• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Baha'i and Science

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Yes I know that interpretation by Abdul-Baha that after Jesus passed away here was doubt in the disciples. Then after 3 days they became aware of His true station and that He was not dead and then His Cause became alive again after a period of doubt.

as to reincarnation He says it’s the qualities which I agree with because the rise of next year returns in essence but not the same actual DNA of this years rose.
So I guess it's time. What do Hindus mean by reincarnation. My guess is that an eternal soul goes through many lifetimes in different bodies. Spiritually, that soul learns things from each of those lives. Plus, there's karma involved in there too.

Next year's rose is the return of physical thing. But... with humans the children aren't physically an exact copy of their parents. And are "qualities" inherited? But a human, has a soul or spirit. Does it ever die? So is it assigned to just one physical body and then goes into a spiritual world for eternity? I have no problem if that soul or spirit gets assigned to several physical beings to learn and grow spiritually or to work off bad karma or whatever.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
A question of my own - how does one separate Krishna from Hinduism, since not everything in Hinduism may be directly compatible with the Baha'i faith? Such as reincarnation.

Why is the 8th avatar, Krishna, made significant, but not the others?

Respectfully, it'd kind of be like someone giving me a candy bar and someone else asking me what it was and whether the person giving it to me bought it for me. It'd be like me not denying it was a candy bar, and not being able to answer how they knew which kind I liked, but admitting that it existed in the universe and it was safe to eat, while not acknowledging the conclusion that someone probably bought me a candy bar. So at some point, I feel if one's going to accept Krishna, they also tend to accept deeply rooted Hindu beliefs like reincarnation as true. I think. Maybe a Hindu can correct me if I'm wrong.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
So I guess it's time. What do Hindus mean by reincarnation. My guess is that an eternal soul goes through many lifetimes in different bodies. Spiritually, that soul learns things from each of those lives. Plus, there's karma involved in there too.

Next year's rose is the return of physical thing. But... with humans the children aren't physically an exact copy of their parents. And are "qualities" inherited? But a human, has a soul or spirit. Does it ever die? So is it assigned to just one physical body and then goes into a spiritual world for eternity? I have no problem if that soul or spirit gets assigned to several physical beings to learn and grow spiritually or to work off bad karma or whatever.

Wow, we just about made the same post. Haha.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Trailblazer said: I am getting sick of hearing these lies and I won't tolerate them anymore.

Not quite sure what to make of this. Is it a threat or have you just become so emerged in your religion you feel you are some type of divine defender of the contradictory and false narratives?
It is no threat at all. I am not a divine defender, but I have been charged with defending the Faith by correcting false information that is posted.
It is not that important.
Atheists are supposed to be logical, and most are. If the Baha’i Faith is not important then why do all the people on this thread spend so much time trying to knock it down? What damage can the tiny little religion do? I find that absolutely hilarious how much time these anti-Baha’i posters spend trying to knock it down. It does not bother me one bit because nobody can knock down what God has raised up; I just find it funny that they try so hard, like they have any power at all to against a religion that was revealed by an Almighty God. Mind you, I realize that *you* do not believe it was revealed by an Almighty God; I am just trying to explain *my* perspective.
It is just another offshoot of Islam and one of thousands of other minor belief systems out there.
That is not true, the Baha’i Faith is not an offshoot of Islam; it is a completely separate religion. The Baha’i Faith is no more an offshoot of Islam than Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism. The Baha’i Faith grew out of Islam just as Christianity grew out of Judaism, but these are all separate religions because they all had their own Prophet (Messenger of God) that revealed their religions (Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, and Baha’u’llah).
It is not worth calling others liars when all they are doing is pointing out the obvious contradictions between what is written by the prophets and leaders of the religion and what the adherents claim are the views.
There are no contradictions, but if you can tell me what you think is contradictory I will explain why it is not.

And some of what people are saying on this thread are flat out lies. They are just hoping they can sway some unsuspecting people who know nothing about the Baha’i Faith.
Maybe just take a step back and try to look at what other people see with an open mind?
I know what they see because they are constantly pointing it out. I have an open mind but that does not mean I am going to agree with them because that would mean dropping out of my religion. I am not dropping out just because of the Baha’i Law on homosexuality. If I did that then that would prove I did not really believe in Baha’u’llah. It would also mean I think “I know more” than Baha’u’llah, who I believe is a Manifestation of God. That would be highly arrogant.
Or just go about happily following your chosen belief system without the need to prove to everyone else what you personally feel is the ultimate truth?
I am not trying to prove anything to anyone. I am on RF to engage in respectful dialogues with people about whatever they want to discuss. This thread is obviously not the place to do that.
Everyone has what they feel is their own truths and ways of living. There must be uplifting practices, rituals or community involvement activities which would unite you with others who think the same way? Then it wouldn't always be a negative outcome making one feel as if they always are defending their views.
There are others who think the same way but they usually become Baha’is. Most people either love the Baha’i Faith or they hate it, although there are some exceptions, people who say “oh, that’s nice.”

How can we unite with people who hate us and the religion we love? Just look at what people have said on this thread alone, and this is just one thread. It is open season on Baha’is everywhere on RF, and once hunting season is over on one thread they pack up their bags and move to another thread.

Don’t you even wonder why they do not attack other religions? Oh, they will have some more lies to tell you, that we are interpreting their religions and other religions don’t do that. The irony is that the only religious scripture the Baha’is interpret is the Bible and I do not see any Christians complaining about that, only Hindus. The Baha’is have cordial relationships with the Christians on this forum.

Yes, everyone has what they feel is their own truths and ways of living and they have a right to those, so what can’t people just leave the Baha’is alone to practice our own Faith?

Show me one Baha’i who tried to convince anyone they should change their religion. Another big fat lie is when we are accused of proselytizing. Proselytizing means trying to convince or convert people but there is no evidence any Baha’is are trying to do that. It is disgraceful when people lie outright and I will point it out when the lie involves me or my religion. How would you like it is a gang of people came around and said that atheists are doing x, when you know you are not doing x? This is unjust.
Idk, it just seems a waste of time trying to convince strangers who do not think the religion is something they should be interested in. Especially if it becomes upsetting to you.
I am not trying to convince anyone that my religion is something they should be interested in. It’s kind of funny, because some atheists I have had lengthy dialogues with have asked me why I am not trying to convince them, because they think that is my job. I told them that if people are interested they have to do their own independent investigation. I can point them towards the resources but I cannot do their homework.

What upsets me is when people continually misrepresent me and the Baha’i Faith, but I am done defending myself and my Faith from these people. Nothing I say will make any difference, because they are convinced they are right about my religion.By contrast, I do not go around saying I know everything about their religion.

Another lie they perpetrate is that Baha’is think their religion is superior and better than the other religions. There is no evidence that Baha’is think their religion is superior; that is just the personal opinion of some people on this thread.

For the record, below is the “official Baha’i position” on homosexuality. People should argue against the official position rather than the straw man they construct.

Extracts from letters written by or on behalf of the Universal House of Justice:

As you know, Bahá'u'lláh has clearly forbidden the expression of sexual love between individuals of the same sex. However, the doors are open for all of humanity to enter the Cause of God, irrespective of their present circumstance; this invitation applies to homosexuals as well as to any others who are engaged in practices contrary to the Bahá'í teachings. Associated with this invitation is the expectation that all believers will make a sincere and persistent effort to eradicate those aspects of their conduct which are not in conformity with Divine Law. In the case of homosexuality, the Guardian has stated, in a letter written on his behalf on 26 March 1950, that "through the advice and help of doctors, through a strong and determined effort, and through prayer, a soul can overcome this handicap!"
Homosexuality

No doubt you will not agree with that statement, but do you see anything in that statement about homosexuals being treated as “carrying a spiritual contagion”as someone on this thread stated? I don’t. That is what I mean by twisting the truth.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
A kid in grade 6 would figure out the false logic. But it's a type of psychological conditioning that runs deep. There has been so much self affirmation on it that the patient actually does believe it. For those of us with a more open mind, and no such programming, it's harder to understand, as we have no experience on such.
At one time I thought my Dad was perfect too.
Yeah, look what it's done to Fundy Christians. They are taught everything is literally true, that all the stories have to be believed, from Jesus coming back to life and floating off into the sky, to Satan roaming around in the spirit world, to Jonah getting swallowed by a big fish... then all the way to the story of Adam and Eve. And if they want to get even more literal, then Creation was only about 6000 years ago. I hope Baha'is don't get that extreme.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Then the choice we all get, is to make our own selves better and the key here is new and it is old teachings, remove the plank from our own eye before, attempting to moving a splinter from another.

I see that is to look for and promote what is good, I see we all have different views on what is good, so maybe we start with the basics of Trustworthy, Truthfull and all the rest of what is good will slowly become manifest within us.

Regards Tony
Sounds good to me. But nobody is saying not to do the good things in the different religions. It's the various beliefs that is the problem. If I'm doing good because I believe Jesus is God and has saved me from my sins, then if I listen to people in other religions, I find out they don't believe those things. Then what? And that is what's going on. People living and growing spiritually, but all believing in totally different things. And most of those different things we have come to believe in aren't things we can prove. They are just things are religions tell us are true.
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
Now let's see what comes up a couple verses later...
Do Baha'is believe the NT? Even when it says the Jesus Christ is the one coming? So what is the Baha'i interpretation of verse 23?

Jesus of Nazareth, who was 'Annointed' as 'Christ' (it is not a surname) and who was to be known as 'Christ' the Spirit, in the station of the 'Son of God', placed no importance on the flesh.

Thus Christ has returned 3 times since AD33, known as Muhammad, the Bab and Baha'u'llah.

Regards Tony
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
I find out they don't believe those things. Then what?

Live as Christ asked one to live, surely God can releive us from our perplexities if we unite in common virtue.

I have seen it said that many of the perplexities that arise in our "mind could be dissipated if one always conceived of the teachings as one great whole with many facets. Truth may, in covering different subjects, appear to be contradictory, and yet it is all one if one carries the thought through to the end.."

Regards Tony
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
Thus Christ has returned 3 times since AD33, known as Muhammad, the Bab and Baha'u'llah.

"In most of his prominent writings, the Báb alluded to a Promised One, most commonly referred to as man yazhiruhu'lláh, "Him Whom God shall make manifest", and that he himself was "but a ring upon the hand of Him Whom God shall make manifest." Within 20 years of the Báb's death, over 25 people claimed to be the Promised One, most significantly Bahá'u'lláh.

Before the Báb's death, he sent a letter to Mírzá Yahyá, Subh-i-Azal, that some consider a will and testament. This recognized the appointing of Subh-i-Azal as the leader of the Bábí community after the death of the Báb, and ordered to obey the Promised One when he appears. At the time Subh-i-Azal, still a teenager, had never demonstrated leadership in the Bábí movement, and was still living in the house of his older brother, Bahá'u'lláh. All of this lends credence to the Bahá'í claim that the Báb appointed Subh-i-Azal the head of the Bábí Faith so as to divert attention away from Bahá'u'lláh, while allowing Bábís to visit Bahá'u'lláh and consult with him freely, and allowing Bahá'u'lláh to write to Bábís easily and freely. Shia Islam includes a vast history of hidden leaders, and their deputies wielding the true power. The first examples of this are the four bábs as is Ali-Muhammad's choice of the title "the Báb".

In 1852 Bahá'u'lláh, while a prisoner in Tehran, was visited by a "Maid of Heaven", that symbolically marked the beginning of his mission as a Messenger of God. Eleven years later in Baghdad, he made his first public declaration and eventually was recognized by the vast majority of Bábís as "He Whom God shall make manifest". His followers began calling themselves Bahá'ís.

Subh-i-Azal continued to live with or close to Bahá'u'lláh throughout the latter's exiles from Iran to Baghdad and then to Istanbul and Edirne, though Bahá'u'lláh's claim as a Manifestation of God in 1863 theoretically rendered moot Subh-i-Azal's authority as the head of the Bábí community. In September 1867, in Edirne, the rival claims to authority came to a head. Subh-i-Azal challenged Bahá'u'lláh to a test of the divine will in a local mosque in Edirne such that "God would strike down the impostor". Bahá'u'lláh agreed and went to the Yavuz Selim Mosque at the appointed time, but Subh-i-Azal failed to show up.

Subh-i-Azal's followers became known as Azalis or Azali Bábís. For the Bábís who did not recognize Bahá'u'lláh, Subh-i-Azal remained their leader until his death in 1912, and Azali successorship remains disputed. Bahá'í sources report that 11 of the 18 "witnesses" appointed by Subh-i-Azal to oversee the Bábí community became Bahá'ís, as his son did. The man allegedly appointed by Subh-i-Azal to succeed him, Hadíy-i-Dawlat-Abádí, later publicly recanted his faith in the Báb and Subh-i-Azal.

Bahá'u'llah emerged more successful and nearly all of the Báb's followers abandoned Subh-i-Azal and became Bahá'ís. Today Bahá'ís have several million followers, while estimates of the number of Azalís are generally around one thousand in Iran."

Báb - Wikipedia
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
"In most of his prominent writings, the Báb alluded to a Promised One, most commonly referred to as man yazhiruhu'lláh, "Him Whom God shall make manifest", and that he himself was "but a ring upon the hand of Him Whom God shall make manifest." Within 20 years of the Báb's death, over 25 people claimed to be the Promised One, most significantly Bahá'u'lláh.

Before the Báb's death, he sent a letter to Mírzá Yahyá, Subh-i-Azal, that some consider a will and testament. This recognized the appointing of Subh-i-Azal as the leader of the Bábí community after the death of the Báb, and ordered to obey the Promised One when he appears. At the time Subh-i-Azal, still a teenager, had never demonstrated leadership in the Bábí movement, and was still living in the house of his older brother, Bahá'u'lláh. All of this lends credence to the Bahá'í claim that the Báb appointed Subh-i-Azal the head of the Bábí Faith so as to divert attention away from Bahá'u'lláh, while allowing Bábís to visit Bahá'u'lláh and consult with him freely, and allowing Bahá'u'lláh to write to Bábís easily and freely. Shia Islam includes a vast history of hidden leaders, and their deputies wielding the true power. The first examples of this are the four bábs as is Ali-Muhammad's choice of the title "the Báb".

In 1852 Bahá'u'lláh, while a prisoner in Tehran, was visited by a "Maid of Heaven", that symbolically marked the beginning of his mission as a Messenger of God. Eleven years later in Baghdad, he made his first public declaration and eventually was recognized by the vast majority of Bábís as "He Whom God shall make manifest". His followers began calling themselves Bahá'ís.

Subh-i-Azal continued to live with or close to Bahá'u'lláh throughout the latter's exiles from Iran to Baghdad and then to Istanbul and Edirne, though Bahá'u'lláh's claim as a Manifestation of God in 1863 theoretically rendered moot Subh-i-Azal's authority as the head of the Bábí community. In September 1867, in Edirne, the rival claims to authority came to a head. Subh-i-Azal challenged Bahá'u'lláh to a test of the divine will in a local mosque in Edirne such that "God would strike down the impostor". Bahá'u'lláh agreed and went to the Yavuz Selim Mosque at the appointed time, but Subh-i-Azal failed to show up.

Subh-i-Azal's followers became known as Azalis or Azali Bábís. For the Bábís who did not recognize Bahá'u'lláh, Subh-i-Azal remained their leader until his death in 1912, and Azali successorship remains disputed. Bahá'í sources report that 11 of the 18 "witnesses" appointed by Subh-i-Azal to oversee the Bábí community became Bahá'ís, as his son did. The man allegedly appointed by Subh-i-Azal to succeed him, Hadíy-i-Dawlat-Abádí, later publicly recanted his faith in the Báb and Subh-i-Azal.

Bahá'u'llah emerged more successful and nearly all of the Báb's followers abandoned Subh-i-Azal and became Bahá'ís. Today Bahá'ís have several million followers, while estimates of the number of Azalís are generally around one thousand in Iran."

Báb - Wikipedia

The Bab's intent for the One Whom God Would Make Manifest, was none other than Baha'u'llah.

This can not be disputed. If it could, the Covenant Breakers would have succeeded in splitting the Faith. The evidence only finds fulfilment in Baha'u'llah.

Regards Tony
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
The Bab's intent for the One Whom God Would Make Manifest, was none other than Baha'u'llah.

This can not be disputed. If it could, the Covenant Breakers would have succeeded in splitting the Faith. The evidence only finds fulfilment in Baha'u'llah.

Regards Tony

I'd have to see greater evidence to be convinced, like Bab saying that the Chosen One would have a large following.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
Now let's see what comes up a couple verses later...
Do Baha'is believe the NT? Even when it says the Jesus Christ is the one coming? So what is the Baha'i interpretation of verse 23?

The Bible says Jesus is coming but with a ‘new name’. Of course we believe that is true.
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
I'd have to see greater evidence to be convinced, like Bab saying that the Chosen One would have a large following.

This is from the Bab for all to consider;

"O concourse of kings! Deliver with truth and in all haste the verses sent down by Us to the peoples of Turkey and of India, and beyond them, with power and with truth, to lands in both the East and the West.… And know that if ye aid God, He will, on the Day of Resurrection, graciously aid you, upon the Bridge, through Him Who is His Most Great Remembrance.…...... O people of the earth! Whoso obeyeth the Remembrance of God and His Book hath in truth obeyed God and His chosen ones and he will, in the life to come, be reckoned in the presence of God among the inmates of the Paradise of His good-pleasure."

It was interesting it mentioned Turkey and India, then East, then West.

Regards Tony
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
There's lots of issues. One is that a manifestation is supposed to bring new social teachings to keep civilization moving forward. So what did Krishna bring? He didn't bring a new religion, but did he bring something that changed Hinduism for the better? Another would be was Krishna a historical person or a myth and legend? And then the same with the story. Were they real events?

I have no problem with things being religious myths. Stories handed down that teach lessons. But, in this case, Baha'is take Krishna as a not only a real person but a manifestation of the one true God. Does the stories about Krishna confirm that? Then there is the question of the Baha'is calling the past age the "Adamic" cycle. But Hinduism has their own cycles. So how does the Baha'i Faith tie in those cycles or do they?

I believe the Bhagavad-Gita is a spiritual treasure which is of great benefit to all humanity with regards to spiritual education. As far as cycles there are Baha’i scholars who have gone into the Hindu cycles and written about them.

I found this one just today so I’m happy to share it with you. Please note it’s only an individual viewpoint not authoritative. And there’s another one I’ve had for a while. Just individual reflections.

https://kprsamy.wordpress.com/2017/12/


Bhartiya Baha'i: HINDUISM AND THE BAHÁ’I FAITH
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
So I guess it's time. What do Hindus mean by reincarnation. My guess is that an eternal soul goes through many lifetimes in different bodies. Spiritually, that soul learns things from each of those lives. Plus, there's karma involved in there too.

Next year's rose is the return of physical thing. But... with humans the children aren't physically an exact copy of their parents. And are "qualities" inherited? But a human, has a soul or spirit. Does it ever die? So is it assigned to just one physical body and then goes into a spiritual world for eternity? I have no problem if that soul or spirit gets assigned to several physical beings to learn and grow spiritually or to work off bad karma or whatever.

There are many Hindu sects and I am not familiar with all their beliefs in reincarnation. We are told that learning is eternal and that the soul continues to progress after death and keeps progressing and learning. Our belief is we continue to learn but at some point ‘meet with God in the world of eternity’. I think that means His Manifestation but only my thoughts. The thing is that the soul continues to progress. Some say it is by returning to this world, others say by traversing the worlds of God.

The rewards of the other world are peace, the spiritual graces, the various spiritual gifts in the Kingdom of God, the gaining of the desires of the heart and the soul, and the meeting of God in the world of eternity. (Abdul-Baha
 

Jim

Nets of Wonder
Anyways, I hope I don't look Iike I'm jumping between sides here. The message I wanted to send the Baha'is was just: "We can be friends. I'm fine. But I may keep up the debating so long as confusing ideas from the Baha'i faith, that seem to contradict that spirit I felt about it when studying for three months, that gist of it, keep getting posted here. The problem is, it's not possible to have one's cake and eat it too. You can't truely love without overall acceptance, in my world. But in order to accept, you tend to have to lay aside laws which alienate that 6% of humanity who mostly is good citizens."
Part of your confusion might be from thinking that there is only one “Baha’i Faith.”
 
Top