Because "Lucifer" is mentioned only once and in only one translation of the Bible, two if you count the new version. The King James and New King James Version. The term, "Haylel" is generally translated "Day Star" or "Morning Star". In both, "Lucifer" is a title, and applied to a human king.
"Lucifer" has never been His name, unless you are referring to a minor Greco Roman deity, which you are not.
In fact, "Lucifer", in the King James version of the Bible refers to a human king, not a fallen malach. While I am still uncertain if Isaiah is referencing a spirit behind the King or...
Etu, I agree that Luciferianism does not need to be twisted into another "Satanism". Let me see... We have Theistic, Traditional, Philosophical, Anticosmic, Atheistic, Spiritual and that strange version where people paint "666" all over, sacrifice black cats, and that strange "other" category...
I view such votes as nonsense because I believe, for a voting system to work, one must actually participate in the voting itself. A vote of no confidence just shows one desires an option that is not on the ballot. Nonsense votes like "Mickey Mouse", "Jesus Christ" or "my neighbors dog" serve...
Okay, Etu. I agree with you that this directory has yet to fully define what the Western LHP is and is not.
My issue with you, as you already know, is your overwhelmingly oppressive desire to relabel Luciferianism to only your world view. Then, you also said the LHP is only about self...
Insulting people with views you disagree with, rather than debating the issues with the view itself, is not going to prove anything more than your incapability to engage in a mature discussion. Would you care to try again? This time without the need for insults?
Just digitize the whole process and make it mandatory to participate. Digitization would also make it possible to exclude the possibility of "none of the above" or nonsense type ballots.
It causes me frustration to observe behavior like yours, yes. However, in regard to fundamentalism, I refer to the attitude some radical Christians have where anyone who does not agree with their world view will "burn in Hell" if they do not repent. You are similar in that you proclaim absolute...
It bothers me because you have this habit of speaking as if you are an absolute authority on what is or is not LHP, or who is or is not able to use a certain religious label, like myself.
Now, if you desire to debate what is and is not LHP without resorting to the type of arrogance you have, I...
No, I do not believe in what goes around comes around, much less any variety of earthly karma. One can gain as much in life from doing evil as they can from good. What happens after mortality expires? That is up for debate.
Self deification, in my opinion, is ridiculous. The closest I believe one can come is to fully realize their deity's nature within themselves. In other words, to become the ideal embodiment, not generally of their deity directly but their deity's nature, will and so on. I do not believe humans...
Through my discussions with many Christians and even Theistic Satanists and Luciferians, I have noticed a trend. In most cases, each perceives their deity as equivalent to a card board cutout or a terribly designed role play game character. Yah is defined as this all loving and protective...