doppelgänger;1356699 said:
That's it? You make a comment like "you have a history of writing books and articles attacking a wide array of religious perspectives - with the notable
exception of Evangelical Christianity" and I show how that is mistaken, and all you say is "If you say so."
No, "Oh hey, dude, sorry about that?" No, "Well, that's a pleasant surprise"?
Hmmm,
okay.
doppelgänger;1356699 said:
C.S. Lewis is a heretic, too? I'm not planning on buying your book, but is your beef with Narnia that Lewis recasts part of the passion story with different characters?
Please -- and I am seriously saying, please -- talke a look at how you are assuming so much. Who said anything about me criticizing Lewis, let alone calling him a heretic??? Do you not see how many preconceived ideas you have about me? This is where communication breaks down and walls go on.
The fact is that I exalt Lewis as a brilliant genius, and I defend him against the likes of Philip Pullman. I criticize others in that book who would be classed as evangelicals -- namely, on one extreme, people who want to ban/burn Harry Potter books, and at the other extreme, people who say HP is some kind of "Christian" series (which is not a supportable view).
doppelgänger;1356699 said:
Or is it that you think, like Warnke, that magic is more than just psychological and kids shouldn't read anything dealing with magic?
I can assure you that I think nothing like Warnke.
doppelgänger;1356699 said:
No. I'm trying to get a straight answer about why you have a fixation with tearing down Mormons, New Age and other things that you don't seem to understand.
There is just so mush wrong with this, I almost don't know where to begin.
doppelgänger;1356699 said:
And your answers don't add up.
They don't add up because of your preconceived ideas about who/what I am -- as evidenced by your Lewis statement. You already have an image, a role, a slot into which I have been placed. It's not adding up because I am a octagon, not a square.
RA