• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Yet another movie theater shooting.

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Not always or necessarily. In the case of the Washington Post, its positions and endorsements can be reviewed, and it will be revealed that they have indeed swung both ways, sometimes supporting republicans and conservatives, sometimes endorsing democrats and liberals.
Do you find the Wa Po balanced regarding Dems & Pubs?
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Let me tell two true stories. One about Roger and one about Donnie.
Both guys are middle aged countrified gun people from way back, like generations. They both got their first gun before they discovered girls. Totally licensed, everything, they both have collected guns their whole lives.
I spent an afternoon helping Roger move his gun safe into his new lake house. The guns were in a secure location somewhere else, but the safe alone weighed a few hundred pounds. It had to be in the basement, because that was the only place in the house with reinforced structural concrete. Roger did not consider anything else sufficient to bolt the guns to.
Donnie had a batch of guns, about 10. Three were high performance rifles, one he inherited from his grandpa. Those were hunting. Two or three were pricey pistols for target practice and personal security. The others were more modest weapons for teaching and squirrels and such. They were stored in a wooden rack he built and mounted to his bedroom wall himself, with a cable that ran through the trigger guards. Nobody but he and his wife were allowed in the bedroom without permission. The guns were safe from the kids.

But not the thieves who walked in to the house about a month ago. They took his wife's jewelry, the new TV, and the guns. Nothing else. They didn't bother with the safety cable on the guns, they crowbarred the whole thing off the wall. The cops estimated that they were in and out of the house in less than five minutes. A house that doesn't lock. The police and everyone surmised that the thieves knew the family well enough to know that the house had people in and out all the time, except for late Sunday morning when they all went to church. Which is when they came.

Donnie thinks he is the big victim here. Especially after he found out that his insurance doesn't cover guns without a rider he never popped for. I see him as a criminal who donated 10 guns to the illegal weapons market. But since we are related by marriage I don't say that out loud.
Tom
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Let me tell two true stories. One about Roger and one about Donnie.
Both guys are middle aged countrified gun people from way back, like generations. They both got their first gun before they discovered girls. Totally licensed, everything, they both have collected guns their whole lives.
I spent an afternoon helping Roger move his gun safe into his new lake house. The guns were in a secure location somewhere else, but the safe alone weighed a few hundred pounds. It had to be in the basement, because that was the only place in the house with reinforced structural concrete. Roger did not consider anything else sufficient to bolt the guns to.
Donnie had a batch of guns, about 10. Three were high performance rifles, one he inherited from his grandpa. Those were hunting. Two or three were pricey pistols for target practice and personal security. The others were more modest weapons for teaching and squirrels and such. They were stored in a wooden rack he built and mounted to his bedroom wall himself, with a cable that ran through the trigger guards. Nobody but he and his wife were allowed in the bedroom without permission. The guns were safe from the kids.

But not the thieves who walked in to the house about a month ago. They took his wife's jewelry, the new TV, and the guns. Nothing else. They didn't bother with the safety cable on the guns, they crowbarred the whole thing off the wall. The cops estimated that they were in and out of the house in less than five minutes. A house that doesn't lock. The police and everyone surmised that the thieves knew the family well enough to know that the house had people in and out all the time, except for late Sunday morning when they all went to church. Which is when they came.

Donnie thinks he is the big victim here. Especially after he found out that his insurance doesn't cover guns without a rider he never popped for. I see him as a criminal who donated 10 guns to the illegal weapons market. But since we are related by marriage I don't say that out loud.
Tom
Guns should be safely stored, but there are no guarantees in life.
What's the old saying.....
We make plans, & God laughs.
Good practice cannot ensure a perfect result, but it sure works better than inattention to risks.
 

Jewel789

New Member
It is messed up what this man did. Also, im not trying to be rude or downplay what this man did, but its kind of rude to say its yet another schizophrenic gone off the deep end. A lot of people struggle with mental illness, its very real
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Guns should be safely stored, but there are no guarantees in life.

Do you think Donnie has a right to buy more guns?
Do you think it a violation of his constitutional rights to demand access to his home any time of the day or night by the government if he buys another gun? Do you think he should be held accountable if any of those guns are used in a crime?
Tom
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Do you think Donnie has a right to buy more guns?
Yes.
And I'd advise him to take greater care in their storage.
Do you think it a violation of his constitutional rights to demand access to his home any time of the day or night by the government if he buys another gun?
Yes.
There's no need for surprise nitetime visits by government goons.
(Only "goons" would do such a thing at nite.)
Do you think he should be held accountable if any of those guns are used in a crime?
Tom
No.
His precautions were reasonable, & their use in a crime was not immediately foreseeable.
Moreover, guns a fungible, so anyone bent on crime would procure one somehow.
Universal high security storage standards could curb that problem though.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Why do you think so?
Because his initial measures failed.
This was doubtless advised before and still he didn't. I don't know though.
Why does he have the right to be irresponsible with other people's safety?
Tom
I advocate greater responsibility for secure storage of dangerous things such as guns.
And I cannot justify the current legal climate.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Because his initial measures fai

That is my point. His lifetime of experience did not protect you and me from gun related violence. He put a bunch of guns out there for the taking.
So why does his initial failure give him a right to buy high powered weapons?
Tom
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
That is my point. His lifetime of experience did not protect you and me from gun related violence. He put a bunch of guns out there for the taking.
So why does his initial failure give him a right to buy high powered weapons?
Tom
You expect reasonable precautions to be perfect?
You wouldn't argue that wearing a seatbelt is useless because one can die in a crash anyway.
Keeping guns in a safe is far far better than keeping them in a closet, which is common.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
What is reasonable about the precautions? It took the thieves less than 5 minutes to take a gun collection. I could have stolen them. Except I don't steal things.
Tom
It sounded like the thieves had inside info, & were prepared to steal the guns.
Reasonable storage security is no guarantee against a very dedicated & skilled crew.
Even cops & the military have weapons get stolen.
Good precautions reduce theft greatly.
 

Aquitaine

Well-Known Member
That would never work and the suggestion alone scares me. The "war on drugs" fails for a reason, in part because it's designed to fail to feed the prison industrial complex, and also because it just wouldn't work anyway. Yes, they are bad, but that's why you get *accurate* information on the risks ect instead of all the silly propaganda often used that kids later learn isn't true then they underestimate the real risks.

I know, I know. I'm generally against prohibition of drugs, I just meant it in a more joking fashion. ;)
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
You expect reasonable precautions to be perfect?

No.

I'm saying that Donnie did not take reasonable precautions. By no stretch is leaving a batch of barely tied down weapons in an unlocked house reasonable precautions. And there are no consequences for this level of negligence. I think that is a huge part of the problem.
Tom
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
No.

I'm saying that Donnie did not take reasonable precautions. By no stretch is leaving a batch of barely tied down weapons in an unlocked house reasonable precautions. And there are no consequences for this level of negligence. I think that is a huge part of the problem.
Tom
Using a safe is reasonable.
It's a much more effective barrier than a lock on a door.
As a landlord (doing locksmithing, not a burgling) I'd pick locks to get into units.
I've also drilled'm out, which is pretty easy if one knows where to drill.
But a safe.....they're harder to open, heavy, & awkward.
I move safes too (up to 12,000#), but this is far more difficult.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
It sounded like the thieves had inside info, & were prepared to steal the guns.
Exactly. Donnie liked his guns and liked showing them off. Everyone knows the thieves had already been in the room and knew that the guns weren't secure.

Roger has never had a gun stolen, and probably never will. Anyone who knows he has them also knows it would take dynamite or prying them out of his cold dead hands to get them.
Not impossible, but if gun owners were required to operate more like Roger there would be vastly less of a problem.
Tom
 

dust1n

Zindīq
Yup. Well then, I guess that settles the gun control debate.

Sarcasm doesn't translate well over the internet, but I am being sarcastic, or at least attempting it. All this "how can we talk about about gun control when people are dieing in car accidents" talk is just the "starving kids in Africa" fallacy.

Oh, in retrospect that should have been more obvious to me. Mind must be slippin'.
 
Top