I'm not familiar with a Jehovah-Brahman hybrid, so I can't help you sorry. Maybe someone else can :)
As I said, I'm more familiar with the idea of taking the Lord's name in vain in a Christian context.
Since Brahman is the all-pervading reality (I believe .. happy to be corrected) then I don't...
I'm afraid I don't understand the question with relation to Brahman. Can you please rephrase?
To "take the Lord's name in vain" I believe means to swear an oath to Jehova, or invoke Jehova, inappropriately.
Could it also be the problem that when we name something we firmly establish it's "otherness" in relation to our ego-selves, which is counterproductive to Oneness?
I've had the chance to watch the video this evening and, acknowledging this is not a debate forum, I'll just say I find it to be heavily biased and leave it at that.
In fact, you find within the Sikh scripture hymns by Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims (Sufis) :) And the first Sikh Guru, Guru Nanak Sahib travelled the land with his best friend and Muslim Mardana. Guru Nanak would sing and Bhai Mardana would play the rabab.
They didn't fade into obscurity, the people were converted to Christianity as part of a process of political domination, and nothing much of the religions of the peoples of Northern Europe was written down, and so it was lost. See this fellow for more information Charlemagne - Wikipedia...
Thanks everyone for your replies.
@SalixIncendium it's a great feeling to connect with other people in the same situation. I hope I can get to that same point of withdrawing inward and being content there. Do you also abstain from engaging with online communities of Advaita Vedanta folk...
I'm tired of this spiritual drift. A blog I had seven years ago still describes me today. Much has happened, but nothing much has changed. Stuck in between the beliefs I keep returning to, and the cultural disconnect the religion associated with those beliefs creates in me.
No other holy...
Edit: Sorry, I misread your OP. Have adjusted the below accordingly.
What's wrong with just "Mother Nature"? Mother Nature is practically a modern "deity" in her own right. Why does it have to be more complicated than that?
Have you asked your daughter to tell you more about Mother Nature...
Hello Ajay
In my understanding Sikhi is panentheistic, not monotheistic.
Monotheism puts God and creation separate. Panentheism has creation made of God and God extending beyond the creation. (refer my earlier post re. water and the wave)
Are you sure monotheism describes Sikhi? :)
But you know, in the shower I much prefer bar soap. I feel that people judge me for that.
My sister always looks at me skew-whiff and goes, "But it leads to a build up of soap scum and makes the shower harder to clean". My partner and most other people I encounter say using bar soap in the...
Well, this is complicated.
I would choose the liquid soap unless it's my own bathroom.
To me, a person's choice between the bar and liquid soap doesn't say anything conclusive about them. You'd need to have a discussion about it. But some thoughts if they chose the bar:
They may be more...
Thanks for expanding on your point. While I do not agree with your interpretation of Sikh literature and the idea of all gods being paths to God, that's okay. The world is big enough for both of us.
Even the Stoics, who were all about God's Will and delineating between what is and is not without our control, included requests in their prayers.
On one hand there is the reminder that everything that happens is by God's will, and the other hand is the natural urge to request that our basic...