• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A Universe from Nothing?

Thief

Rogue Theologian
No, time does not depend on our sensing of it. When we go to sleep the universe doesn't grind to a halt.
the movement is real
the measure is all in your head

the movement will be there.....whether or not you are keeping time
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
the measure is all in your head

No, it isn't, that's what clocks are for. The most accurate clocks are atomic clocks, based on atomic forces, you can't get more fundamental than that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_clock

What goes on in peoples' heads is another matter entirely. People have subjective inner experiences like "timelessness" or "stillness" or "God" and project them out, assuming they have some correlation in the external world. But there is no evidence that they DO have any correlation, it is generally wishful thinking or egocentricity. Such experiences might change how people PERCEIVE the external world, but that is as far as it goes, the external world is just as it was before.

The universe doesn't care how you look at it, and that is what is so wonderful about it!
 
Last edited:

`mud

Just old
Premium Member
cyclical, one says,
not spiralling around a moving vortex along the waves of the Cosmos ?
~
oh why not !
Nothing is ever in the same place more than once, wagons forward !
And......there is no 'now' !

~
'mud
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
When I say that I am the Indestructible Sunyata, I mean that is my true nature, not that it is a thing that I am. My true nature is the same nature as that of the Universe, as yours is, making our consciousness universal as well.

You know, when Yeshu said 'I Am', he did not mean he is a thing that exists; he meant his true nature is Pure Being that comes out of this eternal Present Moment, and not out of history; not out of time and space.
If it is your true nature, my confused friend, then it is indeed a thing as you have defined it as such. Your second comment is mere speculation. You cannot know enough about the universe itself to say this with an authority. The nonsense part of this is that though you claim consciousness is universal you cannot tell me what I plan to do in the next 2 hours. Consciousness is therefore limited. How can consciousness be both limited and universal at the same time?

In regards to your "I am" sentiments, I don't need to refer to what you think Jesus meant, as I only have to remember my own experiences of the "I am" event. What you are saying is only somewhat true however. The "I am" experience is much deeper, much more profound and much more powerful that you are suggesting. It is, quite literally, a world shaking realization of the fact that personality has a core and that core can be reached within our earthly experience, expanding our ordinary consciousness beyond its wildest dreams.
 

RationalSkeptic

Freethinker
'exists' as what? maybe it is not a thing that exists, but a dream. When you dream, your dream-world is real to you, is it not?

Correct, however considering that the universe has consistent laws and the dream world does not I would say it is more probable that it is objectively real than it is a dream world.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
No, it isn't, that's what clocks are for. The most accurate clocks are atomic clocks, based on atomic forces, you can't get more fundamental than that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_clock

What goes on in peoples' heads is another matter entirely. People have subjective inner experiences like "timelessness" or "stillness" or "God" and project them out, assuming they have some correlation in the external world. But there is no evidence that they DO have any correlation, it is generally wishful thinking or egocentricity. Such experiences might change how people PERCEIVE the external world, but that is as far as it goes, the external world is just as it was before.

The universe doesn't care how you look at it, and that is what is so wonderful about it!
your last line is correct
the universe has no reflection of what we think

time is only a quotient on a chalkboard
it cannot ever be more
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Yep. I secretly wish for a pair of rose tinted spectacles sometimes. ;)
I know what you mean. If only, eh?

One thing our banter reminded me of was a few years ago, I was looking up into the moonless sky, here in LotusLand. At first my view of the stars was ordinary and suddenly it hit me that all the points of light I was seeing all left their source at wildly different time periods. I wasn't just looking back into time, but into a million different times. That's when things got dazzling. Somehow my brain digested that data and I began to see the sky as if through 3D glasses as spacial relationships began to expand. I was somewhat breathless when my vision returned to normal mode a few seconds later, but I've never looked at the night sky the same ever since. It was an extraordinary perception that helped me to understand the vast distances in space a little bit better and yes, it made me feel very, very small...
 

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
One thing our banter reminded me of was a few years ago, I was looking up into the moonless sky, here in LotusLand. At first my view of the stars was ordinary and suddenly it hit me that all the points of light I was seeing all left their source at wildly different time periods. I wasn't just looking back into time, but into a million different times. That's when things got dazzling.

It's mind-boggling. I still remember the first time I saw a full night sky, it was far out to sea with no light pollution, meteors everywhere too. Wow! I've done some amateur astronomy, fascinating stuff.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
It's mind-boggling. I still remember the first time I saw a full night sky, it was far out to sea with no light pollution, meteors everywhere too. Wow! I've done some amateur astronomy, fascinating stuff.
Yeah, I'm fortunate enough to live about 20 miles from the nearest city, across the water...
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
the book I got uses the word...void....
what most people call ...nothing....

I see the 'uncreated' as perfectly uniform
no heat....no cold
no light...no shadow
no Voice .....no Echo

kinda hard to say...I AM! .....with nothing to show for it
The I AM is eternal....so are all the conceptual attributes.....the created and the uncreated...

Mind comes from this sublime and completely unified source above; it is divided only as it enters into the universe of human distinctions. —Menahem Nahum
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
If it is your true nature, my confused friend, then it is indeed a thing as you have defined it as such.

But I have not. Sunyata is not a material 'thing' or obje
ct.

Your second comment is mere speculation. You cannot know enough about the universe itself to say this with an authority. The nonsense part of this is that though you claim consciousness is universal you cannot tell me what I plan to do in the next 2 hours. Consciousness is therefore limited. How can consciousness be both limited and universal at the same time?

I see you haven't been paying attention, or you have only been paying attention to how you interpret what you read.
Universal Consciousness does not mean that I have your factual knowledge or even that of the Universe. It simply means that the consciousness you have to know such facts is the same consciousness that I possess, and both are the same consciousness of the Universe itself. Now, there are two kinds of consciousness: conditioned and unconditioned. Conditioned consciousness is limited consciousness because it is the consciousness of the rational mind. It is mind, which is personally sculpted consciousness. This is the state known as Identification; it is of the self, and so is self-view, and is the consciousness of the thinking mind. Unconditioned consciousness has no self-nature; is unlimited, and pure, 'pure' meaning 'clear'. Because it has no self-nature, it is universal. It does not think; it sees.


In regards to your "I am" sentiments, I don't need to refer to what you think Jesus meant, as I only have to remember my own experiences of the "I am" event. What you are saying is only somewhat true however. The "I am" experience is much deeper, much more profound and much more powerful that you are suggesting. It is, quite literally, a world shaking realization of the fact that personality has a core and that core can be reached within our earthly experience, expanding our ordinary consciousness beyond its wildest dreams.

You're full of it. I Am has no personality attached to it. The 'I' in 'I Am' does not refer to the ordinary personal 'I' that we call personality or even self. It refers to Being itself, and as such, is the Being of the divine nature. To say it to you in Hindu terms:

'Tat tvam asi', or 'Thou art That'

Yeshu is obviously referring to what he is in this Present Moment, as he has always been here in the Present Moment, and that is not a thing like an ego called 'I'; it is his true nature which is Being. If he were only talking about personality, he would never have said it in this manner.

Who is it that is confused here?
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
Lordy, a new-age nightmare, there are 7 stages and 180 pages! I'm not ploughing through all that.

Could you just answer my question? What exactly is the difference between universal and cosmic consciousness? You use these terms regularly, so SURELY you can explain clearly what the difference is.

Saying "Cosmic Consciousness is the highest realization of Universal Consciousness" doesn't help because you haven't clearly explained what either of them are.

Even better, how about giving clear, succinct definitions for both of these, which should make the difference clear. Please use plain English, a couple of sentences for each should do it.

OK. Cosmic Consciousness is a silly Buddhish trying to make Enlightenment fit into a nice, neat little square hole because anything else frightens him to death. Enlightenment for him must be completely digestible to the rational mind, and fully explainable upon demand.

'Your papers, please!"

Now go to your room!
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
Saying "Cosmic Consciousness is the highest realization of Universal Consciousness" doesn't help because you haven't clearly explained what either of them are.

The Buddha achieved Supreme Enlightenment, which is Cosmic Consciousness. You claim to be a Buddhist, whose goal is to achieve Enlightenment, even though you don't know what that is. Even if it were explainable, you would'nt become enlightened. Interesting.

So do you want the description of Enlightenment, or the experience?

Are you still eating the menu instead of the meal?

Corn flakes.

*Crunch*

BTW, save the boxtop to redeem for a Cap'n Crunch Nirvana Ring:D
 
Top