Tumah
Veteran Member
That's the second one since 1865!Yet another movie theater shooting.
Those theaters are dangerous!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's the second one since 1865!Yet another movie theater shooting.
Are you being sarcastic or serious?That's the second one since 1865!
Those theaters are dangerous!
A little bit of this one and a little but of that one.Are you being sarcastic or serious?
There was one in Colorado just over three years ago.
Do you find the Wa Po balanced regarding Dems & Pubs?Not always or necessarily. In the case of the Washington Post, its positions and endorsements can be reviewed, and it will be revealed that they have indeed swung both ways, sometimes supporting republicans and conservatives, sometimes endorsing democrats and liberals.
Guns should be safely stored, but there are no guarantees in life.Let me tell two true stories. One about Roger and one about Donnie.
Both guys are middle aged countrified gun people from way back, like generations. They both got their first gun before they discovered girls. Totally licensed, everything, they both have collected guns their whole lives.
I spent an afternoon helping Roger move his gun safe into his new lake house. The guns were in a secure location somewhere else, but the safe alone weighed a few hundred pounds. It had to be in the basement, because that was the only place in the house with reinforced structural concrete. Roger did not consider anything else sufficient to bolt the guns to.
Donnie had a batch of guns, about 10. Three were high performance rifles, one he inherited from his grandpa. Those were hunting. Two or three were pricey pistols for target practice and personal security. The others were more modest weapons for teaching and squirrels and such. They were stored in a wooden rack he built and mounted to his bedroom wall himself, with a cable that ran through the trigger guards. Nobody but he and his wife were allowed in the bedroom without permission. The guns were safe from the kids.
But not the thieves who walked in to the house about a month ago. They took his wife's jewelry, the new TV, and the guns. Nothing else. They didn't bother with the safety cable on the guns, they crowbarred the whole thing off the wall. The cops estimated that they were in and out of the house in less than five minutes. A house that doesn't lock. The police and everyone surmised that the thieves knew the family well enough to know that the house had people in and out all the time, except for late Sunday morning when they all went to church. Which is when they came.
Donnie thinks he is the big victim here. Especially after he found out that his insurance doesn't cover guns without a rider he never popped for. I see him as a criminal who donated 10 guns to the illegal weapons market. But since we are related by marriage I don't say that out loud.
Tom
Guns should be safely stored, but there are no guarantees in life.
Yes.Do you think Donnie has a right to buy more guns?
Yes.Do you think it a violation of his constitutional rights to demand access to his home any time of the day or night by the government if he buys another gun?
No.Do you think he should be held accountable if any of those guns are used in a crime?
Tom
Why do you think so?Yes.
And I'd advise him to take greater care in their storage.
Because his initial measures failed.Why do you think so?
I advocate greater responsibility for secure storage of dangerous things such as guns.This was doubtless advised before and still he didn't. I don't know though.
Why does he have the right to be irresponsible with other people's safety?
Tom
Because his initial measures fai
What is reasonable about the precautions? It took the thieves less than 5 minutes to take a gun collection. I could have stolen them. Except I don't steal things.No.
His precautions were reasonable.
You expect reasonable precautions to be perfect?That is my point. His lifetime of experience did not protect you and me from gun related violence. He put a bunch of guns out there for the taking.
So why does his initial failure give him a right to buy high powered weapons?
Tom
It sounded like the thieves had inside info, & were prepared to steal the guns.What is reasonable about the precautions? It took the thieves less than 5 minutes to take a gun collection. I could have stolen them. Except I don't steal things.
Tom
That would never work and the suggestion alone scares me. The "war on drugs" fails for a reason, in part because it's designed to fail to feed the prison industrial complex, and also because it just wouldn't work anyway. Yes, they are bad, but that's why you get *accurate* information on the risks ect instead of all the silly propaganda often used that kids later learn isn't true then they underestimate the real risks.
You expect reasonable precautions to be perfect?
Using a safe is reasonable.No.
I'm saying that Donnie did not take reasonable precautions. By no stretch is leaving a batch of barely tied down weapons in an unlocked house reasonable precautions. And there are no consequences for this level of negligence. I think that is a huge part of the problem.
Tom
Exactly. Donnie liked his guns and liked showing them off. Everyone knows the thieves had already been in the room and knew that the guns weren't secure.It sounded like the thieves had inside info, & were prepared to steal the guns.
Yup. Well then, I guess that settles the gun control debate.
Sarcasm doesn't translate well over the internet, but I am being sarcastic, or at least attempting it. All this "how can we talk about about gun control when people are dieing in car accidents" talk is just the "starving kids in Africa" fallacy.