No way, it was not sarcasm. Itr true mate. Many things to learn from you.
Well thankyou very much! I hope we all can learn from each other.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No way, it was not sarcasm. Itr true mate. Many things to learn from you.
By claiming Messiah and Imam-Mahdi, as you know, the truthful prophet had prophesied. Right?Really? by claiming prophet-hood?
Based on your prior interpretation of this passage as referring to Jews and Christians, does this mean that every Muslim says 46 times a day 'God is angry at the Jews'?
Since Judaism people instead of accepting a truthful prophet of messenger, they opposed them. Like they opposed Jesus and attempted to kill him on the Cross, while he only wanted to reform Judaism and to bring them back on the truthful teachings of Moses.
The Muslims pray 46 times a day that when reformation of Islam is done by the coming of Messiah and or Imam-Mahdi, they won't deny him and accept him.
This is what the world wants that Islam should be reformed and is peaceful as it was originally in the time of Muhammad. Right?
Regards
The Jewish scripture has enough testimony in the affirmative.So is God angry at the Jews?
If Islam is totalitarian then Islamic empires should be totalitarian. Or were they not Islamic?
You seem to be implying that there is an objective "true Islam" that exists independently of the practice of Muslims and the governance of Islamic polities.
I want you to offer some evidence as to why people should consider Islam totalitarian.
Which of these empires 'earned the descriptor' totalitarian btw?
I think you are just throwing around the label 'totalitarian' without recourse to its meaning and historical usage.
Given that the powers of an Islamic government would be clearly limited by a codified set of laws that even the leader must adhere to, given that Islam doesn't mandate a centralised economy, given that it doesn't mandate total government control over the mass media, given that it doesn't mandate a comprehensive system of secret police and domestic surveillance, given that it prohibits arbitrary detention and execution, I don't really get the label totalitarian.
There is no comprehensive "core ideology" independent of how people interpret it. Islam is as Muslims do and believe.
You seem to be claiming that you know the "Objective True Islam". If you were making a claim that some fundamentalist interpretations could be described as totalitarian then you might be able to make a reasonable argument in favour. When you don't qualify it though then it seems that you are saying people like Tariq Ramadan don't understand "core Islam", but people like you and IS do.
Islam has constantly evolved throughout its history and requires a large amount of subjective interpretation. There are countless varieties of Islam that are all "Islam".
Is it not a bit arrogant to tell the hundreds of millions of Muslims who are not totalitarian that they are basically 'wrong' and don't really follow "core Islam"? I don't get why some people seem to want to insist that the extremists have it right, and the rest of them are not really 'proper' Muslims.
That's a bit of an understatementThat's a bit of an overstatement.
By claiming Messiah and Imam-Mahdi, as you know, the truthful prophet had prophesied. Right?
Regards
Enough for one to wonder how the theology works, certainly.The Jewish scripture has enough testimony in the affirmative.
Regards
We are well within Islam rather in the core of Islam, as Muhammad had prophesied for coming of Messiah and Imam Mahdi in his ummah as successor to him.You mean Mirza has prophicised that he himself will be a prophet? was he claiming to be a prophet or just to be prophet incarnation? oh wait! are we still talking about Islam or about other religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.?
Today, we are living the Muslim Reformation. It has been ongoing for the last 100 years.
It began when the Ottoman Empire disintegrated and the Saudi tribe once more conquered the Arabian Peninsula; again sacking and looting and capturing Mecca and Medina; and finally opening the Gates of Ijtihad with their new Wahhabist heresy unopposed by the normative Sunni Islam Empire. There was no more Sultan or Caliph to oppose them.
Since that time, every demagogic faction, tribe, cult, sect, clan, and country has been killing each other over who has the Best Flavor of Allah. It has grown to a world wide slaughter of Arabs and Muslims mainly murdering each other in the Name of Their particular death god.
Christians did the same thing 500 years ago and obliterated tens of millions of Christian Europeans and much of Europe.
Jews did the same thing 2,000 years ago and obliterated millions of Jews; their Holy Temple; and the Kingdom of Israel.
If the Muslims continue in the same manner, hundreds of millions (or billions) will die and portions of planet Earth will be left uninhabitable.
There was no more Sultan or Caliph to oppose them.
Since that time, every demagogic faction, tribe, cult, sect, clan, and country has been killing each other over who has the Best Flavor of Allah. It has grown to a world wide slaughter of Arabs and Muslims mainly murdering each other in the Name of Their particular death god.
I am not aware of this Jewish massacre you mention. Would you be willing to give me a hint?Christians did the same thing 500 years ago and obliterated tens of millions of Christian Europeans and much of Europe.
Jews did the same thing 2,000 years ago and obliterated millions of Jews; their Holy Temple; and the Kingdom of Israel.
If the Muslims continue in the same manner, hundreds of millions (or billions) will die and portions of planet Earth will be left uninhabitable.
Approximately 167 BCE, Mattisyahu, father of the "Maccabees," cut off the head of a Jew who was bowing down to the idol that that the Syrian-Greeks had erected in the Temple.Or to motivate them.
Relying on a central authority is inherently dangerous, as history shows all too painfully. People can't count on the luck of the dice of having a fair and merciful ruler to be virtuous and wise on their own stead.
I fear that is typical of any sufficiently numerous community that relies too much on god-concepts to personify their moral virtue and, worst of all, their responsibility of rule. They may well lack any choice, seeing how it is unusual for those communities to feel any duty to keep responsible population levels or to overcome nationalist feelings.
I am not aware of this Jewish massacre you mention. Would you be willing to give me a hint?
Would you settle for a supremacist, totalitarian, personality cult?Why would insulting their religion create a sudden desire amongst Muslims to reform Islam simply to please the people insulting their religion?
Would you settle for a supremacist, totalitarian, personality cult?
I do agree with you that it would change little as I believe that Islam cannot change.That has nothing to do with my point.
Do you believe that calling Islam totalitarian will miraculously lead to some sort of change? A bit like how calling IS daesh has got them running for the hills?
Just to make it more clear.
paarsurrey said: ↑
By claiming Messiah and Imam-Mahdi, as you know, the truthful prophet Muhammad had prophesied. Right?
We are well within Islam rather in the core of Islam, as Muhammad had prophesied for coming of Messiah and Imam Mahdi in his ummah as successor to him.
Regards
I am trying but, I am essentially an ADD non-productive "voice."I hate it when people say such nasty things I sometimes have to agree with. But will you help make a change?
Names of all the prophets are not mentioned by Quran:Prophet Mohamed said a Prophet will come after me and his name will be Mirza Gulam?