No, you can't. What you see is due to differing indices of refrsction in portions of air rising by convection.
Energy is neither a thing nor a substance. It is just shorthand for expressing states of objects.
As far as I can tell, these days the notion of a soul is just a ruse used by rascally clergy to fool the gullible. Originally I suppose it was a garden-variety category error, like asking where fire goes when fuel runs out.
Why "incredibly complex"? I don't think that anyone claims that the first evolving entities were full-blown cells. Self replicating molecules are more likely.
I had in mind the professional promoters of creationism who I regard as con men. I think it would be inane to respect them. However, I find it harder to decide how to regard their victims.
What do you do when what is in the bible is different from what is found in the real world?
For example, it is entirely clear that Noah's flood never happened. How do you handle that?
You are ignoring the non-random operation of selection, which provides a powerful ratcheting effect.
Just the usual dishonest creationist ploy. Ho-hum.
The elements etc form according to the properties of the universe. Your ignorance is no excuse for turning to made-up stuff. Why not obtain an education, instead?
At present, it is not possible to probe the very earliest moments of the big bang. That may remain forever impossible. That, too, is...
I believe those scientific mechanisms exist with the help of a creating intelligent designer with a plan.
I'm not able to believe pond scum eventually came forth from a big bang, and the energy to create that bang came out of nowhere and nothing, so that all these scientific mechanisms take...
You are presuming that there is a god.
My considered opinion is that religion is entirely a scam designed to provide power and livelihoods to clerics. The reason it is so widespread is that it has been refined over millennia.