No, because of a couple of reasons. First, fetuses have no chance to survive outside the womb under 22 weeks pregnancy. Fetal viability - Wikipedia So, it really makes no difference how you remove it. Second, it's incredibly difficult to remove it in the first place, so it requires resources and...
Yes. So what you've been doing is using the bible to prove god exists. The Bible already assumes the existence of god and there is no verification or falsification outside the Bible. This is akin to reading any book and believing whatever is inside is true. So, it may be better to show the...
Descartes removed everything. It's not enough to just say it must be subconscious and therefore it is separate from me. Remember, the unconscious is a relatively new concept, which was primarily thought of by Freud. In the past, actions or thoughts outside of ones behaviour might be thought of...
Ok cool. Lots of arts degrees. The link you gave is not worthy of being read. Wiki has more references and are more varying. Thanks
Learn the difference between a personal website and a published article. If you want, you can even give wiki.
lol, as far as I'm aware, geology is not an arts degree.
Now that you've changed it from Psychology, to Counselling Psychology, even though I asked you specifically if there was more, it appears it's not an arts degree either.
:confused:
A bit vague but true.
Control is a can of worms. One could argue I control nothing for materialistic or deterministic reasons and the abstract concept of control implies one is already in control. Circular reasoning?
I don't know how you can cause something to exist.
In this hypothetical, I...
Here's some interesting science for you: Stanley Milgram performed a study on authority figures and obedience. He found a large portion of participants would kill someone else because they were ordered to and responsibility was placed on someone else. Good ol science at work.
I don't disagree, but why would we need the distinction unscientific if the claim in question does not claim to be science? I suppose it could be used a sledgehammer to say it's probably nonsense lol. Though I've heard more of a phrase used, like, "It's not supported by science," or somesuch.
No, I don't know anything about Mantra. If I got this right, I am curious how raising your mantra helps your identify(?) unscientific sources? I dunno.
How does one demonstrate a thing in itself exists and I don't know how someone can explain the unknown? You can only really ostensibly explain the unknown by comparing it to the known.
Yeah lol
Yep, you do ;)
Ok... Most scientific papers are written by numerous doctors and specialists in the field. This website is not one of those and it appears to be more like her blog. The thing you've linked is not published, or been through the scientific peer review process and the two...