Father Heathen
Veteran Member
You got smacked down by facts and logic, son.Again just your opinion.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You got smacked down by facts and logic, son.Again just your opinion.
I see that you do not understand the difference between opinions and supportable claims. That explains a lot.Again just your opinion.
Again... If you distrust science then you have no business using medicine or technology. For now on pray your needs into existence.That "scientific analysis and consensus" is much like the bankruptcy bar's (of which I am a proud "member" since it's not official) "mutual admiration society" when professionals support each other's fees and praise work to the sky that they attacked weeks before.
No. I'm a realist. I see what goes on outside social media. You got smacked down by your own ignorance of what the real world shows outside the confines of the insulated world called the internet.You got smacked down by facts and logic, son.
Keep up the attacks with your ra ra supporters liking your posts.I see that you do not understand the difference between opinions and supportable claims. That explains a lot.
You can't play an 'Uno' reverse card against science.No. I'm a realist. I see what goes on outside social media. You got smacked down by your own ignorance of what the real world shows outside the confines of the insulated world called the internet.
Correcting is not attacking . You have been the only one correcting and running away..Keep up the attacks with your ra ra supporters liking your posts.
Doing a fine job of attacking people with nothing of substance whatsoever to show for it my fine gish gallop no trick ponyman.
Bye bye!
A realist follows the evidence. Where have you ever done that?No. I'm a realist. I see what goes on outside social media. You got smacked down by your own ignorance of what the real world shows outside the confines of the insulated world called the internet.
You're attacking, you've been attacking , and of course, you will continue attacking as well as your ra ra team .Correcting is not attacking . You have been the only one correcting and running away..
When a person repeatedly uses poor debating techniques everyone sees it sooner or later.
Here is something that you should seriously consider: Why can't you win this debate by using proper debating techniques? If one has to use improper debating techniques that is usually an indication that that person is wrong.
I watch what the leadership does both business and personal as signs of sincerity or as just a public face.A realist follows the evidence. Where have you ever done that?
To everyone else it looks as if you are merely looking for excuse. And many of your excuses are self contradictory.I watch what the leadership does both business and personal as signs of sincerity or as just a public face.
Leadership by example.
It's a sign of maturity and manhood to admit when one's wrong. I know that some might impulsively double down due to pride and/or embarrassment, but owning up to mistakes garners more respect and dignity.You're attacking, you've been attacking , and of course, you will continue attacking as well as your ra ra team .
But I can take it. Please continue your personal attacks disguised as correction.
Well, yes. Exactly.That's why you need leadership by example. Not a leadership going by just talking points and nothing else.
It makes sense right?Well, yes. Exactly.
How have the not led by personal example? You do realize that there are different pressures on being President than on others, don't you?It makes sense right?
I find those who lead by personal example, even if I don't agree, are far more intriguing than those who just expouse a position and personally does nothing themselves to support it.
Yes but if they themselves don't personally practice what they preach, who's going to respect that?How have the not led by personal example? You do realize that there are different pressures on being President than on others, don't you?
What makes you think that they do not do so? You have not given any examples. Give an example of how Biden is not practicing what he is preaching.Yes but if they themselves don't personally practice what they preach, who's going to respect that?
Well, as an example, Biden first expressed interest in electrifying "the beast" back in 2021. That would suit him in light of his green ambitions had it been accomplished and would have gone a long way to serve as a personal example of green commitment.What makes you think that they do not do so? You have not given any examples. Give an example of how Biden is not practicing what he is preaching.
Thank you. I was going to use just that example. So you want him to show his support by just making a show, not just doing what is best for the environment? Or does not excessively waste taxpayer money?Well, as an example, Biden first expressed interest in electrifying "the beast" back in 2021. That would suit him in light of his green ambitions had it been accomplished and would have gone a long way to serve as a personal example of green commitment.
Biden Wants to Electrify the Beast
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki says electrifying the presidential limo is "an objective" for Biden.www.caranddriver.com
But that hasn't been done yet. It just stays as an expressed desire with no real world example to show for it.
I persomally can't imagine a sitting president not being able to adequately order it to be done.
But he still to this day , rides around in fossil powered vehicles in spite of him saying it was an 'objective'.
To me , it's not practicing what is being preached.
Sorry I dont agree.Thank you. I was going to use just that example. So you want him to show his support by just making a show, not just doing what is best for the environment? Or does not excessively waste taxpayer money?
Let me explain. It takes a lot of taxpayer money to buy a new vehicle. It also takes years to build one. It has to be very secure. That vehicle was probably ordered during the Obama administration. It was delivered in 2017. It is massive and the amount of security in it was not developed overnight. It is bad for the environment to just throw away object and buy new ones ahead of time. In his personal life Biden does very very little driving at all. That is how and why he gets by with a fifty year old Corvette.
You of all people should know that buying just for show does not really help the environment. The next Presidential limo is likely to be electric.
This complaint of yours is without substance. Do you see that now?