wooow again ,Of course I do.
even stop "insulting me " or why " you insulting me " did not existed in your dictionnary ?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
wooow again ,Of course I do.
sound good that she condemned the film .But we have done that. Hillary Clinton, the Secretary of State, condemned the film, didn't she?
for my opinion that's required ,if that's help to stop the voilence ,to stable the peace and respect between the west and muslims world .So you want us to pass a law which allows the US government to control internet content?
don't thank God , because you are exagerate , so this forum is a place for freedom of speech without laws?Nope. Thank God there is no such law. This forum could not exist if we had laws like that.
that's right .Think about it. I have my own personal religion. I consider myself the Prophet of my own religion. Therefore, if you insult me, you are insulting my religion. If I am the president's nephew, I could have you arrested for disrespecting my religion.
the respect the others is become nightmare in the west ?!!!!Maybe that works in the Mideast, but to Westerners... that's a nightmare.
this forum had laws , i guess youtube had different laws .Thank God we have no such laws here.
not only the muslims are poor .OK. But we don't believe in gagging people over here. One reason we are so powerful is that we allow freedom of speech. In my opinion, it's why many Muslim countries are still so poor and desperate. A country can't grow if its people aren't allowed to sit around exchanging strange new ideas without fear of arrest.
good point sister, the voilence that done by some muslims is kind of disobey Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) teachs .This, my friend, is the most important part of it all. If they do, indeed, love the Prophet more than they love themselves, it would only be logical that they emulate his behavior. If HE wouldn't and didn't act violently when insulted, why should anyone else?
Also, asking google to delete some idiotic film is absurd. The problem isn't the film, the problem is giving it any credence at all.
i am with freedom of speech , but with respect , and without mock or lieing , that film is give a different story about Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) (lie/fake)what if my belief is freedom of speech and expression?
is freedom of speech allow to lie and mock and insult ?that isn't true. they stopped it in the region where freedom of speech and expression are under the oppression of religious beliefs. not in the countries that protect the freedom of speech
If we all agree & don't offend, then freedom of speech isn't necessary.i am with freedom of speech , but with respect , and without mock or lieing , that film is give a different story about Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) (lie/fake)
is freedom of speech allow to lie and mock and insult ?
I suspect they will blame the people who attacked the consulate. Those who used the film.
What we know it that the attack probably was already planned and they just used the film as an excuse.
They were going to attack the consulate with or without the film.
as i told you , Islam name root , is came from arabic word "Salam" (peace)
i don't know your point here , by these quesiton .Godobeyer, based on the premise you proposed here, do you think that all religions without exception for example: Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, and even Pagan religions are also entitled to be protected from mockery the same way that you propose Islam should be? What about, say, Satanism? Do you think that it should be protected from mockery as well?
not only Bil clinton also some muslims leaders are sucks too .If we all agree & don't offend, then freedom of speech isn't necessary.
We live in a country where a woman was jailed because she told Bill Clinton that he sucked.
Government lusts for the power to deny us the right to bear words. I value the right to mock & offend.
Muslims will accept this peacefully or violently oppose it. Either way, we will persevere.
i guess you posted a thread , remember it's name "is islam religion of peace " or something like that .That is actually a rather common misconception, even among some native Arabic speakers.
The root of the word 'Islam' is 'aslama' (the singular masculine simple past tense of the verb meaning 'to submit'), so Islam actually means 'submission' (to God and His orders as detailed in the Qur'an and also taken from authentic Hadiths, according to most Islamic scholars) and not "peace."
Let's hope they come to embrace the peaceful aspects of the faith.not only Bil clinton also some muslims leaders are sucks too .
the freedom of speech is not intentionaly to insutl or mock or lie about other's beliefs .it's becomes offened speechs , drive to extremism not to peace or respect .
the muslims should not voilence , when they protesting , it's against Islam laws
-honesly it's contradiction happened , some muslims used the voilence by the name of Islam which ask them to don't use the voilence !!!
I always worry about "I'm against it but...". In effect; you are in agreement with the grievance but not the reaction and as such - are you saying that the video or cartoons must, by law, not be made?
.
Who cares "if we love our Prophet ?" , this ood question , maybe you cares ?Who cares? And, more importantly, why should anybody?
Why are Muslims more important than anyone else
why not ?
maybe you will stopping usWho is stopping them from loving their prophet?
OMG ,How weak. How desperately weak. Our media is talking about a princess being photographed with her tits out.
who Weak !!!! if you care about sexy scandels news !!!that's up to you .
this is politics , i had a thread about thisOh come on. "The west" ignores geography and religion when it comes to "crimes". It focuses on self interest only. Also, is Islam not supposed to be universal? Must I become "Eastern" to embrace it? Are you saying that Islam can only be cultural? BTW, how does Islam deal with crimes against Muslims when the perpetrators are of the same religion but more powerful than the victims? A political argument is not a religious argument unless someone makes it so (ah, the ways of the world).
http://www.religiousforums.com/foru...errorism-countries-groups-what-different.html
respect is not a prerequisite of free speech...:no:i am with freedom of speech , but with respect , and without mock or lieing , that film is give a different story about Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) (lie/fake)
is freedom of speech allow to lie and mock and insult ?
the white house sent a request to google to stop this **** , but google reject .
Freedom of speech means allowing those who disagree with you to speak freely, even when it is disrespectful. Islam is not used to an environment where the citizenry is not closely controlled and many Muslims feel a government can and should regulate personal speech and expression. If Muslims in Islamic countries wish to protest western free speech I have no problem with that. But when Muslims choose to live in western countries they have no right to demand these people's silence. If they wish to live in western culture then have to allow for some assimilation, otherwise they are attempting to alter the hosts countries culture to be more in line with their own and the host country has the right to fight against it.
Good! I'm offended & provoked if anyone says that a god exists.The arabic league want to pass new law in UN , about this issue , they want to establish new law about deny any provokation or mock or insult against any religion (not only Islam )
The arabic league want to pass new law in UN , about this issue , they want to establish new law about deny any provokation or mock or insult against any religion (not only Islam )
that's your opinion , if my freedom speech becomes lieing and mock about your religion , it's becomes offensive speech to you not freedom of speech .respect is not a prerequisite of free speech...:no:
they made fake story in a film , about Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) not , misrpresentiong .it is also allowed for one to speak freely...as in you misrepresenting...you are free to do so
however, they stopped it in the region where freedom of speech and expression are under the oppression of religious beliefs. not in the countries that protect the freedom of speech
not:
then why the White house send a request to Google ?
The arabic league want to pass new law in UN , about this issue , they want to establish new law about deny any provokation or mock or insult against any religion (not only Islam )
its not like that brother .Good! I'm offended & provoked if anyone says that a god exists.