So you have no evidence for your position. Thank you.Nope. Only logic, in which others' arguments, suggesting that religious indoctrination is bad or worse than not instilling religious preference, lacks
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So you have no evidence for your position. Thank you.Nope. Only logic, in which others' arguments, suggesting that religious indoctrination is bad or worse than not instilling religious preference, lacks
This doesn't follow. God's existence is not a fact. It is a belief. A fact is "the earth is a sphere", something that has enough evidence to prove. You don't have to prove the opposite of a claim for the original claim to not be a fact.
What is this in response to? I haven't seen anyone make any claims to which this response would be relevant.
Of course not, because you and me disagree about several facts.
For me, consciousness in everything is a fact, you think it is not a fact.
So me teaching my kids the facts I know would not be indoctrination, because they are facts that I know and am imparting upon them.
You believe it is because you believe they are not facts.
As such, we cant objectively know if it is indoctrination or not.
fact: definition of fact in Oxford dictionary (British & World English)
Fact - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Religions, for the most part, are not run by a sociopath/narcissist like Jim Jones.
And who says religions teach gay hatred?
(I now refuse to use the term homophobia, because it does not accurately describe the phenomena). When I say "indoctrinate", I mean teaching kids to say their prayers or whatever.
Facts are simply things that are true. Whether there is scientific evidence for them or not is irrelevant for their status as facts.
For example, it is a fact I am sitting at my bed right now. You may not believe it and I have no way of proving it to you, but it is a fact.
God is likewise. You just dont believe in it, but you disbelief does not make it not a fact.
Interestingly, given that religions contradict each other on many levels, it is safe to say most religions would be, at least partially, factually inaccurate.
Meaning that if you judge indoctrination on the grounds of whether it is a fact or not, then most of the time it is undoubtedly religious indoctrination, even if you can't determine which is which.
Suffice it to say I wasn't talking to you.
Not exactly. A fact is something that can be proven.
Prove it.A fact is something that can be proven.
Prove it.
But who were you talking to? I'm just curious, because I haven't seen any comments that claimed what you were arguing against.
Then it's not a fact. Case closed.Tried it already, he ignores this
You have said this several times without one single proof.
I on the other hand already presented you both the oxford and the merriam webster dictionary telling you that if something exists or is true, it is enough for it to be a fact.
I am waiting for the proof. Ironically, you never deliver it when cornered for it.
Prove it.
We don't in general. Facts are true by definition. Whether something is a fact or not is not something we are typically able to determine.Well, how do we know it's true?
I didn't realize this wasn't common knowledge. What is a fact? It's something that's objectively true, right? Well, how do we know it's true?
So you have no evidence for your position. Thank you.
We don't in general.
Facts are true by definition. Whether something is a fact or not is not something we are typically able to determine.
Is that a fact?Whether something is a fact or not is not something we are typically able to determine.
Then it's not a fact.
.
Then I guess the word is useless and we'll have to stop using it altogether.