• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Will Atheists & Polyheists burn in Hell according to Bible?

jeager106

Learning more about Jehovah.
Premium Member
This is "Gehenna" not hades. Do you understand what Gehenna meant to a Jew? It doesn't mean what you think it does.

Matthew 10:28: “Do not become fearful of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; but rather be in fear of him that can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna.” (Erroneously translated "hell" in some Bibles)

Souls are not tortured in Gehenna...they are "destroyed". This was a reference to the city's garbage dump outside Jerusalem's walls where fires were kept burning day and night with the addition of brimstone (sulphur). The carcasses of dead animals and the bodies of executed criminals were cast into the flames for disposal....they were completely destroyed. What the flames missed...the maggots finished off. Nothing alive was ever cast in there. To a Jew it meant having no memorial tomb from which to be resurrected. They understood what Jesus meant.

The "lake of fire" mentioned in the Revelation was not a place of conscious torment either. It is rightly called "the second death" because unlike the first death, there is no way out of this place. It too means everlasting death.

God is not a fiend....he does not need to torture anyone. What would be the point? Punishment was always meant to lead to repentance...it was never meted out just for the sake of it.



Those who fail to comply with the commands of God and the teachings of his Christ, will undergo everlasting punishment....but it is everlasting death....nothing more. The highest penalty a person could suffer under the law was death. There was no torture or confinement under hard labor ever meted out to Jewish offenders under God's law. So why should we expect God to transgress his own standards of justice and punish the wicked eternally, for a short lifetime of sin? The punishment is contrary to Jehovah's perfect justice.

Those who stole worked to compensate their victims...those who committed capital offences, suffered the death penalty, regardless of how repentant they were. Their repentance was something that counted at their resurrection, when even the "unrighteous" are raised with the "righteous". (John 5:28, 29) The wicked can expect to sleep in death forever. Only Jehovah and his son know who they are. We are not their judges.


Gee, JayDeeDee, I thought all serious Bible students knew what you just posted.
I found a nice, clearly worded, article so the poster would easily understand the difference between a lesson by parable, metaphore, and literal and HOW the bible makes meaning.
I do understand why people get confused by just reading a few passages without understanding what the message is.
Clergy have been misleading believers in this way for centuries.
Why else would some fundamentalists play with a basket of rattlesnake to "prove" their god protects them.
Oh, they get bitten sometimes? Darn!
 
Student of the Bible vs. people who read the Bible.
Bible students know how to recognize a lesson in parable and a lesson to be taken literally.

Take your time, read and digest this:
The Rich Man and Lazarus | Amazing Facts
You will come to understand HOW the Bible makes meaning.
What you quoted isn't at all a story about some rich dude and some poor guy.
Study, versus read.

You can believe whatever you like but why would Jesus suggest in his parable that people are tormented in hell instead of destroyed like you suggest in the first place? Why are there multiple verses that threaten that the wicked will endure eternal punishment? Isn't that a VERY odd way to say someone will be destroyed, killed, erased, annihilated? When someone is convicted of crime in the real world and sentenced to death does the judge ever say the convicted is sentenced to endure eternal punishment or does the judge say the convicted is sentenced to death? This isn't rocket science. There is a verse that compares hell to a furnace and clearly states the people thrown there will weep and gnash their teeth. There is another verse about hell, contributed to jesus I believe, were he says something about the worm will never die, basically saying in poetic fashion that those condemned to hell will endure it forever. The Catholic Church (the ones who got Christianity going) taught for centuries that hell is a real place where people are tormented and tortured. Its great that you don't want to believe in or worship a god that would torture people but the god described in the bible is a god that wouldn't think twice about torturing people. The god of the bible isn't a nice guy, sorry.
 

JayJayDee

Avid JW Bible Student
The several verses that I referenced never mentioned Gehenna as a picture of the final state of the lost. What is clear from these verses is the tenses of the verbs are continuous and that the subjects in the context are conscious.

Please provide scriptural references for this assertion. Everlasting death is continuous and also fits your definition. But the ancient Jews did not beliebve in an immortal soul, so there can be no consciousness in death. (Eccl 9:5, 6 10.) When we breathe our last, we no longer have thought processes. (Psalm 146:4) How can a soul fail to think if it still lives? How can it not love?

Meaning that the duration of damnation is as everlasting as the duration of redemption and those are equally aware in both.
Yes, exactly. Everlasting death is the opposite of everlasting life. This is what the Bible teaches.
Gehenna is a death from which no one returns. The lake of fire is also a symbol of everlasting destruction.

The punishment is eternal because the sins of those condemned have not and will never be paid for before the Eternal, Holy, and Just God.

Why does God need to keep the wicked alive only to torture them forever. This is not the conduct of a loving God. And the punishment does not fit the crime. The whole idea is contrary to God's perfect justice.

Are souls annihilated (destroyed)? or forever asleep? It is neither.

The wicked are destroyed. (John 3:16) And the sleep of death even for the unrighteous is not forever.
Just as Jesus woke Lazarus from his "sleep" so Jesus will awaken the dead. (John 11:11-14)

Paul wrote....

"13 But we do not want you to be uninformed, brethren, about those who are asleep, so that you will not grieve as do the rest who have no hope. 14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus. 15 For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. 16 For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. " (1 Thess 4:13-16 NASB)

According to Paul, no one is raised until "the coming of the Lord"...Those "dead in Christ" (anointed Christians) were to rise "first"....so that means all were to "sleep" in their graves until Christ returned to take them "home".

Your definition of death is incorrect. Physical death is separation of the soul from the body. Spiritual death (the second death) is separation of the soul from God.

Scriptural references please. According to Ezek 18:4....souls die. Solomon said that humans have no advantage over animals when it comes to dying. (Eccl 3:19, 20)

However you stated "There is no teaching of an immortal soul in the Bible." therefore according to your position the "Blessed hope" is that all, whether saved or not, will be evaporated.

Not at all!

The "blessed hope" that is laid out in the Bible, does not rely on an immortal soul......it relies on the resurrection. There are two different ones spoken about in the scriptures. The "first resurrection" is for those who will rule with Christ in his kingdom. (Rev 20:6) Only those with "the heavenly calling' (Heb 3:1) are privileged to have that hope.
And as Paul states above, they do not rise until Christ's return, so they were all to "sleep in death" until that time. Why is that so hard to understand? Is being asleep such a bad thing? Can you imagine those we have lost in death, up in heaven looking down on us and being heartbroken at what is taking place down here, with no way to stop it. if that were the case, how could heaven be a happy place?

The other resurrection takes place on earth. Jesus calls "both the righteous and the unrighteous" from their graves, back to mortal human life on earth. (John 5:28, 29) These then have the services of heavenly kings and priests to guide and direct them on the road to life. The kingdom rules for 1,000 years, after which things will return to the way they were before Adam sinned.

The whole purpose of God's kingdom is to reconcile fallen mankind with God through Christ's ransom. A relatively small number of Christians go to heaven and the rest will enjoy life on earth in paradise conditions under their rulership. How is that not a happy prospect? The first paradise was here on earth and this is where God put us. If he had wanted us in heaven, why didn't he just create us there?
 

Maponos

Welcome to the Opera
Pagan hell?

Technically there is such a place in Greek mythology- Tartarus, a sort of 'sub-world' of Hades where those who were truly bad in life go. I'm not sure if it was added later into the mythology, but it's there.
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
Technically there is such a place in Greek mythology- Tartarus, a sort of 'sub-world' of Hades where those who were truly bad in life go. I'm not sure if it was added later into the mythology, but it's there.
Mmm, I keep forgetting about the place Zeus locked away the Titans. There's also Nastrond. But both of them are more "this is where we keep monsters" than truly "this was designed to punish bad people" areas.
 

truthofscripture

Active Member
My dear jewish and christian friends of RF. Do u believe what bible says that disbelievers from muslims, atheists and polytheists will be roasted in hell?

Yes or no and why
No one will "roast in hell", since as far as the scriptures are concerned, they indicate pretty clearly that hell is the same as sheol and hades: the common grave of mankind. The concept of a burning fiery hell comes from false religions and from Dante's Inferno, a work of fiction, and from pagan religions. Pagans have always believed that we have an immortal "soul", but the scriptures teach the opposite. They teach that soul and life are synonyms, not two separate parts of us. The scriptures say that nothing survives death, and that our thoughts do perish. They say that Adam, the first man, BECAME a living soul, not that he was given a soul.
 

Vishvavajra

Active Member
The Bible is not unclear on this subject. Those who reject Christ are condemned to eternal punishment in the lake of unquenchable fire. Matt.25:31-46, Matt.3:12, Jn.5:28-29, Matt.13:41-42, 49-50, Mark 16:16, Rev.20:14-15, Rev.21:8. But God has provided the way of escape through repentance of our hostility towards Him and faith in Christ alone for salvation.
So it's a protection racket, then.
 

Vishvavajra

Active Member
The several verses that I referenced never mentioned Gehenna as a picture of the final state of the lost. What is clear from these verses is the tenses of the verbs are continuous and that the subjects in the context are conscious. Meaning that the duration of damnation is as everlasting as the duration of redemption and those are equally aware in both.
That's not how Greek works.

The punishment is eternal because the sins of those condemned have not and will never be paid for before the Eternal, Holy, and Just God.
Anselmian rubbish. This theory was invented in the 12th century. What do you suppose Christians believed before that? Moreover, a god who behaved in that way would be neither holy nor just. It's sadistic, and belief in this sort of thing does not speak well of people.

Are souls annihilated (destroyed)? or forever asleep? It is neither. Your definition of death is incorrect. Physical death is separation of the soul from the body. Spiritual death (the second death) is separation of the soul from God. However you stated "There is no teaching of an immortal soul in the Bible." therefore according to your position the "Blessed hope" is that all, whether saved or not, will be evaporated.
Paul says that the soul is mortal, as is all that is born. Yet there is resurrection. In being so literal-minded, you've failed to grasp the mystery.
 

Rick B

Active Member
Premium Member
Please provide scriptural references for this assertion. Everlasting death is continuous and also fits your definition. But the ancient Jews did not beliebve in an immortal soul, so there can be no consciousness in death. (Eccl 9:5, 6 10.) When we breathe our last, we no longer have thought processes. (Psalm 146:4) How can a soul fail to think if it still lives? How can it not love?


Yes, exactly. Everlasting death is the opposite of everlasting life. This is what the Bible teaches.
Gehenna is a death from which no one returns. The lake of fire is also a symbol of everlasting destruction.



Why does God need to keep the wicked alive only to torture them forever. This is not the conduct of a loving God. And the punishment does not fit the crime. The whole idea is contrary to God's perfect justice.



The wicked are destroyed. (John 3:16) And the sleep of death even for the unrighteous is not forever.
Just as Jesus woke Lazarus from his "sleep" so Jesus will awaken the dead. (John 11:11-14)

Paul wrote....

"13 But we do not want you to be uninformed, brethren, about those who are asleep, so that you will not grieve as do the rest who have no hope. 14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus. 15 For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. 16 For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. " (1 Thess 4:13-16 NASB)

According to Paul, no one is raised until "the coming of the Lord"...Those "dead in Christ" (anointed Christians) were to rise "first"....so that means all were to "sleep" in their graves until Christ returned to take them "home".



Scriptural references please. According to Ezek 18:4....souls die. Solomon said that humans have no advantage over animals when it comes to dying. (Eccl 3:19, 20)



Not at all!

The "blessed hope" that is laid out in the Bible, does not rely on an immortal soul......it relies on the resurrection. There are two different ones spoken about in the scriptures. The "first resurrection" is for those who will rule with Christ in his kingdom. (Rev 20:6) Only those with "the heavenly calling' (Heb 3:1) are privileged to have that hope.
And as Paul states above, they do not rise until Christ's return, so they were all to "sleep in death" until that time. Why is that so hard to understand? Is being asleep such a bad thing? Can you imagine those we have lost in death, up in heaven looking down on us and being heartbroken at what is taking place down here, with no way to stop it. if that were the case, how could heaven be a happy place?

The other resurrection takes place on earth. Jesus calls "both the righteous and the unrighteous" from their graves, back to mortal human life on earth. (John 5:28, 29) These then have the services of heavenly kings and priests to guide and direct them on the road to life. The kingdom rules for 1,000 years, after which things will return to the way they were before Adam sinned.

The whole purpose of God's kingdom is to reconcile fallen mankind with God through Christ's ransom. A relatively small number of Christians go to heaven and the rest will enjoy life on earth in paradise conditions under their rulership. How is that not a happy prospect? The first paradise was here on earth and this is where God put us. If he had wanted us in heaven, why didn't he just create us there?

There have been many good points made in these posts e.g. it is true that men were created " a living soul". Most references to men as "soul" refer to the whole being of man. So it is more proper to view a person as a immaterial soul possessing a physical body. But that there is a "dualism" can be confirmed in places such as Matt.10:28 "Do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell." BTW "destroy" here (as well as Jn.3:15-16) is apollumi "The idea is not extinction but ruin, loss, not of being but of well-being". "The loss of well-being in the case of the unsaved hereafter" 3c Strong's Exhaustive Concordance see also TDNT-1:394, 67, BAGD-95a, THAYER-64c.

You state: "But the ancient Jews did not beliebve(sic) in an immortal soul, so there can be no consciousness in death." To assert that because the "ancient Jews did not believe" as an example of your final authority does not speak well of your foundation for the "ancient Jews" were notoriously an unbelieving people o God's revelation.

You may question: "Why does God need to keep the wicked alive only to torture them forever. This is not the conduct of a loving God. And the punishment does not fit the crime. The whole idea is contrary to God's perfect justice." But if you would have addressed the Scriptures I referenced instead of fleeing to Old Testament texts you could not avoid the clear admonition of our Lord Jesus Christ in Matt.25:31-46. "These will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” v.46

Matt.3:12 "His winnowing fork is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clear His threshing floor; and He will gather His wheat into the barn, but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”

Matt.13:41-42, 49-50 "The Son of Man will send forth His angels, and they will gather out of His kingdom all stumbling blocks, and those who commit lawlessness,42 and will throw them into the furnace of fire; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.49 So it will be at end of the age; the angels will come forth and take out the wicked from among the righteous,50 and will throw them into the furnace of fire; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (ongoing conscious punishment)

Rev.21 "5 And He who sits on the throne said, “Behold, I am making all things new.” And He said, “Write, for these words are faithful and true.”6 Then He said to me It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give to the one who thirsts from the spring of the water of life without cost. 7 He who overcomes will inherit these things, and I will be his God and he will be My son. 8 But for the cowardly and unbelieving and abominable and murderers and immoral persons and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.” (The second death is the ongoing, conscious punishment for unredeemed sinners separated from the presence of God and the redeemed) My definition of death has scriptural warrant.

You state: "Solomon said that humans have no advantage over animals when it comes to dying. (Eccl 3:19, 20) That is true when your worldview is the one Solomon is presenting in this book as the common one espoused by mankind alienated from God. The theme of this book is repeatedly stated for instance: Eccl.1:1 "Vanity of vanities,” says the Preacher, “Vanity of vanities! All is vanity.” and "14 I have seen all the works which have been done under the sun, and behold, all is vanity and striving after wind." The Futility of All Endeavor, The Futility of Wisdom, The Futility of Pleasure and Possessions,The Futility of Labor,The Folly of Riches . All is vane and futile resulting in skepticism, cynicism and hedonism if your hope is only in this life (under the sun). Eccl.6:11 "For there are many words which increase futility. What then is the advantage to a man? 12 For who knows what is good for a man during his lifetime, during the few years of his futile life? He will spend them like a shadow. For who can tell a man what will be after him under the sun?" After the Preacher - Solomon - discourses over 12 chapters describing the futility of a earthly focused life resulting in despair, to all to whom this sermon applies, he gives his verdict and his remedy - "12:13 The conclusion, when all has been heard, is: fear God and keep His commandments, because this applies to every person. 14 For God will bring every act to judgment, everything which is hidden, whether it is good or evil."

Now I ask you again. If, as you assert, "There is no teaching of an immortal soul in the Bible." How do you respond to the vast amount of Biblical evidence to the contrary? No matter how one defines the intermediate state between physical death and the bodily resurrection e.g. the rich man and Lazarus prior to the resurrection of Christ, and for Christians subsequent to the resurrection of Christ as immediate. (2Cor.5:6 "Therefore, being always of good courage, and knowing that while we are at home in the body we are absent from the Lord 7 for we walk by faith not by sight 8 we are of good courage, I say, and prefer rather to be absent from the body and to be at home with the Lord."

There is no waiting time for Christians at death to be "present with the Lord". And there is no Scriptural warrant for a "special class" of 144,000 to experience His presence at death or at His coming.

1 Cor.15:50 Now I say this, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. 51 Behold, I tell you a mystery; we will not all sleep, but we will all be changed, 52 in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet; for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. 53 For this perishable must put on the imperishable, and this mortal must put on immortality. 54 But when this perishable will have put on the imperishable, and this mortal will have put on immortality, then will come about the saying that is written, “Death is swallowed up in victory. 55 O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?” 56 The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law; 57 but thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.

Vishvavajra's response to mankind's ruin and God's remedy perfectly illustrates the innate rebellion in man's heart. God reveals man's lost condition through Scripture and in his conscience. If rejected? "For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing" 1Cor.1:18a If received? "But to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor.1:18b
 

Parsiba

New Member
Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Yes there is hell. Guru Amardass ji The Third Guru Explains :

ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਮਨਿ ਤਨਿ ਦੁਖੁ ਪਾਇਆ ॥

Naam Visaar Man Than Dhukh Paaeiaa ||

नामु विसारि मनि तनि दुखु पाइआ ॥

Forgetting the Naam, the Name of the Lord, the mind and body suffer in pain.

45627 ਮਾਰੂ ਸੋਲਹੇ (ਮ: ੩) ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ : ਅੰਗ ੧੦੬੪ ਪੰ. ੮
Raag Maaroo Guru Amar Das



ਮਾਇਆ ਮੋਹੁ ਸਭੁ ਰੋਗੁ ਕਮਾਇਆ ॥

Maaeiaa Mohu Sabh Rog Kamaaeiaa ||

माइआ मोहु सभु रोगु कमाइआ ॥

Attached to the love of Maya, he earns nothing but disease.

45628 ਮਾਰੂ ਸੋਲਹੇ (ਮ: ੩) ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ : ਅੰਗ ੧੦੬੪ ਪੰ. ੮
Raag Maaroo Guru Amar Das



ਬਿਨੁ ਨਾਵੈ ਮਨੁ ਤਨੁ ਹੈ ਕੁਸਟੀ ਨਰਕੇ ਵਾਸਾ ਪਾਇਦਾ ॥੯॥

Bin Naavai Man Than Hai Kusattee Narakae Vaasaa Paaeidhaa ||9||

बिनु नावै मनु तनु है कुसटी नरके वासा पाइदा ॥९॥

Without the Name, his mind and body are afflicted with leprosy, and he obtains his home in hell. ||9||

45629 ਮਾਰੂ ਸੋਲਹੇ (ਮ: ੩) ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ : ਅੰਗ ੧੦੬੪ ਪੰ. ੮
Raag Maaroo Guru Amar Das

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
You can believe whatever you like but why would Jesus suggest in his parable that people are tormented in hell instead of destroyed like you suggest in the first place? Why are there multiple verses that threaten that the wicked will endure eternal punishment?... The god of the bible isn't a nice guy, sorry.

So why would anyone worship a God whom you have to fear of offending and would send you on a fast track to eternal torment and punishment? That sounds a bit sado-masochistic. It's really disturbing how some Christians pretend to know more about the God of the Bible than Jews, to whom the Bible really belongs. Stop reading Paul and John (but you can listen to their music :D) and read books like Daniel.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
I'm sure you would prefer the god of your imagination that doesn't require the just recompense for your sins rather than face a Holy and Just God who must satisfy the penalty required for the violation of His moral law. By refusing His means of escape (which requires your total submission to His authority as Creator and Judge as well as complete trust in Christ' Person and work) you willingly choose to accept the forewarned consequences because you view it more desirable than bowing the knee to Christ.

Ever read Milton?
 

FunctionalAtheist

Hammer of Reason
"Eskimo: 'If I did not know about God and sin, would I go to hell?' Priest: 'No, not if you did not know.' Eskimo: 'Then why did you tell me?"
Annie Dillard
Love it. If god really loved everyone, he would never have let anyone know he existed so no one could fight for him, no one could die for him, no one could burn in hell for him.
 

FunctionalAtheist

Hammer of Reason
Also it's not bravery to think you have the right to judge people's relationship with God, It's arrogance.
Some would call it neither brave nor arrogant, but rational. I don't consider someones relationship with god different from anyone's relationship with any other invisible, non-detectible friend.
 

FunctionalAtheist

Hammer of Reason
You would not know right from wrong in the Bible when discussing these more sublime ideas. Nor do you even know how Christianity may be properly spoken of or taught. Who told you the Bible is the be all and end of all of what Jesus Christ intended for man to know?

Also, how can you be so bold to try to pick away at Christian teachings and truths when you are so weak or unable to defend your own faith? Islam is absent when being asked to debate the truth. Absent when being asked to show empirical evidence for the god. Absent of miracles, saints, and charity towards those who do not believe as they do.

And you are pretty much out of touch on the subject of hell. When you say unbelievers of the Christian faith are destined for hell, you either lie or you are ignorant. IMO
Haha love this. Your defense of your biblical interpretation is that no one could possibly know right from wrong when reading the bible. LMAO!
 
Top