What lie?I see we moved past being outraged at his religious principles not matching modern progressivism to maliciously lying about him to make it worse.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What lie?I see we moved past being outraged at his religious principles not matching modern progressivism to maliciously lying about him to make it worse.
I support directives against denying people service based on many immutable characteristics. I support allowing service providers to decide which purposes they will give service for.If not, what are the restrictions would you support?
What I quoted.What lie?
You clearly didn't read the article as the cake was made blue on the outside and pink on the inside to celebrate transgenderism. It obviously wasn't just a birthday cake.It was a birthday cake. "What the cake was celebrating" was that the recipient stayed alive for one more year. If trans people continuing to live violates his conscience, he can go screw himself.
The fact that something like this is "a matter of conscience" makes it personal.
Did you even read the article?Birthdays violate his conscience? After he specifically said he'd make birthday cakes for people?
I support directives against denying people service based on many immutable characteristics. I support allowing service providers to decide which purposes they will give service for.
Your assumption is incorrect, all evidence points to gender dysphoria being immutable at the sort of age where one might buy their own cake. I even clarified how the current refusal could be shown to be that sort of discrimination.I assume your view is TG is not an immutable characteristic as there would be a conflict between the two expressed views.
I can assure you that Mormons will not only sell you Pepsi; they'll also drink it, and there's nothing in their religion that tells them not to. Of course, the smart Mormons drink Coke instead.Where does it end? The Muslim grocery checker who won't sell you that beer? The Mormon who won't sell you that Pepsi? Civil society needs to be free of religious prejudice.
It also forbids poly/cotton blends, shellfish and bacon double cheeseburgers. Now, I've gotten the retort "but in Acts ... Jesus said no food is unclean". Okie-fine, but he also said not one jot or tittle of the Law would be erased until Heaven and Earth pass away. So that means poly/cotton blends are still an abomination, as are planting peppers, tomatoes and squash in the same field. Millions of Italians (Catholics no less! ) are on the express to hell. My point is the cherry-picking and hypocrisy many "Christians" exhibit.
And I so hoped Mormons to favor Pepsi over Coke... oh the pain.I can assure you that Mormons will not only sell you Pepsi; they'll also drink it, and there's nothing in their religion that tells them not to. Of course, the smart Mormons drink Coke instead.
What do you mean by that? Does it have some sort of weapon hidden inside it or what?You clearly didn't read the article as the cake was made blue on the outside and pink on the inside to celebrate transgenderism. It obviously wasn't just a birthday cake.
What about it is a lie?What I quoted.
Very good points - especially that last statement.To be clear. I have no problem to sell my cake to LBGTX people. In whatever combination.
But if they ask me to put meat in it, I say NO and have the right to say so.
So I have the right to follow my conscience in doing my job.
Well...I know a country village with 8,000 inhabitants where there are at least three patisseries.1) They aren't rare. What's rare is that they're challenged.
2) The fact that there's already one cake shop in an area is often an obstacle to other cake shops coming into the market.
Correct, Jesus didn't make a new contract. He completely fulfilled the original as no ever could or ever can.I find that this is perhaps the one thing I have to repeat the most to Christians. That Jesus didn't make some new contract with the people.
And in my town of ~30,000, plus the towns immediately around it, there are only two bakeries that do custom cakes. Both get busy, so there’s a good chance that on a given weekend, only one will be available.Well...I know a country village with 8,000 inhabitants where there are at least three patisseries.
I don’t doubt that she tried to order the cake there to see if the shop was still breaking the law. I don’t see anything wrong with that; do you?By the way, these stories aren't that credible, imho...because usually it's other people who order a birthday cake for...I don't know...a surprise party.
So? To her it is a birthday, a rebirth of sorts. Which I think I said earlier. Rights, personal, legal or otherwise aside, the baker is simply twisting and making a mockery of the religion he is supposed to be holding dear. Honestly, it's disgusting and unconscionable.
That it is a purposefully mendacious characterization.What about it is a lie?
Let's be better than that. We both know he objected to baking a cake celebrating a "transition" not a birthday.t seems to me to be a fair paraphrasing.
The characterization was correct.That it is a purposefully mendacious characterization.
It was both. It was a birthday cake.Let's be better than that. We both know he objected to baking a cake celebrating a "transition" not a birthday.
The characterization was correct.
Let's be better than that.
I suppose if I offered to give 1000$ to a charity if I could slap you with a metal pipe and you objected, it would be fair to headline your response as "9-10th penguin objects to giving 1000$ to charity", right?It was both. It was a birthday cake.