KnightOwl
Member
I am saying that by the most basic definition of Shariah the cases where hudud is enforced is impermissible or illegal (KSA Iran).
So if it is impermissible and illegal, the perps were arrested and convicted, right?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am saying that by the most basic definition of Shariah the cases where hudud is enforced is impermissible or illegal (KSA Iran).
with any other political system, but I do not see a problem with Shariah law.do you NOT see a problem with integration of church and state?
I could care less about with any other political system, but I do not see a problem with Shariah law.
Here's my point. If I put on a t-shirt that identifies me as an atheist, and walk down a street in most Muslim-dominated places, I would not be safe.
That's horrible, and explains why you don't meet a lot of public ex-Muslims. The ones you hear of are very brave, and live with 24-hour security.
Either post an argument or don't I'm not going to shift through some idiotic site.
Well, I'm just glad I have my Gita.
I recently heard an ABC Radio National (Aus) interview with a Pakistani Muslim Professor of Economics who had been living in Washington for the past twelve years. He was being pressed by the interviewer on the barbarity of Shariah law and the amputation of the hands of thieves. The Professor patiently explained that some five or six repeat offenders receive such punishment in Pakistan while in the US some 28, 000 citizens are killed each year by fire arms. He had no hesitation in letting his wife and daughter go out at night in Pakistan...but in Washington would not dream of letting them go out unaccompanied even in daylight.
In the U.S. for 2006, there were 30,896 deaths from firearms
The number of non-fatal injuries is considerable--over 200,000 per year
FIREARMS TUTORIAL
Here's my point...If I put on non descript clothes that do not identify me as belonging to anything, and walk down a street in most US Cities, I would not be safe...There is a good chance I could end up as one of the 230,896 firearms victims or one of the millions of victims of lesser crimes.
That's horrible, and explains why people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
You should note that the US is a notable exception among developed countries. Other such countries are very much safer.
I wonder how many are killed by firearms (and bombs) in Pakistan..
I think the professor's comparison is dishonest. He might have noted that suicide bombings are rare in the US. Also, he did not address the barbarity of the amputations.
Here's my point...If I put on non descript clothes that do not identify me as belonging to anything, and walk down a street in most US Cities, I would not be safe...There is a good chance I could end up as one of the 230,896 firearms victims or one of the millions of victims of lesser crimes.