, my disbelief doesn't make it not a fact. The fact that it's not a fact does. It's a belief, and a belief is different from a fact.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
Interestingly, given that religions contradict each other on many levels, it is safe to say most religions would be, at least partially, factually inaccurate.

Meaning that if you judge indoctrination on the grounds of whether it is a fact or not, then most of the time it is undoubtedly religious indoctrination, even if you can't determine which is which.

True to a point.

Its important to remember I was working with Magic's premises which I dont necessarily agree with.

If we accept the premise that teaching as a fact something that is not is indoctrination, then I am sure all parents have indoctrinated their kids, not just religious ones.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
Not exactly. A fact is something that can be proven.

You have said this several times without one single proof.

I on the other hand already presented you both the oxford and the merriam webster dictionary telling you that if something exists or is true, it is enough for it to be a fact.

I am waiting for the proof. Ironically, you never deliver it when cornered for it.
 

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
But who were you talking to? I'm just curious, because I haven't seen any comments that claimed what you were arguing against.

I brought it up because I ran into the phrase a few times in the past couple of days. I thought maybe it was in this thread, but maybe it was in an another one. I wasn't quoting anyone, so I wasn't expecting anyone to take it personally. And some people do believe it.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
You have said this several times without one single proof.

I on the other hand already presented you both the oxford and the merriam webster dictionary telling you that if something exists or is true, it is enough for it to be a fact.

I am waiting for the proof. Ironically, you never deliver it when cornered for it.

Prove it.

I didn't realize this wasn't common knowledge. What is a fact? It's something that's objectively true, right? Well, how do we know it's true?
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
I didn't realize this wasn't common knowledge. What is a fact? It's something that's objectively true, right? Well, how do we know it's true?

A fact is something that is true , yes. On the other hand many things are true without having been proven true.

So I cannot give you scientific evidence nor I care to. I know it's true and I plan to pass it on. You may freely believe it is indoctrination, but you cannot evidence that beyond all doubt unless you prove it is not a fact (in other words, unless you prove it is not true) that god/s exists.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
Then it's not a fact.
.

It only needs to be true to be a fact.

What you are saying is that before we had the means to prove the Earth was round is wasnt true because we were unable to prove it.


Then I guess the word is useless and we'll have to stop using it altogether.

Thats your prerrogative. For starters your use of it is different than the one in the oxford and the merriam, so there is that.
 
Top