The Black Whirlwind
Well-Known Member
i don't think Bush is at all smart enough or cunning enough to pull off a Palpatine.Faint said:That's similar to what Anakin said about Senator Palpatine. And we all know how that went down.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
i don't think Bush is at all smart enough or cunning enough to pull off a Palpatine.Faint said:That's similar to what Anakin said about Senator Palpatine. And we all know how that went down.
:biglaugh:The world needs more comedians like you Faint.Faint said:Hold on...why are these the last days? And on exactly which date will the world end? (I need specifics so I can max out my credit cards and go out in style)
That's probably true. As a man, he's just some Texas clod from a rich family. I can't deny that. But his administration is pretty damn cunning. They got a guy like him into office for a second term, and they've also got people like you thinking that Bush is protecting this country. Meanwhile, Bush also seems to be warding off asteroids of dangerous sizes, since we haven't been hit by any of those either since this war began.Fat Kat Matt said:i don't think Bush is at all smart enough or cunning enough to pull off a Palpatine.
Why is that interesting?Faith_is_an_assurance said:It is interesting that this thread was started by a Muslim.
Thank you, Faint, for a perfect example of why a correlation does not imply causality.:clapFaint said:Meanwhile, Bush also seems to be warding off asteroids of dangerous sizes, since we haven't been hit by any of those either since this war began.
well, we don't really know if HE is or isn't do we? He could be doing nothign, or he could be doing everything. He must be doing something right.Faint said:That's probably true. As a man, he's just some Texas clod from a rich family. I can't deny that. But his administration is pretty damn cunning. They got a guy like him into office for a second term, and they've also got people like you thinking that Bush is protecting this country. Meanwhile, Bush also seems to be warding off asteroids of dangerous sizes, since we haven't been hit by any of those either since this war began.
[font="]Faith_is_an_assurance said:I am not a fanatical christian either.
I am a realist.
I don't know what you're refering to, but I don't think that Michael was expecting to be twinkled. Since you want to bring religion into a political debate (and I really don't think they belong together), read 2 Nephi 1:7. We're not going to be taken over by terrorists.Faith_is_an_assurance said:I hope there are many more years of terrorist free attacks on the Untited States but the Holy Ghost whispers to me otherwise. I believe, as does Michel, that we will be gone before the world all goes bad and the United States is ruled by another power. Civil unrest will set us up for an outside nation to take over. We will be ruled by another nation sooner or later if we do not unite as a nation and fight against terrorism.
I was wondering the same thing.Sunstone said:Why is that interesting?
Some people called scientists think the world will end in billions of years when the sun expands. But if you're talking about the human race--I agree. No one knows when we wil end or even if we will end.Faith_is_an_assurance said:No one knows when the world will end.........
Seems to me that political unrest is what has helped make this country as great as it was (past tense because we've been going downhill since he-who-cannot-be-named took office). What you seem to be advocating is a theocracy, which is a great way to ruin a nation. Personally, I'd rather not have a president who appeals to a supernatural entity for help with real world events. Prayer is a form of surrender anyway--and that's not a good trait for any president trying to pose as a great war lord.Faith_is_an_assurance said:I am not an extremist just a realist who sees where all this is going if we do not pray and elect a Praying President like George Bush..........
Political unrust will only bring division of our country and DIVIDED WE WILL FALL.....
I think that there are many Muslims in the world who do not know why President Bush is in Iraq or in the White House for that matter. I think that there are Muslims who do not know how Bush could still have supporters after the war that HE supposedly started.Sunstone said:Why is that interesting?
First of all I agree that political unrest can strengthen a nation..... Oposing forces outside our nation also make us stronger...Whether it is within or without my point is that if we oppose everything that is good in this country that we will only degrade into a lesser more primitive state like many third world countries.Faint said:Some people called scientists think the world will end in billions of years when the sun expands. But if you're talking about the human race--I agree. No one knows when we wil end or even if we will end.
Seems to me that political unrest is what has helped make this country as great as it was (past tense because we've been going downhill since he-who-cannot-be-named took office). What you seem to be advocating is a theocracy, which is a great way to ruin a nation. Personally, I'd rather not have a president who appeals to a supernatural entity for help with real world events. Prayer is a form of surrender anyway--and that's not a good trait for any president trying to pose as a great war lord.
From your previous post:Mr Spinkles said:Ethics 202: sitting back and watching while one person terrorizes an entire country is generally considered to be unethical (even if he's not doing anything to you).
Must spread karma around before giving it to NetDoc again!!NetDoc said:Yeah, but we HAVE to let him finish his second term. That's how things are done here in America!
And who will watch the watchers?Faith_is_an_assurance said:Someone needs to defend this country from terrorists.
I will do more than read that scripture I will post it here.jonny said:[font="]
That's definitely debatable. You're sounding a little fanatical right now, but it keeps life interesting. [/font]
I don't know what you're refering to, but I don't think that Michael was expecting to be twinkled. Since you want to bring religion into a political debate (and I really don't think they belong together), read 2 Nephi 1:7. We're not going to be taken over by terrorists.
GOD WILLlilithu said:And who will watch the watchers?
ARRRRRRGHHH!!!! :banghead3 Terrorists, based in Afghanistan, attacked the WTC and Pentagon. We went to war against Afghanistan and toppled that govt, yet never found bin Laden. THEN, we went to war against Iraq. There is no evidence that Iraq had anything to do with the attack on 9/11. NO EVIDENCE. NONE. The war in Iraq is not the war on terror! Mr. Bush started the war against Iraq, not the terrorists. The only way that anyone could equate the war on terror with the war in Iraq is if they believed that all Muslims/Arabs are terrorists, and that is absolute BULL!!Faith_is_an_assurance said:I think that there are many Muslims in the world who do not know why President Bush is in Iraq or in the White House for that matter. I think that there are Muslims who do not know how Bush could still have supporters after the war that HE supposedly started.
Remember HE did not start the war. The TERRORISTS started the war.
My point is that if we do not support people like Bush then we are setting ourselves up for the Second Coming of Christ...He will have to come down to take us up and out of here before it gets too bad for us as Christians...jonny said:Hi Faith,
I think you need to start another thread. This one isn't really supposed to be about the second coming.