why some of arabs hate USA?

[.lava]

yes i am aware of all that, i appologise if my post was kind of inclusive of all the people. i am not saying that i hate all australians, i'm just anoyed by people like darkendless who after 8 years of war still don't know whats going on.

yet it sounds like you hate all Americans and all Australians. maybe it would be better not to use names that represent millions of people with different opinions as you generalize. it would make easier for others to understand what you stand against. if it is supporter of wars, then you should say it. but names like 'Americans' contain more than those who support war on Islam. they are always bunch of people with power that make masses suffer.






.

 

[Gharib]

but what is your reason for hatred , tell us, make it clear.

the reason for my hatread is due to the killing of the innocent muslim people, hate and propaganda towards my religion.

 

[kai]

i guess so.



your choice is unfair then.

my choice is no nuclear weapons. you dissagree?

 

[Gharib]

yet it sounds like you hate all Americans and all Australians. maybe it would be better not to use names that represent millions of people with different opinions as you generalize. it would make easier for others to understand what you stand against. if it is supporter of wars, then you should say it. but names like 'Americans' contain more than those who support war on Islam. they are always bunch of people with power that make masses suffer.






.

will do sis. i'll stop with the generalisation and mentione the specific group of people i will be talking about. thanks for pointing that out.

 

[kai]

the reason for my hatread is due to the killing of the innocent muslim people, hate and propaganda towards my religion.

so you hate all people that kill innocent Muslims thats understandable does that included Muslims who blow up markets etc purposefully targeting Muslims?

 

[Gharib]

my choice is no nuclear weapons. you dissagree?

no i don't, but the previous statement was different to this and seemed unfair.

 

[Gharib]

so you hate all people that kill innocent Muslims thats understandable does that included Muslims who blow up markets etc purposefully targeting Muslims?

yes that includes them, that also includes non muslims killing other innocent non muslims, the powerfull oppresing the weak, etc. etc.

 

[Madhuri]

will do sis. i'll stop with the generalisation and mentione the specific group of people i will be talking about. thanks for pointing that out.

From now on just say 'rednecks'
I'm probably going to get in trouble for this...

 

[Gharib]

Eselam is not an Arab so i am intrigued about his reasons for hating Americans could it be his sole reason stems from him being a Muslim and taking on board Arab feelings towards the US and Israel

i just don't like injustice done to nobody and that view is as a result of me being a muslim. so your statement is probably correct.

 

[kai]

no i don't, but the previous statement was different to this and seemed unfair.

why ? how the heck are you goig to get rid of weapons that could destroy all of humanity if you let more countries have them? they are so terrifyingly powerful that they need to be cut down and finally erased not proliferated. Listen Iran doesnt need nuclear weapons why on earth would they?

 

[Gharib]

From now on just say 'rednecks'
I'm probably going to get in trouble for this...

no problem, you have to tell me who they are, i'm prety sure i've heard this somewhere, i just can't remember to who it reffers to.

 

[kai]

i just don't like injustice done to nobody and that view is as a result of me being a muslim. so your statement is probably correct.

well i hope you think a little more deeply in future about "people" before you express Hatred for them, most people think exactly the way you do about injustice muslim or not.



and i hope god forgives you for hating the English that probably makes you an honourary Frenchman :yes:

 

[.lava]

why ? how the heck are you goig to get rid of weapons that could destroy all of humanity if you let more countries have them? they are so terrifyingly powerful that they need to be cut down and finally erased not proliferated. Listen Iran doesnt need nuclear weapons why on earth would they?

i think if both nations have a nuclear weapon then both would hesitate to use it. yet if one side has it then other nation appears to be very weak. i believe this is why each wants to have it because there are nations who have it already. not that i like nations have that kind of massive killer weapons. but imagine Iran does not have nukes and USA sends a nuke to Iran. how would Iran going to respond? with bullet, burning flags...etc.? balance. that's what needed. they just do it in the wrong direction.





.

 

[Gharib]

why ? how the heck are you goig to get rid of weapons that could destroy all of humanity if you let more countries have them? they are so terrifyingly powerful that they need to be cut down and finally erased not proliferated. Listen Iran doesnt need nuclear weapons why on earth would they?

how can you say iran doesn't need nuclear weapons when all it's enemies countries have them? the question you should be asking is, why did these countries make them? they weren't in any kind of nuclear threat from anyone? they made them first and now are condemning those that do want to make them for protection.

it's all countries have them or all countries don't. and since the ones that have them are keeping them then iran should also make them for itself. and there should be no one against this. it's all in or all out, Kai. so instead of being against iran making them, you might want to be against the US for having them, if iran makes them then the US decieds to destroy it's own, then iran will do the same.

 

[Gharib]

well i hope you think a little more deeply in future about "people" before you express Hatred for them, most people think exactly the way you do about injustice muslim or not.

alright, i'll rememebr that for the future.

and i hope god forgives you for hating the English that probably makes you an honourary Frenchman :yes:

what, me a frenchie, you've got to be kidding . i hate the french government even more than the english.

 

[Gharib]

i think if both nations have a nuclear weapon then both would hesitate to use it. yet if one side has it then other nation appears to be very weak. i believe this is why each wants to have it because there are nations who have it already. not that i like nations have that kind of massive killer weapons. but imagine Iran does not have nukes and USA sends a nuke to Iran. how would Iran going to respond? with bullet, burning flags...etc.? balance. that's what needed. they just do it in the wrong direction.
.

i totally agree with this. thats why it's either all have them or none have them. that way no one can use them.

 

[kai]

i think if both nations have a nuclear weapon then both would hesitate to use it. yet if one side has it then other nation appears to be very weak. i believe this is why each wants to have it because there are nations who have it already. not that i like nations have that kind of massive killer weapons. but imagine Iran does not have nukes and USA sends a nuke to Iran. how would Iran going to respond? with bullet, burning flags...etc.? balance. that's what needed. they just do it in the wrong direction.





.

the USA is not going to Nuke anybody. Its a doomsday weapon . it needs eradicating Lava not proliferating. This fear is what drove men to deploy them in the first place.


Tell me is this Iranian policy to have nukes because i was under the impression that they claim they dont.

 

[kai]

i totally agree with this. thats why it's either all have them or none have them. that way no one can use them.

well its a good job Serbia didnt have them isnt it esalam?

 

[Madhuri]

the USA is not going to Nuke anybody. Its a doomsday weapon . it needs eradicating Lava not proliferating. This fear is what drove men to deploy them in the first place.

Hmm, not sure that I agree with this statement. The USA could easily use their nukes if they feel threatened enough or justified enough. They have in the past and could again. All you need are some global changes and new people in power. It doesn't take very long for culture, attitudes and policy to change.

 

[Gharib]

well its a good job Serbia didnt have them isnt it esalam?

they weren't going to use them even if they did have them. but still it's good that they don't have them coz we don't too.