Assuming that acceptance of the “invitation“ is optional, assuming that you are not dragged through the streets in chains nor are you questioned while being suspended over a vat of boiling oil, why is it outrageous?
@Sargonski
”Rose”? “Sister Rose”?
Given that @rosends is not a woman, and neither his first nor last name is Rose, you might want to rethink how you address him.
It was neither empathetic nor unempathetic. It was an inquiry based upon the OP’s history of posts during his years on the forum. I certainly was not disparaging him for being bisexual nor was I commenting on bisexuality per se.
To the extent that any of us, on a forum, can be of any...
https://unitarianbahai.angelfire.com/
https://unitarianbahais.org/
There are actually two websites I ran across. I don't think that they are connected. I just thought they might prove useful to you.
You seem to have become fixated on this section of scripture. I may be duplicating a question I asked you on another thread, but allow me to perhaps rephrase it. What do you think happened in the scripture you cite?
@Starlight
While on one level it could be said that Muslims, Christians, Baha’is and Jews believe in the same G-d, hence the term that I’m not particularly fond of - Abrahamic religions, on another level it could be argued that certain variances between beliefs and understandings held by the...
Actually, it is not, although labelling it an 18th century forgery, as did @nPeace , would not be exactly accurate either. The earliest known version of this is a printing in 1625 CE which means that if one considers this a forgery it would be a 17th century forgery. The actual date of...