• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. P

    What would an improved society look like?

    The definition of anarchy I gave is from Oxford Languages (google); it is a common definition. "no rulers" not "no rules" suggests to me that you have a Utopian view of anarchy where people follow the "rules" in the absence of "rulers". However, you then propose that the free market could be a...
  2. P

    Evil in the world and God

    Saying people obey their own will is a nothing statement. Oh no! I do what I will!
  3. P

    What would an improved society look like?

    Collective by definition is done by people acting as a group. Anarchy by definition is a state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority or other controlling systems. Collective anarchy is fundamentally self-contradictory as collectivism requires a societal pact between...
  4. P

    Problem?

    It means that scientists are not omniscient.
  5. P

    Christianity

    Only 2 billion? Yikes! That leaves more than 5 billion people who don't believe in resurrection.
  6. P

    Evil in the world and God

    I am not a robot :whitecheck:
  7. P

    This Is What You Get From Those Without Experience Or Thinking The Issue Through

    Golf carts are better used to help people make their way across the links or in bumper car amusement park rides. IMO.
  8. P

    Facts vs evidence

    Eye witness testimony is just one form of (non-scientific) evidence used in cases and science need not be excluded. I gave problems with an only science approach to trial and debate. If one places "too much" emphasis on science then by definition one has made a mistake and should've placed...
  9. P

    Facts vs evidence

    Definition of... what? Perhaps you should clarify the thing being defined and give your own definition of that thing. Also, while you now say your claim was from a "pure logic perspective", it was actually from the perspective of what you (or other "scientists" you've known) have or have not...
  10. P

    Facts vs evidence

    It is estimated that approximately 5% of people incarcerated in US prisons are actually innocent. If only they had those scientific results during trial. The problem here is that either science hadn't advanced enough yet or evidence wasn't gathered for the trial. The problem is not that...
  11. P

    Facts vs evidence

    Judging the arguments is something observers of the debate do. If someone "reliable" claims to have seen a shapeshifting cat, observers of the testimony will draw their own conclusions. They may doubt the person's reliability, or not, on the basis of their entire testimony. The same goes for...
  12. P

    Facts vs evidence

    Evidence such as testimony is evaluated by its source = a method that works for courtrooms and for debates. Science evaluates hypotheses via experimentation, which is why it is not well-suited to a courtroom or to a debate. Placing too much emphasis on science to resolve every question leads to...
  13. P

    Happy Easter!

    Happy Easter!
  14. P

    January 6th, Just What Was It?

    I already explained the difference. You should pay better attention. The exculpatory nature has already been explained. Go back and read. If it's about the Obstruction charge, then you should be aware that Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building is a different charge. It doesn't...
  15. P

    Israel's Cabinet Just Advanced Full-fledged Apartheid in the West Bank

    Hmm. Russia wants to annex Ukraine. China wants to annex Taiwan. Israel wants to annex Gaza and the West Bank. Yes?
  16. P

    Greece in Europe?

    Indeed, India sits upon its own tectonic plate.
  17. P

    January 6th, Just What Was It?

    I don't know that we have a significant disagreement here except to say that it's is possible that Chansley case will not be reconsidered because of the waiver of Appeal. Not as empty as your assertion that the footage was provided to the defense. Because inculpatory footage was available the...
  18. P

    They Lied Repeatedly and Intentionally

    52:14 of video with an expert lawyer in which not one example of the alleged activity was given! Are you serious? What a waste of time for me to have watched that video! They talked on and on about how serious the alleged activity was and didn't give even one example of it! Disgusting. You...
  19. P

    Visit NSW

    The confusopoly of their voting system seems like a valid point - a system designed to prevent voters from making informed decisions. What could possibly go wrong?
  20. P

    Evolution not God

    Wait... Hold On... Let's think about this for a moment... Do I understand you correctly? If a group of people decide to genocide another portion of the human population - an event that has taken place at various times in human history, then humanity's standard of morality is that those...
Top