Rick O'Shez
Irishman bouncing off walls
that we 'sense' a passing of time
No, time does not depend on our sensing of it. When we go to sleep the universe doesn't grind to a halt.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
that we 'sense' a passing of time
think about it
the movement is realNo, time does not depend on our sensing of it. When we go to sleep the universe doesn't grind to a halt.
the measure is all in your head
If it is your true nature, my confused friend, then it is indeed a thing as you have defined it as such. Your second comment is mere speculation. You cannot know enough about the universe itself to say this with an authority. The nonsense part of this is that though you claim consciousness is universal you cannot tell me what I plan to do in the next 2 hours. Consciousness is therefore limited. How can consciousness be both limited and universal at the same time?When I say that I am the Indestructible Sunyata, I mean that is my true nature, not that it is a thing that I am. My true nature is the same nature as that of the Universe, as yours is, making our consciousness universal as well.
You know, when Yeshu said 'I Am', he did not mean he is a thing that exists; he meant his true nature is Pure Being that comes out of this eternal Present Moment, and not out of history; not out of time and space.
'exists' as what? maybe it is not a thing that exists, but a dream. When you dream, your dream-world is real to you, is it not?
your last line is correctNo, it isn't, that's what clocks are for. The most accurate clocks are atomic clocks, based on atomic forces, you can't get more fundamental than that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_clock
What goes on in peoples' heads is another matter entirely. People have subjective inner experiences like "timelessness" or "stillness" or "God" and project them out, assuming they have some correlation in the external world. But there is no evidence that they DO have any correlation, it is generally wishful thinking or egocentricity. Such experiences might change how people PERCEIVE the external world, but that is as far as it goes, the external world is just as it was before.
The universe doesn't care how you look at it, and that is what is so wonderful about it!
cyclical, one says,
Nothing is ever in the same place more than once, wagons forward !
And......there is no 'now' !
That is certainly true, but what we believe about what we are seeing will most definitely colour that sight.The universe doesn't care how you look at it, and that is what is so wonderful about it!
That is certainly true, but what we believe about what we are seeing will most definitely colour that sight.
I know what you mean. If only, eh?Yep. I secretly wish for a pair of rose tinted spectacles sometimes.
One thing our banter reminded me of was a few years ago, I was looking up into the moonless sky, here in LotusLand. At first my view of the stars was ordinary and suddenly it hit me that all the points of light I was seeing all left their source at wildly different time periods. I wasn't just looking back into time, but into a million different times. That's when things got dazzling.
Yeah, I'm fortunate enough to live about 20 miles from the nearest city, across the water...It's mind-boggling. I still remember the first time I saw a full night sky, it was far out to sea with no light pollution, meteors everywhere too. Wow! I've done some amateur astronomy, fascinating stuff.
The I AM is eternal....so are all the conceptual attributes.....the created and the uncreated...the book I got uses the word...void....
what most people call ...nothing....
I see the 'uncreated' as perfectly uniform
no heat....no cold
no light...no shadow
no Voice .....no Echo
kinda hard to say...I AM! .....with nothing to show for it
If it is your true nature, my confused friend, then it is indeed a thing as you have defined it as such.
Your second comment is mere speculation. You cannot know enough about the universe itself to say this with an authority. The nonsense part of this is that though you claim consciousness is universal you cannot tell me what I plan to do in the next 2 hours. Consciousness is therefore limited. How can consciousness be both limited and universal at the same time?
In regards to your "I am" sentiments, I don't need to refer to what you think Jesus meant, as I only have to remember my own experiences of the "I am" event. What you are saying is only somewhat true however. The "I am" experience is much deeper, much more profound and much more powerful that you are suggesting. It is, quite literally, a world shaking realization of the fact that personality has a core and that core can be reached within our earthly experience, expanding our ordinary consciousness beyond its wildest dreams.
Lordy, a new-age nightmare, there are 7 stages and 180 pages! I'm not ploughing through all that.
Could you just answer my question? What exactly is the difference between universal and cosmic consciousness? You use these terms regularly, so SURELY you can explain clearly what the difference is.
Saying "Cosmic Consciousness is the highest realization of Universal Consciousness" doesn't help because you haven't clearly explained what either of them are.
Even better, how about giving clear, succinct definitions for both of these, which should make the difference clear. Please use plain English, a couple of sentences for each should do it.
Saying "Cosmic Consciousness is the highest realization of Universal Consciousness" doesn't help because you haven't clearly explained what either of them are.
You keep spreading this falsity it doesn't make it true. Might as well say Gravity is just silly maths nothing to worry about if you jump off a cliff. Time is as fundamental as the gravity that bends it.time is only a quotient on a chalkboard
it cannot ever be more