heksesang
Member
Actually, in Norway Christianity was spread with the sword, much like how Islam was spread. So I'd say it would be the other way around, killed by the Christians for following the Nordic religion.Quantity doesn't matter in this matter of ethics. It's wrong to persecute anyone for simply having a different religion, period, regardless if its an in-group or out-group conflict. I see that you're from Norway. It would be as if you were living centuries ago and your relatives murdered you for converting from Germanic religion to Christianity.
How it looks to me, Christianity and Judaism combined (which is what I'd argue the Bible Belt Christians follow) makes a religion very similar to Islam. You have one part which is all about being peaceful and good, and one part which is way more brutal.Sure I guess, but I don't know how it's important when it comes to deciding if a religion is "peaceful" or not.
It's still God commanding people to murder other people for worshiping someone else. I can't see the difference when it comes to Christians saying their religion is peaceful while Islam isn't. They both have Gods that command their followers to murder people for various reasons.
The only real reason Christianity seems less murderous today is secularism. Christianity doesn't have any Theocracies. I guarantee if you let the Bible Belt in America form a nation where Christian Law ruled the country instead of secular law, you'd have homosexuals being put to death, adulterers, etc.
However, I'd argue "pure" Christianity is more similar to the peaceful part of Islam.