• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. P

    How do they know?

    :confused: How do they know the area is normally dry?
  2. P

    Georgia Grand Jury recommends perjury indictments.

    What cloaked terminology are you referring to in this case?
  3. P

    How do they know?

    Thank You. I am curious as to why you think it is unlikely for the birds to have directly seen or heard the rain given that 18 months or so of unusually high rainfall occurred (now that I've explained how the rain clouds could be directly visible to the birds). I would appreciate to know. Also...
  4. P

    Fox Knew They Were Peddling 2020 Election Lies

    I'm not a fan of Tucker Carlson, but I doubt that these claims by Dominion against Fox News will go very far in court... For example, On November 19, 2020, Tucker Carlson: Time for Sidney Powell to show us her evidence When you listen to only one side of an argument, as is the case with the...
  5. P

    How do they know?

    Obviously the solution to your problem requires more information. My first thought that I would like you to rule out is that the birds can simply see the rain and fly towards it. Migratory birds fly at thousands of feet in the air, which means they see the horizon at one or two hundred...
  6. P

    Georgia Grand Jury recommends perjury indictments.

    75 witnesses later... the grand jury believes perjury may have been committed by "one or more" of them... It sounds to me like the hunt to get Trump is petering out into more nothingburgers (as expected).
  7. P

    Why Didn't the Universe Always Exist?

    "Intelligent" must be adequately defined. Some say, "people are intelligent" and some say, "people are stupid". And it even seems that people can be both at the same time.
  8. P

    Who knows?

    I've given some good reasons for you to consider. Not sure what "facts" you are referring to. Feel free to look up Evidence of Absence and Absence of Evidence if you are still confused. And now you can add False Dichotomy to your fallacies as the presence of prayers is not the absence of...
  9. P

    Why Didn't the Universe Always Exist?

    The size of the Earth is irrelevant to the theological question. I could've chosen any planet, any star, any blackhole, or even any universe. Why didn't the Earth always exist? If the Force that created the Earth is outside of Earth time and *always* existed, how could this Force have waited...
  10. P

    Who knows?

    The absence argument is a well-known logical fallacy. Even if you think prayer merely has a placebo effect, it means that you believe that prayer has a helpful effect. To believe that prayer has a placebo effect and also that prayer does not help is contradictory. You're arguing about the...
  11. P

    Why Didn't the Universe Always Exist?

    Why didn't the planet Earth always exist? Since the forces that created the Earth are outside of the Earth, how could the forces that created the Earth use a point in time to start the Earth? Earth days did not exist prior to the creation of the Earth.
  12. P

    Who knows?

    Here are some reasons to believe in God: the lack of falsifiable evidence (by definition the lack of a capacity to prove God does not exist) the effect of prayer (which improves the overall well-being of its practitioners) the reality of suffering (which validates the existence of paths which...
  13. P

    The guy who hit Paul Pelosi with a hammer has something to say.

    Without knowing what his message is, how would I judge if it is appropriate?
  14. P

    If Not Science...

    o_O What do you consider to be a "real answer" to your thread question or are you saying that answering your thread question is a "waste of time"? :confused:
  15. P

    Morality: Do you agree

    Do you mean to say that the argument is not just that people have subjective opinions, but that people are incapable of having objective opinions (with regards to morality)?
  16. P

    Objective Morality Without God

    Hmm. The problem with your argument is that you didn't explain why stealing is, objectively, wrong. You explained why you "personally" think stealing is wrong. As far as I can tell, this is essential to your argument because you say, "if THOSE REASONS explain why stealing is wrong, then..."
  17. P

    If Not Science...

    The scientific method doesn't provide a means to answer your question at all, does it? How would you use science to answer your question?
  18. P

    J6 Committee unanimous

    Encourgaging someone to commit a crime is literally the definition of incitement. Then it should have been no trouble for him to amend his claim. Because it was the purported intent of the committee to investigate the events of Jan 6 at the capitol. You claimed it was incitement before...
  19. P

    Objective Morality Without God

    Your morality is subjective. It is according to "your view".
  20. P

    Morality: Do you agree

    1. Without God there is no moral foundation. and 2. People are capable of moral judgment. are not mutually exclusive. Perhaps this is a false dichotomy?
Top