Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
Edited.
I disagree god exists; so, like any topic, religious or not, Id always ask out of the idea god exists or does not exist. His existence does not matter to me. But I dont need to project my opinion to ask questions that entertains the contrary.
If someone knows god does not exist, the question relating to god wouldnt be a problem to answer because both would go by the idea as the topic not the validity of the information before the question is answered.
We dont need to know that god exists, nor critize questions that assumes his existence, to answer questions about him. Its not math when one needs to know arethmatic to get algebra. Its just a topic.
It means steping from religious bias (both sides) and answer the question as is.
Only believers and non-believers (those opposing god-religions namely christianity) tend to be defensive over the word god. To order to answer the question, the believer cant entertain answer without subjecting their beliefs when some questions...
Or.
You have the other pary critizing any question made of god without entertaining the fact he does exist in order to make sense of the question asked and the answer given.
It is a very irritating point or view. Its like saying a character needs to exist in order to entertain if he did, what if.... if he does not, what if...
Has nothing to do with god.
As most of the others have said, - we don't know that anyone has ever spoken with a God, or if one or more even exist.
Saying your message is from a God, doesn't make it so.
*
I disagree god exists; so, like any topic, religious or not, Id always ask out of the idea god exists or does not exist. His existence does not matter to me. But I dont need to project my opinion to ask questions that entertains the contrary.
If someone knows god does not exist, the question relating to god wouldnt be a problem to answer because both would go by the idea as the topic not the validity of the information before the question is answered.
We dont need to know that god exists, nor critize questions that assumes his existence, to answer questions about him. Its not math when one needs to know arethmatic to get algebra. Its just a topic.
It means steping from religious bias (both sides) and answer the question as is.
Only believers and non-believers (those opposing god-religions namely christianity) tend to be defensive over the word god. To order to answer the question, the believer cant entertain answer without subjecting their beliefs when some questions...
Or.
You have the other pary critizing any question made of god without entertaining the fact he does exist in order to make sense of the question asked and the answer given.
It is a very irritating point or view. Its like saying a character needs to exist in order to entertain if he did, what if.... if he does not, what if...
Has nothing to do with god.
Last edited: