• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Your opinion is solicited on the following piece of artwork

As art critic extrodinaire I find this work of art to be

  • Excellent. Simply excellent

    Votes: 2 3.1%
  • Inspirational

    Votes: 3 4.7%
  • Great

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Right on

    Votes: 1 1.6%
  • Ho Hum

    Votes: 6 9.4%
  • trite

    Votes: 8 12.5%
  • Schlock

    Votes: 16 25.0%
  • Abominable

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Excuse me, I have to go vomit

    Votes: 28 43.8%

  • Total voters
    64

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
It's subtle, I know, but the intended impression is that they are all looking at a cat. Nancy is even trying to communicate with it.

Then I must stand corrected! It's an extraordinary work in its genre: Powerful, moving, nuanced, and furry.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
mcnaughton.jpg

I voted Excellent.

If this was done by like, a Lithuanian dude from the 1950's, and his post-structural/magical realism-type style was totally making fun of American propaganda on the side of escaping Soviet persecution, and succeeded at ******* off my grandfather's generation, then this would be artistic gold.

So that's how I choose to see it. A mockery.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
What's with the dude counting money on the bottom right hand of the picture? Is that the master of ceremonies or team manager from an ecclesiastical public relations firm for managing such an event?
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
I voted Excellent.

If this was done by like, a Lithuanian dude from the 1950's, and his post-structural/magical realism-type style was totally making fun of American propaganda on the side of escaping Soviet persecution, and succeeded at ******* off my grandfather's generation, then this would be artistic gold.

So that's how I choose to see it. A mockery.

And yet, no cats.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
What's with the dude counting money on the bottom right hand of the picture? Is that the master of ceremonies or team manager from an ecclesiastical public relations firm for managing such an event?

You're on a roll today! I wish I had at least three more frubals for your posts in this and other threads. Drats, that I'm out!
 

CynthiaCypher

Well-Known Member
What's with the dude counting money on the bottom right hand of the picture? Is that the master of ceremonies or team manager from an ecclesiastical public relations firm for managing such an event?

Obviously that is the Jew. I just want to know why 4 out of the 6 black people in the pic are in the back.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Obviously that is the Jew. I just want to know why 4 out of the 6 black people in the pic are in the back.
I got a total of 5 black people

In front
1) college student
In back
2) American soldier
3) Union soldier
4) Fredrick Douglas
5) Harriet Tubman

which is 80% in back.

Of the white people, I got a total of 53


In front
total of 15
In back
total of 38
which is 72% in back

IMO 80% v. 72% is not a substantial difference

(There is one half-breed, (American Indian and white) Sequoyah))
 

CynthiaCypher

Well-Known Member
I got a total of 5 black people

In front
1) college student
In back
2) American soldier
3) Union soldier
4) Fredrick Douglas
5) Harriet Tubman

which is 80% in back.

Of the white people, I got a total of 53


In front
total of 15
In back
total of 38
which is 72% in back

IMO 80% v. 72% is not a substantial difference

(There is one half-breed, (American Indian and white) Sequoyah))

I think there is a black dude between Davey Crocketts and Ben Franklins head.
 

DreadFish

Cosmic Vagabond
As far as a painting, regardless of content, its not bad, but there's nothing really impressive about it.

As far as the content, its like :facepalm: over 9000. Most words just dont really match the kind of :facepalm: that I feel when I look at it. It's like a religious ideological derp. If it weren't painted well, it might as well be by a little kid who learned in Sunday school that our country is founded on God's law (and Jesus = God) and that everyone should acknowledge and follow that law.

Also, im with Sunstone, if it were a fat orange cat in the middle instead, it would be an instant classic.

If somebody does something like this to it, I will love them long time:

rexusa-1017882a-jpg_014003.jpg


rembrandt_nghtwatch-rijks-cat-w.jpg
 
Top