I can cite them. I offered to do so.
Then do it already and stop talking about it. So boring.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I can cite them. I offered to do so.
No, you only cited your errors. Try again.I have evidence to the contrary. It has Ben cited.
Sure you don't, you instead misrepresent and.....
Nope nothing but arguments in good faith eh?
How embarassing.
Potentially, considering California has the highest population of any state, at 38+million. Should more decide to vote it alone could be 50% or more of the popular vote. Considering 65 million voted for Hillary in the popular vote in 2016. Adding New York only increase that number.
As soon as you own up to your errors. If you can't be honest enough to do that there is no point. I am not wasting my time for you. You refuse to do your homework and I have offered to do it for you. Payment up front please.Then do it already and stop talking about it. So boring.
I cannot follow his "logic".Do you believe that 38+million only describes the number of voters in CA, or the whole population of CA?
Do you believe that each and every man, woman, and child, citizen and non-citizen alike, would be counted in a popular vote election?
No, you only cited your errors.
As soon as you own up to your errors.
I do not bluff.
That's why I'm asking questions... to see where it goes.I cannot follow his "logic".
I don't bluff. You refuse to do your homework. I offered to do it for you. You are now not just running away. You are lying. The offer still stands.Nope the just your blatant misrepresentations.
So another bluff then. Not surprising.
I guess we can put that little fairy tale to rest now can't we.
I don't think he will seriously try to support his claim.That's why I'm asking questions... to see where it goes.
Potentially, considering California has the highest population of any state, at 38+million. Should more decide to vote it alone could be 50% or more of the popular vote. Considering 65 million voted for Hillary in the popular vote in 2016. Adding New York only increase that number.
Do you believe that 38+million only describes the number of voters in CA, or the whole population of CA?
Do you believe that each and every man, woman, and child, citizen and non-citizen alike, would be counted in a popular vote election?
I don't bluff.
One more question... Why would it matter how much of Hillary's vote came from any state? Surely a discussion on this topic would be concerned about Hillary's vote from any given state compared to the total US popular vote, would it not?
Please, you are afraid. Unlike you I do not bluff. I will do your homework for you if you pay the price.You hold on to that fairy tale for your dear life!
Don't let it go!
Live your reality!
The whole population. That's why I said "potentially".
It's not beyond the realm of possibility.
Considering the DNC had been caught bussing in people to different districts to swing the vote in their favor.
Sting Video Purports To Show Democrats Describing How To Commit Voter Fraud
You brought up the number of Hillary voters in the last election. I was just responding to you.I don't care about the past elections. Its behind us. The future is what matters.
Unlike you I do not bluff.
ff. I will do your homework for you if you pay the price.
Hypothetical:
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that only eligible, registered voters vote and only once. Fairly and legally.
Given this parameter, could California (with or without) still be 50% of the total national popular vote?
It already is true. But since you won't do your homework and you won't pay the price you will never know.Keep repeating it, maybe some day it will be true!
Ah ha you counter your bluff with another bluff!
You brought up the number of Hillary voters in the last election. I was just responding to you.