• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. charlie sc

    Why do atheist believe something can come from nothing?

    Not necessarily. Many Buddhists consider themselves spiritual and atheists. However, lack of belief in god is correct. I’m not sure why you’d be an atheist because of what people said to you :confused:. Atheism and scepticism is an intellectual process
  2. charlie sc

    Why do atheist believe something can come from nothing?

    Generally, this is not the atheist worldview. Is this what you thought, as an atheist?
  3. charlie sc

    Would you force someone to do something to save someone else?

    Good, you're pro-choice. I'm glad you're displaying some rationality. It's only irrational if it's no and then yes to the questions. This is definitely not tunnel vision. It does. If we could keep a fetus alive without the mother, we would. However, this is not the case. Since the mother is in...
  4. charlie sc

    Why do atheist believe something can come from nothing?

    How?
  5. charlie sc

    We Can't Fix the World, So Now What?

    Talk about moving the goalpost...
  6. charlie sc

    We Can't Fix the World, So Now What?

    I hope you’re ok, my friend.
  7. charlie sc

    We Can't Fix the World, So Now What?

    You’re not answering to me. You’re answering to yourself. Your inability to answer me has made me important to you, in some way. There’s nothing to be ashamed of in honesty.
  8. charlie sc

    We Can't Fix the World, So Now What?

    Interesting. Yet, you cannot answer one simple question when confronted about yourself. Know thyself indeed.
  9. charlie sc

    Children and Religion

    Not entirely true. Quite a large portion of personality, as measured by the five factor model, is hereditary.
  10. charlie sc

    Would you force someone to do something to save someone else?

    This law appears to be used for the protection of the people trying to help. Not to enforce someone to do something. This law appears to be about protecting or at least consideing others when you did something that's potentially harmfully. This is more about not hurting others. This law...
  11. charlie sc

    Would you force someone to do something to save someone else?

    Possibly. However, this particular example, you gave, is not used to directly save another life. Understandably, laws exist, normally, to better society and therefore improve/save lives, but it's not used to directly save someone. Perhaps you can think of another and better example to prove you...
  12. charlie sc

    Would you force someone to do something to save someone else?

    Then, in what circumstances is it enforcable? What? It's a simple logical contradiction, which is unavoidable if one answered yes to both. Ok I'll add more. Done.
  13. charlie sc

    Would you force someone to do something to save someone else?

    They believe they're doing what?
  14. charlie sc

    Would you force someone to do something to save someone else?

    If you answered no to this question, here is another question: are you pro-life? If it's yes to this question, how do you reconcile your irrationality? Side note: this is about abortion ;) Pro-life vs pro-choice *edited
  15. charlie sc

    Science cannot solve the final mystery

    Yes. I see him as either a very humorous POE or Either way, I find him quite funny.
  16. charlie sc

    Science cannot solve the final mystery

    I'm using the most common use of the word and if I deviate I may use an uncommon usage. However, I always try stay within standardised definitions. You, on the other hand, seem to define things so far out of context it becomes insane. You're using the word worship as the word see. Why not just...
  17. charlie sc

    Science cannot solve the final mystery

    Why should anyone accommodate your insane definitions? Your definitions become meaningless for any practical and comprehensive use. This is like glimpsing into the abyss of madness.
  18. charlie sc

    The studies on Muslims, so far, have shown that religiosity is associated with criminality

    You make it sound as if true Muslims are perfect.
  19. charlie sc

    Science cannot solve the final mystery

    Oh, so now it's a glance. Isn't it still worship? Ummm, yes they do. Idolatry - Wikipedia So we're talking about faith now, not worship? :confused:
  20. charlie sc

    Science cannot solve the final mystery

    You understand that, according to your logic and usage of words, theists are going against their god because they’re worshiping everything else and false idols.
Top