Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

[jes-us]

Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

The following proves that God Almighty is the Creator of all things.

Suppose that you had never seen a modern cell phone or knew of its existence. You find such a device. An examination of its incredible uses and how intricately it was made would prove the existence of the intelligent makers of that phone. Now consider a large modern city. There are very many cell phones in it and a huge host of other things and activities that make that city and its inhabitants function. An analysis of that city proves the existence of the intelligent beings that made, run, and function in that city. This is even more sure than just the cell phone. Now look at all of civilization. It consists of very many cell phones, many cities, and many other things. An analysis of that civilization proves the existence of the intelligent beings that made that civilization. This is even more sure than in the city example. Finally look at all living things in the world. The intricacies of living things (DNA, RNA, proteins, enzymes, organs, reproduction, the interconnected food chain etc) and their irreducible mutual complexity is way beyond anything that man has made and by an enormous amount. All people have done so far is try to understand how living things work and even now are just scratching the surface. Thus, an examination of all living things and how they interact with the rest of the creation proves the existence of Almighty God the Creator of all things. And this surety is way beyond than even the civilization example. So, here is yet another irrefutable proof that God Almighty, the Creator exists and the He created all things.

Thus, the enormity of the following less winded statement as found in the Bible should be clearly apparent to all the world.

19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: - Rom 1:19-20

Since this wisdom, written about 2000 years ago, comes from the word of God, it proves the Bible is the true word of God. There are many things which prove the Bible is the true word of God. Now the Bible predicted that knowledge shall be increased in the last days. But with all the great advances in biology, the passage in Romans 19-20 has not only withstood the scrutiny of science but has been immensely verified by it.

But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased. – Daniel 12:4

This proof uses mathematical induction. Thus, the proof is irrefutable.
n = intelligently designed objects.
n=1 is just one cell phon, an intelligently designed object
n=k is many cell phones and all other intelligently designed objects.
n>0 -> C>=0 where C is the number of intelligent creators.

I don't think your math is anything like Gods cell placement coding .

 

[YoursTrue]

Surrounded.
But it is just beginning. Hamas is a small terrorist group .
Hezbollah may yet join in but would be no match.
There are terrorists in Yemen that have fired rockets.
And the UN has yet to put a force into the area.
And there are many other nations that may eventually send a force,

Also the offer of peace like the Abraham accords or Biden, the UN, and the pope calling for a cease fire and a 2 state solution is right from the Bible.

All the encounters people say they have with the "beyond..." Also meaning God in some cases and angels. Gorillas, chimpanzees, ducks and fishes do not have written historical documents about any encounters like that -- with angels, or each other. They evidently weren't /aren't interested in figuring out evolution.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It ain't necessarily so, the things that you're liable to read in the bible, it ain't necessarily so.

Lot was obviously also a liar like Trump and blamed his daughters for his continual sexual assaults of them. And how on earth would the two girls manage to get their dirty old man to even maintain an erection while completely drunk anyway, let alone get him to ejaculate on two occasions which also coincided with their ovulations, given he would have had brewers droop particularly at his age. Or did the girls use an electro-ejaculator and a turkey baster to inseminate themselves.
And if the girls wanted to become pregnant, they could have just ducked down to Zoar, and I'm sure there were plenty of young studs who were ready willing and able to help them.
And they may have even found their fiances there who Lot was hiding from, after he mocked them when he tried to pimp their fiances to the other people who were also outside Lot's house with his future sons in law, and who also wanted to know what Lot was up to with the two blokes he picked up down town.

Dude! It is a work of fiction. So Lot did not do that. Quit trying to make fiction real.

 

[Monty]

Dude! It is a work of fiction. So Lot did not do that. Quit trying to make fiction real.

The writer was still trying to make his fictional character out to be a nice bloke instead of a drunken bucket of sleeze, and knew nothing about male sexuality and brewers droop.

Or perhaps Lot actually got his daughters drunk, since mothers used to tell their daughters to just lie back and think of England, and they could still become pregnant.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The writer was still trying to make his fictional character out to be a nice bloke instead of a drunken bucket of sleeze, and who nothing about male sexuality and brewers droop.

Or perhaps Lot actually got his daughters drunk, since mothers used to tell their daughters to just lie back and think of England, and they could still become pregnant.

You don't have to keep repeating yourself. When you see that notice your post did not go through. Just hit refresh.

Have you dated many women? It does not sound like it. There was once a girl that I dated, cute young, at least younger than me, we never got past the coffee stage because she already had two kids from two fathers and I could tell that she was looking for daddy number three. I ended up ghosting her. About a year later I saw her again where we first met. Surprise surprise, she was knocked up. Now maybe it would have worked out, but I did not want to take a risk on some girl with a spotty history, two kids already from two dads, that clearly wanted to get pregnant. Some women really really want to have a baby.

 

[Monty]

You don't have to keep repeating yourself. When you see that notice your post did not go through. Just hit refresh.

Have you dated many women? It does not sound like it. There was once a girl that I dated, cute young, at least younger than me, we never got past the coffee stage because she already had two kids from two fathers and I could tell that she was looking for daddy number three. I ended up ghosting her. About a year later I saw her again where we first met. Surprise surprise, she was knocked up. Now maybe it would have worked out, but I did not want to take a risk on some girl with a spotty history, two kids already from two dads, that clearly wanted to get pregnant. Some women really really want to have a baby.

But perhaps they use an electro-ejaculator and a turkey baster.

 

[Esteban X]

The writer was still trying to make his fictional character out to be a nice bloke instead of a drunken bucket of sleeze, and knew nothing about male sexuality and brewers droop.

Or perhaps Lot actually got his daughters drunk, since mothers used to tell their daughters to just lie back and think of England, and they could still become pregnant.

Are you saying that it's impossible for females to be sexual predators? Because that is demonstrably false

 

[Monty]

Are you saying that it's impossible for females to be sexual predators? Because that is demonstrably false

So why didn't Lot's daughters just drop down to Zoar for a quickie or two with some of the blokes there, instead of mucking around with an electo-ejaculator and a turkey baster?

And why did Lot try to pimp his daughters to the other people who were outside his house with his sons-in-law and who also wanted to know what Lot was up to with the two blokes he picked up down town? And did Lot's daughters ask him to try to pimp them?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Are you saying that it's impossible for females to be sexual predators? Because that is demonstrably false

Just ignore that error message and refresh. Your post won't through. There is no need to double post.

 

[Kelly of the Phoenix]

Abraham tried to save Sodom In Genesis 18. He got God to agree to not destroy it if there were just 10 righteous in that city and Gid agreed. But there were not even 10, so God destroyed it.

Then why save Lot? He was a jerk.

Lott was his relative and Abraham loved him, his wife and their 2 children.
Lott did screw up though.

So it’s less about morality and more about politics. Got it.

 

[shunyadragon]

Most of the Grand Canyon was carved out by drain off in the aftermath of the worldwide flood when the sediment layers were still soft.
Look at the sediment layers deposited by the flood.
Thanks for a photo that proves the word of God.

Actually no, the sediment was not soft the delta deposits of the Colorado River are made up of gravel and sand deposits from the solidified sedimentary and volcanic rocks from the erosion of the Grand Canyon. The Canyon contains metamorphic, volcanic basalt and limestone rock which were never soft sediments in geologic history.

The meandering pattern of the Colorado River demonstrates that the Canyon was worn down in hundreds of thousands of years at least.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Actually no, the sediment was not soft the delta deposits of the Colorado River are made up of gravel and sand deposits from the solidified sedimentary and volcanic rocks from the erosion of the Grand Canyon. The Canyon contains metamorphic, volcanic basalt and limestone rock which were never soft sediments in geologic history.

The meandering pattern of the Colorado River demonstrates that the Canyon was worn down in hundreds of thousands of years at least.

Not with the first few years after the flood.
And the drain off was a tremendous amount of water.

 

[John53]

Not with the first few years after the flood.
And the drain off was a tremendous amount of water.

Go observe a river and after a few years you should be able to see for yourself how wrong that statement is.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not with the first few years after the flood.
And the drain off was a tremendous amount of water.

Yes, that would erase the meanders. It would not preserve them. Thank you for refuting the flood myth.

Would you like to try again? It seems that you forgot your loss involving the North Fork of the Toutle River. There were no meanders there. That is why you lost.

 

[Monty]

Are you saying that it's impossible for females to be sexual predators? Because that is demonstrably false

The only time I've come across that was in Vung Tau when you got groped by the girls.

 

[YoursTrue]

Go observe a river and after a few years you should be able to see for yourself how wrong that statement is.

You mean like after a flood?

 

[YoursTrue]

Go observe a river and after a few years you should be able to see for yourself how wrong that statement is.

I'm just wondering why you think gorillas are not interested in figuring these things out. After all, evolution says we're so close to them. The gap made a big difference in wondering about these things, didn't it. Somehow only one branch from that "Unknown Common Ancestor" has figure estimates, theories, telescopes, microscopes, that little bit of difference in the DNA really adds up, doesn't it?

 

[Monty]

I'm just wondering why you think gorillas are not interested in figuring these things out. After all, evolution says we're so close to them. The gap made a big difference in wondering about these things, didn't it. Somehow only one branch from that "Unknown Common Ancestor" has figure estimates, theories, telescopes, microscopes, that little bit of difference in the DNA really adds up, doesn't it?

Most people aren't interested either, which demonstrates evolution within our species, and why we aren't all identical to each other as falsely concluded from the theory of creation, which hypothesizes that we all have identical genomes as inherited from Adam and his god.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Most people aren't interested either, which demonstrates evolution within our species, and why we aren't all identical to each other as falsely concluded from the theory of creation, which hypothesizes that we all have identical genomes as inherited from Adam and his god.

Mitochondrial Eve is proven fact and God designed the DNA which determines individuals who are different .

 

[Esteban X]

Mitochondrial Eve is proven fact and God designed the DNA which determines individuals who are different .

Your wilful ignorance is both painful and amusing to watch. "Mitochondrial Eve" does not mean what you think it means