• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. David M

    Why evolution did not comes like this ?

    That is not the calculation that you were told was not possible. That is a calculation based on data from existing humans and the existing genetic differences between us. The calculation you were told is impossible is on that predicts what specific mutations will take place in the future. For...
  2. David M

    Why evolution did not comes like this ?

    Eyes came well before mammals. The first mammals had eyes, just not the exact same eyes that humans have (current mammal species don't have exactly identical eyes).
  3. David M

    Why evolution did not comes like this ?

    It makes no such predictions and no such maths exists. Once again you demonstrate your complete ignorance on a subject, this time its maths. There is a huge difference in the maths involved in calculating probabilities based on things that already exist and probabilities based on future...
  4. David M

    Why evolution did not comes like this ?

    Technically speaking Birds are Dinosaurs because their ancestors were Dinosaurs.
  5. David M

    Saudi cleric says earth doesn't rotate

    As gnostic has pointed out, it says no such thing.
  6. David M

    Evolution theory turns colleges into hellholes of depression

    Once again you repeat your mistakes of equivocation and, as usual, ignore the parts of a post that demolish your arguments. You cannot get past the simple truth that the existence of a thing is separate from the human experience of that thing and that human experience is subjective. Your...
  7. David M

    Saudi cleric says earth doesn't rotate

    No its doesn't. It says that day, night, sun and moon (and other celestial bodies) are not stationary. You are adding the earth into that list because you want to claim that Quran is heliocentric rather than geocentric.
  8. David M

    Evolution theory turns colleges into hellholes of depression

    No, the existence of anger is a matter of fact (under the definition of anger that humanity has agreed upon). It is an objective fact that Anger exists as an emotional state. Your persistent failure to understand that the fact that something exists does not automatically equate to the...
  9. David M

    The movement of the earth in Qur'an

    So what? That passage is no more than a poetically phrased description of observable reality that (unsurprisingly) attributes said reality to a creator. It certainly says nothing about the movement of the earth that can't be seen by looking at the sky. You means by a lot less and a fair...
  10. David M

    Genetic 'Adam & Eve' Chromosome Study Traces All Men To Man Who Lived 135,000 Years Ago

    And yet the evidence says otherwise. Modern humans evolved in one area of the world and spread out from there. The most probable way that this occurred was that there were waves of such migrations but they were ultimately unsuccessful other than the last one that happened somewhere around 60,000...
  11. David M

    Evolution theory turns colleges into hellholes of depression

    You have provided no evidence, not even when requested to do so. You refuse to provide understandable defintions of the terms you use, even when requested to do so. You re not engaging in "common discourse" at all, because it involves both parties actually explaining their position in a manner...
  12. David M

    Evolution theory turns colleges into hellholes of depression

    And as everyone's opinions are equally subjectively valid according to the OP then the OP isn't correct about anything, he's choosing to think one thing while the rest of us are choosing to think he's wrong. Its all just his opinion.
  13. David M

    Evolution theory turns colleges into hellholes of depression

    I'm sorry, but do you really think that neurologists, evolutionary psychologists, Darwinian philosophers or evolutionary scientists spend their time updating a Wiki entry on Free Will? Wiki is not an authoritative and definitive source on any science related subject, its a starting point for...
  14. David M

    Evolution theory turns colleges into hellholes of depression

    Obviously incorrect as multiple people have trouble deciphering your ramblings.
  15. David M

    Evolution theory turns colleges into hellholes of depression

    If anything, depression is exacerbated by the destruction of objectivity and a rise in subjectivity (by your usage of the terms). This fact is not obvious, in fact its flat out incorrect. Facts are facts, that you refuse to accept them is your problem, not reality's.
  16. David M

    How to deal with people who deny free will?

    No, none of these people deny that free will exists at all. What has become abundantly clear is that a subset of things we previously thought resulted from free will are in fact not truly governed by free will. And no, its also nothing to do with evolution theory, its neuroscience that has...
  17. David M

    Split-colour bird is half male, half female

    I've always wondered how the multitude of species that reproduce asexually, having no males or females, or are hermaphrodites fit into this model. Perhaps you could enlighten us?
  18. David M

    How Creationism Hurts Chrsitian Colleges—And Their Students

    They are chemistry in the brain, doesn't mean that they aren't real though.
  19. David M

    The assumptions behind evolution?

    Irrelevant. There are many Christian scientists who can explain evolution. Sanford is not unable to explain evolution, he denies it because it conflicts with his interpretation of scripture. In which case why can it be trusted when it comes to humans? This makes no sense whatsoever. Whether...
  20. David M

    The assumptions behind evolution?

    Sanford is a professional creationist and his computer model is completely worthless. A model can only be considered relevant IF its results conform to reality for known real-world parameters, if it cannot reflect reality it cannot predict anything in a valid way. If you apply it to any...
Top