You counter your bluff with another bluff about bluffing with
Wait for it.
Another bluff!
Shocker!
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
California strong arm
- Thread starter Enoch07
- Start date
- Status
You counter your bluff with another bluff about bluffing with
Wait for it.
Another bluff!
Shocker!
Poisonshady313
Well-Known Member
So then would it be fair for me to say that your claim that NY and CA would determine every election has everything to do with a belief that these states do now and will always cheat in a manner that would render the other 48 states (plus DC) irrelevant?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Poisonshady313
Well-Known Member
But why just the Democratic popular vote? Surely the full total popular vote is the relevant number, is it not?
By threatening to point out my "error" then not doing it. That is a bluff.
bluff1
/bləf/
noun
- 1.
an attempt to deceive someone into believing that one can or will do something.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I see that you are still afraid to take me up on my offer. By the way, when running away it is not the right time to use that video.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
How?
Poisonshady313
Well-Known Member
I'm stuck on this. I need you to explain it to me.
What is the value of saying that the California vote is 50% or greater than the Democratic popular vote? What does that mean?
I told you repeatedly to cite my "error". You refuse then counter with yet another bluff.
I'm not the one trying to bluff and misrepresent arguments, and then run away from it.
That's you projecting again.
I'm here to stay.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, there was a cost. You ran away. And those posts were merely me responding to your original error. When you are the one running away it is rather silly to accuse the other of bluffing.By threatening to point out my "error" then not doing it. That is a bluff.
bluff1
/bləf/
noun
Post # 249, 245, 239, 236, 229, 221, and on and on and on. It's really embarrassing to bluff so much, get called out for bluffing then still deny them when it's easy to see you never follow through.
- 1.
an attempt to deceive someone into believing that one can or will do something.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I did right from the start. Now I will not do so again for free.I told you repeatedly to cite my "error". You refuse then counter with yet another bluff.
I'm not the one trying to bluff and misrepresent arguments, and then run away from it.
That's you projecting again.
I'm here to stay.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
II told you repeatedly to cite my "error". You refuse then counter with yet another bluff.
I'm not the one trying to bluff and misrepresent arguments, and then run away from it.
That's you projecting again.
I'm here to stay.
Nope, you are running away since you refuse to do your homework or to pay the price.
It means that the DNC has been caught committing voter fraud in the past. And now they seek to manipulate the system in their favor even more by circumventing the EC and putting more requirements to be on the ballots.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Where and when has the DNC been caught doing that? I do not know of any recent cases. And how does the EC prevent that?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
LOL.
The only cost is listening to you bluff endlessly, then deny it all. Thanks for the laughter though.
Poisonshady313
Well-Known Member
But why focus on the Democratic popular vote rather than the whole popular vote? After all, it's just over 50% of the whole popular vote that would win a popular vote election, yes?
- Status