• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A Bunch of Reasons Why I Question Noah's Flood Story:

robocop (actually)

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
No. Instead, he's ensuring that the claims in the bible can't rationally be believed, by cleaning up and hiding the evidence left behind. In fact........ not only is he covering up his actions..... he's rearranging everything to make it look like it NEVER occurred and in some cases, actually plants evidence that something entirely different occurred instead.

When someone goes out of their way to make sure there is no evidence left of one's actions, and even plants new evidence to specifically mislead observers, then that is deception. There is no way around that.
When people can believe some things can be done by God, they are not being lied to if they think something wasn't done by God. They simply didn't consider it.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Not at all. He doesn't punish people for not believing in the flood but the story teaches morality.
It doesn't work because God never endowed humans with the discipline adequate to obey the rules God set forth. We see this in the A&E story. It's like parents punishing infants before they have any understanding of language or rules.

Essentially the morality of these stories is: citizens follow the rules of the middlemen for God (the leadership) or God (rather, God's middlemen) will punish you in ways that could be deadly. So obey the rules, or else.

How else could you keep order with rather unsophisticated, primitive people?

How do these morality tales work in a modern society?
 

robocop (actually)

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Appreciate his morals? This God we're talking about endorsed slavery and genocide. I don't find those things to be particularly moral. My morals are better than that God's morals.
If you keep the commandments and try to understand God instead of judging, I think you will be better off.
Slaves were supposed to be treated well.
Genocide because humanity was destroying itself anyway.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
If you keep the commandments and try to understand God instead of judging, I think you will be better off.
Slaves were supposed to be treated well.
So it's moral to own people?

Genocide because humanity was destroying itself anyway.
Just as God created. Or did god play dice with its creation and had no idea what would happen?

Are you saying that God was surprised by how human society evolved as it created them?
 

robocop (actually)

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
It doesn't work because God never endowed humans with the discipline adequate to obey the rules God set forth. We see this in the A&E story. It's like parents punishing infants before they have any understanding of language or rules.

Essentially the morality of these stories is: citizens follow the rules of the middlemen for God (the leadership) or God (rather, God's middlemen) will punish you in ways that could be deadly. So obey the rules, or else.

How else could you keep order with rather unsophisticated, primitive people?

How do these morality tales work in a modern society?
That's a big lie. Jesus set the example of not sinning. We all sin so repentance helps us make it back to our Heavenly Father through Christ's atonement.
 

robocop (actually)

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
So it's moral to own people?


Just as God created. Or did god play dice with its creation and had no idea what would happen?

Are you saying that God was surprised by how human society evolved as it created them?
God doesn't give people 2021 values in 600 b.c. or they can't handle them.

Imo God knows what will happen but we still choose. Actually I differ from my church. I don't think any being chooses anything.

In the case of Noah's Ark, humanity was self-destructive already.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
God doesn't give people 2021 values in 600 b.c. or they can't handle them.
So we don't need 600 BCE morals anymore, wouldn't you say? The Leviticus and Exodus laws? Do we need those?

Imo God knows what will happen but we still choose. Actually I differ from my church. I don't think any being chooses anything.
Great, so a God creating people knows what those humans will do as it created them, thus the people THINK they are making decisions but God already knows what they will decide, and lets that creation happen. God is accountable for all things in history.

In the case of Noah's Ark, humanity was self-destructive already.
Just as God created. Or is God incompetent and doesn't know what it's doing?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
For instance my church does a great amount of humanitarian aid.
As a church should do.

When I was in high school I worked in my grandmother's church "soup kitchen". Wow, talk about an eye opener to a kid growing up the affluent suburbs. As an atheist I could recognize that if a group says they are moral they place an obligation on themselves to live up to it. So you have an atheist working at a church to help the needy. Does that mean an endorsement to what the church claims as religious belief? No. There are bad believers and good atheists. Good people make good believers, bad people make bad theists, but religion doesn't make bad people good.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
That's a big lie. Jesus set the example of not sinning. We all sin so repentance helps us make it back to our Heavenly Father through Christ's atonement.
So if you all sin, then what point was Jesus' example to not sin? I mean didn't you all know this already? You have hundreds of laws in the books already, what more do you need?

jesus was just another patch to fix a glitch in creation. And it fixed nothing.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
You don't give people 2021 morals in 600 bc.
So morals change? Why?

Doesn't;t that open the door to any human insisting they have the newest version of morality? Look at suicide bombers exploiting this loophole. Can you say they are wrong? Maybe they are doing God's will and you are living with obsolete morals, possible?
 

robocop (actually)

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
We gain moral strength by living vicariously through Jesus Christ.

The whole plan of salvation is very consistent in my experience with people fighting my religion on the Internet.
 
Top