SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
That's the line I called a convenient cop out.Miracles occur among believers.
Because that's all it is.
You have to already believe to believe. How much more circular can you get?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's the line I called a convenient cop out.Miracles occur among believers.
Except when they were told to own each other as property. Or to dash babies' heads against rocks and capture virgins to keep for themselves. I bet those babies and virgins were really feelin' that love.People were always commanded to love each other.
The ten commandments forbid the kind of Biblical immorality that has been described. The Jews do not practice the kind of immorality that has been described. The New Testament also has cancelled that immorality.I'm not concerned about my own morality. I have a moral compass.
I'm concerned about people who espouse Biblical morality because they believe it comes from some God.
We're talking about God's supposed morality here. The morality you say you, and everyone should follow. Or should I say, immorality.
There are things that can help you to believe.That's the line I called a convenient cop out.
Because that's all it is.
You have to already believe to believe. How much more circular can you get?
Yeah, those were pretty bad things. Let me look those things up.Except when they were told to own each other as property. Or to dash babies' heads against rocks and capture virgins to keep for themselves. I bet those babies and virgins were really feelin' that love.
OK heads against rocks: I did some googling:Except when they were told to own each other as property. Or to dash babies' heads against rocks and capture virgins to keep for themselves. I bet those babies and virgins were really feelin' that love.
OK slavery:Except when they were told to own each other as property. Or to dash babies' heads against rocks and capture virgins to keep for themselves. I bet those babies and virgins were really feelin' that love.
OK virgins.Except when they were told to own each other as property. Or to dash babies' heads against rocks and capture virgins to keep for themselves. I bet those babies and virgins were really feelin' that love.
In Numbers 31 it does not say they slept with the virgins. Don't blast out at me if I'm wrong, but I think they kept the virgins and children as an act of morality since those people were not guilty like the rest of the people they were fighting.
Again, you have a blind spot when it comes to understanding your own scripture. The God and his followers in the OT certainly do practice that kind of "morality" - the worst kind.The ten commandments forbid the kind of Biblical immorality that has been described. The Jews do not practice the kind of immorality that has been described. The New Testament also has cancelled that immorality.
I am more concerned about my own morality than God's. This isn't enough to make me toss the whole Bible.Just to show how easily your apologetics can be refuted; They didn't keep the virgins and children for moral purposes.
Perhaps you really are that naive and gullible. Perhaps you just have a big blind spot when it comes to reading scripture.
Numbers 31
17Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man intimately. 18But keep alive for yourselves all the young girls who have not known a man intimately.
Since you had to look up all these instances of evil, I'll venture that the "controversial" Biblical passages are not discussed in your Bible studies. You need to ask your elders why.
Again, you have a blind spot when it comes to understanding your own scripture. The God and his followers in the OT certainly do practice that kind of "morality" - the worst kind.
But, hey, it's all good right? The NT cancels all the bad ****. Yipee.
OK, so I got off the phone with my parents.Just to show how easily your apologetics can be refuted; They didn't keep the virgins and children for moral purposes.
Perhaps you really are that naive and gullible. Perhaps you just have a big blind spot when it comes to reading scripture.
Numbers 31
17Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man intimately. 18But keep alive for yourselves all the young girls who have not known a man intimately.
Since you had to look up all these instances of evil, I'll venture that the "controversial" Biblical passages are not discussed in your Bible studies. You need to ask your elders why.
Again, you have a blind spot when it comes to understanding your own scripture. The God and his followers in the OT certainly do practice that kind of "morality" - the worst kind.
But, hey, it's all good right? The NT cancels all the bad ****. Yipee.
I don't think it's a lie to offer a counter view to religious dogma when that dogma isn't known to be factual or true itself.That's a big lie. Jesus set the example of not sinning. We all sin so repentance helps us make it back to our Heavenly Father through Christ's atonement.
So why do you need a Bible at all?I am more concerned about my own morality than God's. This isn't enough to make me toss the whole Bible.
You can't figure out things without guidance from others, who sin themselves according to you? What makes them worth following?God gives us prophets so we know what we need to focus on in our time and situation. If we hold to them we are more guided. Our head prophet, besides Jesus Christ, is Russel M. Nelson.
Well if the USA can survive 2021 Republican values we might get there. The values we need now is good environmental stewardship. These values are not shared by a large minority, most of them fervent Christians, which is a problem.By the way I should ask, why don't we live by 2200 year values?
We don't comprehend them and we're not ready for them.
You can offer a counter view and that's just fine. Was Balaam sinning when he thought the donkey was talking to him? Of course not. It's not a sin to think there was no flood.I don't think it's a lie to offer a counter view to religious dogma when that dogma isn't known to be factual or true itself.
I recall Jesus knocking over the tables of the money changers, and that sort of public disruption isn't a sin?
Why do you need Windows 1-9 to build Windows 10? Because in life if we follow our parents and tradition it is an anchor. If we discard them we are on our own. Even our genes come from billions of years of evolution. Would you discard your genes just like that?So why do you need a Bible at all?
They are called of God. What made Moses worth following? He killed someone.You can't figure out things without guidance from others, who sin themselves according to you? What makes them worth following?
I am sorry I have always been the greenest person in my family.Well if the USA can survive 2021 Republican values we might get there. The values we need now is good environmental stewardship. These values are not shared by a large minority, most of them fervent Christians, which is a problem.
Which Ten Commandments? Most Christians do not know that there is only one set in the whole Bible that is labeled as "The Ten Commandments". The words in titles to chapters were not original. Those were added later.The ten commandments forbid the kind of Biblical immorality that has been described. The Jews do not practice the kind of immorality that has been described. The New Testament also has cancelled that immorality.
"Why callest thou me good? (why do you use your own defintion of good). There is none good (the real morality) but God (God is the moral one regardless of what we think of Him)."