• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A Disturbing Book in the school libary. Read by an 11 year old to the school board.

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I think sex education should be initaited when the girls go see the "movie".

Little kids should concentrate on being little kids and learn to tie their shoelaces and cut construction paper.
Why? Why not educate them before they develop adult hang-ups, whilst their minds are still malleable, and before they learn what to be shocked by? That way they'll grow up without the prurient obsessions and neuroses adults seem to be plagued with.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
They do. It’s typically known as “curriculum.”
That this book was lent out to a child is inappropriate, I agree.

Though not being American, I’m not entirely sure of your age groupings you have in your schools.
Since “Middle School” isn’t really a universal thing in Australia.
We likely have more age overlap, so my schools likely had explicit material. So I feel a bit hypocritical to admonish this school library, to be honest
Middle school where I live is 7-8 grade so 13-14 year old's. It varies a little by area. I think the community that supports that school should decide what is appropriate and what is not.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
The logic that some have expressed already is its nothing that 11 year kids dont already know about.

These are the type of people that probably would condone things like Hustler, Gallery and Penthouse to be included in a school library to that particular age group in a grade school setting.

Parents be damned on what they think on the matter.

That is the mentality of these people who feel they know what's best, other then a child's own parents.




.
yeah, my 12 year old does not know about these things and does not need to know yet. We are teaching him about sexuality as we go and as appropriate.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
So you're against libraries in school? You want to make it more difficult for kids to learn of new things, challenging ideas, unfamiliar cultures, values, religions, &c?
Isn't the whole purpose of education to expand one's world and familiarize people with things they don't encounter in their own neighborhoods, amongst their own people?
I never said any of this.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
yeah, my 12 year old does not know about these things and does not need to know yet. We are teaching him about sexuality as we go and as appropriate.
S/he doesn't "need" to know about maths, reading or history, either.
Isn't it best to teach sex, anatomy, reproduction, &c before adults teach the kids to be shocked by them? Wouldn't this lead to healthy, unashamed, non-neurotic, non-prurient, non-obsessed adults?

Wouldn't teaching kids that sex is shameful, secret, and titillating, before they even learn what it is, lead to obsessive, unhealthy hang-ups as adults?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Wouldn't teaching kids that sex is shameful, secret, and titillating, before they even learn what it is, lead to obsessive, unhealthy hang-ups as adults?
Oh, you shouldn't have used the word "titillating" as the "culture wars" blind believers might thing that's way too erotic. Should it be erased from all of the dictionaries that the kids use? :mad:
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
A good compromise would be a parents approval before acquiring 'sensitive' books.

If I am reading the kid's statement right, it sounds like his dad was there when he checked it out:

“'When I rented it out and showed my dad it, the librarian asked if I wanted more and if I wanted a graphic novel version,' Knox said."


I acknowledge that this could be a misinterpretation of a kid's statement, but consider that his dad has been one if the more vocally assertive parents at these meetings.

Libraries need to be free to provide literature for all students, not just catering to a few.

I mean, if we go by sexual situations or nudity, think of the quality literature that'd be removed from libraries. Have you read Orwell's 1984?
 

Sand Dancer

Currently catless
It looks to me like it's the conservative parents and churches that are the activists. They seem to fear expanding their kids' minds and familiarity with the wider world by sheltering them from any ideas they, themselves find unsettling.
Maybe they should just home school the kids so they'll grow up sheltered, insular and threatened -- like themselves.
Yes, I can attest that is often the case. Sheltered kids do not help society. They need to learn how to deal with reality, so it doesn't smack them in the face and they don't know how to act. My son was in Christian schools K-8, and in high school he had no idea about the things that some of the kids did, so he was immediately curious and fell into all of the bad behavior we wanted to shelter him from. He said he wished he would have known about them earlier, so he would have known how to be able to avoid them.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
S/he doesn't "need" to know about maths, reading or history, either.
Isn't it best to teach sex, anatomy, reproduction, &c before adults teach the kids to be shocked by them? Wouldn't this lead to healthy, unashamed, non-neurotic, non-prurient, non-obsessed adults?

Wouldn't teaching kids that sex is shameful, secret, and titillating, before they even learn what it is, lead to obsessive, unhealthy hang-ups as adults?
I never said don't teach these topics. Why do you keep misrepresenting things I have said?
 
Top