Anti-Islamic Sentiment on RF

[Sahar]

so you are indeed being forced to watch homosexuals have sex? or are you choosing to watch?

Nice She never said homosexuals, she said "sex", "consenting adults" and "school children".
What do you think? Should they be tolerated?

 

[JMorris]

LOL!

And you don't think that maybe........ the children would be harmed by seeing that? I don't understand how that question has a point?

it dosent. but you cant expect irrational people holding an irrational position to be able to defend such a position rationally.

 

[301ouncer]

so you are indeed being forced to watch homosexuals have sex? or are you choosing to watch?

posts such as these, and others in this thread & others goes to show how much the majority muslims on RF truly care about how much non-muslims respect or tolerate their religion. i will not tolerate intolerance. if representations of islam such as these (that being an irrational fear & hatred of homosexuals), is at all representative of islam (and it certainly seems to be), then i see no reason why i should be expected to either respect or tolerate their religion. and, in as far as i can tell, the majority of muslim members on RF seem to want it that way.

You free to believe what to believe. But to call people foolish is outright disrespectfull.

Same sex education in the anti-christ system to a child is like watching a homosexual WMD sex. They might as well give them a trip to a homo cinema and call it a school trip.

 

[maro]

Yeah, they are: the kids.

Thank you storm

Similarily , when two consenting adults allow four eye witnesses to witness their action or intent of adltery or sodomy....they are harming the whole muslim society...so,they will not be tolerated not for their private action ,but for avowing it in the society

Does that make some sense to you ?

 

[Storm]

Thank you storm

Similarily , when two consenting adults allow four eye witnesses to witness their action or intent of adltery or sodomy....they are harming the whole muslim society...so,they will not be tolerated not for their private action ,but for avowing it in the society

Does that make some sense to you ?

No...

 

[Madhuri]

You free to believe what to believe. But to call people foolish is outright disrespectfull.

Same sex education in the anti-christ system to a child is like watching a homosexual WMD sex. They might as well give them a trip to a homo cinema and call it a school trip.

And using the same 'logic' does this mean that opposite sex education is like showing kids porn?

 

[Aquitaine]

You free to believe what to believe. But to call people foolish is outright disrespectfull.

Yeah don't be disrespectfully guys, stop calling people foolish.

Anyways back to the anti-christ WMD destructive gay sex that is corrupting our societies (where we should have the right to throw Homos off the top of buildings).

Did I mention the anti-christ WMD gays?

 

[Sahar]

JMorris, you have done nothing here except name calling and being disrespectful. This is a good example how threads turn into uncivilized arguments.

 

[301ouncer]

And using the same 'logic' does this mean that opposite sex education is like showing kids porn?

Yes indeed, bravo, WMD porno.

 

[Madhuri]

What does WMD stand for in this context?

 

[Aquitaine]

JMorris, you have done nothing here except name calling and being disrespectful. This is a good example how threads turn into uncivilized arguments.

I personally think this thread has turned into "Anti-Gay Sentiment on RF".

^_^

 

[Storm]

I personally think this thread has turned into "Anti-Gay Sentiment on RF".

^_^

Oh, but that's ok, because we deserve to be pushed off of buildings.....

 

[maro]

LOL!

And you don't think that maybe........ the children would be harmed by seeing that? I don't understand how that question has a point?

so when we talk about ' harm ' here....it's not physical harm of course....it's another type of harm that most of you seem to ignore while talking about the ' harmless actions of the consenting adults '

you know what type of harm is it ? I think that was not4me's question

 

[Madhuri]

I don't know about in other countries but sex education was more something presented in high school. In an education system, the incorporation of the issues of homosexuality would be presented as facts like everything else. I do not know what people assume here, but the teacher is not going to stand in class and describe the sexual act. I don't see what the big deal is here.

 

[301ouncer]

I personally think this thread has turned into "Anti-Gay Sentiment on RF".

^_^

WMD rape, WMD wife killing, WMD porno, WMD family incest, WMD Homo, WMD fornication, WMD adultry, WMD, WMD WMD. Everything is linked.

Take the blue pill and I will show you how deep the rabbit hole is..

 

[JMorris]

Nice She never said homosexuals, she said "sex", "consenting adults" and "school children".
What do you think? Should they be tolerated?

that such a question is even brought forth in a question of moral equivalency clearly shows the seriousness or even the rationality of the person asking the question.

the question at hand is whether consensual sex between two adults (whether homosexual or not) is tolerable. two adults having sex in front of school children is no longer a situation solely involving two consenting adults. its a situation involving two consenting adults, and a group of non-consenting children. so you cannot make the point that the two are morally equivalent, because the situation is not equivalent. it would be like asking if out-right murder is morally equivalent to a fatal sports related accident.

 

[Storm]

WMD rape, WMD wife killing, WMD porno, WMD family incest, WMD Homo, WMD fornication, WMD adultry, WMD, WMD WMD. Everything is linked.

Take the blue pill and I will show you how deep the rabbit hole is..

Oh, so that's the secret to your logic? I have to get high?

 

[Sahar]

I personally think this thread has turned into "Anti-Gay Sentiment on RF".

^_^

LOL, I disagree, it's typically anti-Islamic sentiment. Calling us irrational and making a stupid lie like Islam leads to rape more...
The last talk was about the Western values in general, I believe.
Plus, the rest of the thread went through a wide range of topics...that, at the end, revolve around Muslims.

 

[Aquitaine]

so when we talk about ' harm ' here....it's not physical harm of course....it's another type of harm that most of you seem to ignore while talking about the ' harmless actions of the consenting adults '

you know what type of harm is it ? I think that was not4me's question

Yeah, I think I do. I'm gonna take a long shot and presume the "harm" is some sort of Psychological mental scarring, again, what's that got to do with......

Wait, what actually is your point?! Is all this supposed to be some well-written argument against Homo-sexuality or something?

I honestly don't understand where this is going.

 

[JMorris]

You free to believe what to believe. But to call people foolish is outright disrespectfull.

Same sex education in the anti-christ system to a child is like watching a homosexual WMD sex. They might as well give them a trip to a homo cinema and call it a school trip.

you are free to believe what you want to believe. but to call homosexuals the anti-christ is outright disrespectful.