Atheists believe in miracles more than believers

[ChristineM]

Internet forums are no longer useful... they are full of useless automatons that all they do is spread hatred among the few of us who participate with the interest of dialogue with others. It is no surprise that with each passing day society goes from bad to worse.

It's good that I am a Jehovah's Witness. We are not part of this world that will soon end.

I think what we have here is a blatant case of pot calling kettle black. I've rarely seen any other religious person throw so much hate and vitriol at atheists.

 

[ChristineM]

paarsurrey said:
And science is still in the making, right, please?

" fixed "
Who fixed them, please?

Regards

The fact that they have never, ever been falsified by anyone despite many different qualified people trying is their fix

 

[Pogo]

Bots don't care about being ignored... but it fascinates me how, curiously, the ones who program them don't seem to care either. Did someone talk about "dehumanization"?

Society is sick because of people like they, who spread hatred and bad treatment between people. For that they use robots that they program to insult.

I wonder if they can program a robot to feel shame; It is easier for them to be able to demonstrate it one day than for those who program them to demonstrate it. Sometimes even animals are more affectionate than some people.

Isn't it true that God has to sweep away the rubbish of this world? Too much has accumulated.

Do you feel shame for presenting strawman versions of science and evolution after having them shown to you as faulty numerous times or is this misrepresentation considered acceptable in this end justifies the means new version of door knocking.

In terms of automatic behaviour, you would do well to look at your own and realize that you only have preset answers for everything and that is you are wrong because my belief says otherwise. Like a Victorian era arcade mystic that spits out it's preprinted answer on a piece of paper tape.

 

[paarsurrey]

The fact that they have never, ever been falsified by anyone despite many different qualified people trying is their fix

So, it is one's perception; does one know all the Universal Laws, please?

Regards

 

[YoursTrue]

When you don't have an argument, you can always attempt to dehumanize your opponent, a strategy that seems all too common these days.

really, doesn't it? Meanwhile some believe in miracles and others do not. That's about it.

 

[YoursTrue]

So, it is one's perception; does one know all the Universal Laws, please?

Regards

My dear Dr. Hawking tossed that around a bit...

 

[YoursTrue]

Do you feel shame for presenting strawman versions of science and evolution after having them shown to you as faulty numerous times or is this misrepresentation considered acceptable in this end justifies the means new version of door knocking.

In terms of automatic behaviour, you would do well to look at your own and realize that you only have preset answers for everything and that is you are wrong because my belief says otherwise. You are like the Victorian era arcade mystic that spits out it's preprinted answer on a piece of paper tape.

I was wondering -- if I got a book on evolution that was written in 1960, would there be any changes since then in the "evidence" lending to the theory?

 

[Pogo]

So, it is one's perception; does one know all the Universal Laws, please?

Regards

Ah the old We don't know everything so we don't know anything and my wild a**ed guess is just as good as your years of study.

 

[ChristineM]

So, it is one's perception; does one know all the Universal Laws, please?

Regards

I am sure you can read and understand my post, it is not perception when validated multiple times

 

[Pogo]

really, doesn't it? Meanwhile some believe in miracles and others do not. That's about it.

Whoosh, better to keep quiet when you don't understand a post.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I think what we have here is a blatant case of pot calling kettle black. I've rarely seen any other religious person throw so much hate and vitriol at atheists.

Or against Christians and other religious people.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

paarsurrey said:
And science is still in the making, right, please?

" fixed "
Who fixed them, please?

Regards

I believe it is "fixed" as in "established" and not "fixed" as in "repaired".

 

[Pogo]

I was wondering -- if I got a book on evolution that was written in 1960, would there be any changes since then in the "evidence" lending to the theory?

There is a whole lot more of it. Genome sequencing and the entire genetic phylogeny matching the morphological one could only have been hoped for in 1960.

 

[We Never Know]

Bots don't care about being ignored... but it fascinates me how, curiously, the ones who program them don't seem to care either. Did someone talk about "dehumanization"?

Society is sick because of people like they, who spread hatred and bad treatment between people. For that they use robots that they program to insult.

I wonder if they can program a robot to feel shame; It is easier for them to be able to demonstrate it one day than for those who program them to demonstrate it. Sometimes even animals are more affectionate than some people.

Isn't it true that God has to sweep away the rubbish of this world? Too much has accumulated.

Bots or not, you have kept them going here for 27 pages.
I would say to keep that many posters going day after day and repeatedly returning for more for 27 pages is quite an accomplishment.
They might secretly like you.

 

[YoursTrue]

There is a whole lot more of it. Genome sequencing and the entire genetic phylogeny matching the morphological one could only have been hoped for in 1960.

I didn't ask that, though. Maybe I did not make it clear enough. Were there any changes (differences?) or amendments since 1960, do you think?

 

[Eli G]

Bots or not, you have kept them going here for 27 pages.
I would say to keep that many posters going day after day and repeatedly returning for more for 27 pages is quite an accomplishment.
They might secretly like you.

I know, right?

If only they realized that I make the forum move more, they would start kissing my feet.

I'm not really asking for that much, just a little respect for the effort I make to share ideas that are obviously reasonable and worthy of respect, at the very least.

Sometimes I even think about an amnesty for my ignored ones... but then I listen to them from the hole and remember why I put them there.

 

[YoursTrue]

Bots or not, you have kept them going here for 27 pages.
I would say to keep that many posters going day after day and repeatedly returning for more for 27 pages is quite an accomplishment.
They might secretly like you.

I think so. Good thing we're on a message board of sorts. Nevertheless, the questions remain. Such as: if a person is NOT an atheist but believes in the validity of the theory of evolution, why is he not an atheist? Let me guess -- because that's his choice? Even though he claims to know so much about science, etc. and the theory of evolution and believes it.

 

[paarsurrey]

I believe it is "fixed" as in "established" and not "fixed" as in "repaired".

Friend @ChristineM
So it is also one's perception in "other" words, please, right?

Regards

 

[Pogo]

I didn't ask that, though. Maybe I did not make it clear enough. Were there any changes (differences?) or amendments since 1960, do you think?

No you attempted a gotcha question which failed due to your misunderstanding of science and evolution.
Science as everybody is telling you is not static and new information is being incorporated every day, this is why it is useful.

 

[YoursTrue]

No you attempted a gotcha question which failed due to your misunderstanding of science and evolution.
Science as everybody is telling you is not static and new information is being incorporated every day, this is why it is useful.

there is no gotcha. Science changes its information upon occasion, that is true. And what was taken as true years ago is not necessarily true today. (Or tomorrow.)